Northern Iraq falls to Al Qaeda, $400 million looted from central bank.

ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
at the time Bush Jr used WMD as a reason for War, Iraq DID NOT have a stock pile of WMD.
Click to expand...
That wasn't my claim. I'm just stating that he did in fact have them, you yourself saying of course, he got them from us.

I'm not going to make the claim he still had them when we invaded, the evidence says otherwise. I'm also not willing to rule it out though that the UN was wrong in their claims of destroying all WMD just as they were wrong about Syria.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
if by "obsessing over you again", you mean "asking for you to cite your own claims with evidence and watching it not happen because you have no evidence for your ass-pulled claims", then yes.
Click to expand...
You've been like a spurned lover ever since I told you my cock is not for you.

So tell us, what do you ( Obama ) think we should do about the situation in Iraq.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You've been like a spurned lover ever since I told you my cock is not for you.

So tell us, what do you ( Obama ) think we should do about the situation in Iraq.
Click to expand...
it's hilarious how you and so many other right wingers seem to default directly towards thoughts of gay sex with me whenever i piss you idiots off.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
That wasn't my claim. I'm just stating that he did in fact have them, you yourself saying of course, he got them from us.

I'm not going to make the claim he still had them when we invaded, the evidence says otherwise. I'm also not willing to rule it out though that the UN was wrong in their claims of destroying all WMD just as they were wrong about Syria.
Click to expand...
after the first war and the UN inspections. Saddam had very little WMD. The stock pile he got from us was long gone. Sarin and tabun only have a shelf life of about 4-5 years. Bush 43 knew that that they had little WMD, but used it a a reason for war. Can't sign on to that type of bullshit that cost the USA so many lives. Whats the count now anyway. 4500 ???? all dead for a lie
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that's OK though because he made up a whole bunch of new justifications as he went along, and ginwilly was there to cheerlead the whole time.
Click to expand...
Ginwilly was against all the wars we have been involved in in the middle east, not just the Bush wars like some of the more hypocritical libs here.

That dog never did hunt buck. You warmongerers for politics are as bad as the for profit guys.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
after the first war and the UN inspections. Saddam had very little WMD. The stock pile he got from us was long gone. Sarin and tabun only have a shelf life of about 4-5 years. Bush 43 knew that that they had little WMD, but used it a a reason for war. Can't sign on to that type of bullshit that cost the USA so many lives. Whats the count now anyway. 4500 ???? all dead for a lie
Click to expand...
4 > 4500

 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
after the first war and the UN inspections. Saddam had very little WMD. The stock pile he got from us was long gone. Sarin and tabun only have a shelf life of about 4-5 years. Bush 43 knew that that they had little WMD, but used it a a reason for war. Can't sign on to that type of bullshit that cost the USA so many lives. Whats the count now anyway. 4500 ???? all dead for a lie
Click to expand...
Dude, have you read anything I've written? I have NO justification to invade a sovereign country. You are arguing against a stance I'm simply not taking.

I was against the justification then, just as I'll be against whatever reason Obama uses to go back in. My stance against war will not change based on letter behind the title.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Dude, have you read anything I've written? I have NO justification to invade a sovereign country. You are arguing against a stance I'm simply not taking.

I was against the justification then, just as I'll be against whatever reason Obama uses to go back in. My stance against war will not change based on letter behind the title.
Click to expand...
Iraq war is a touchy conversation for me
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
it's hilarious how you and so many other right wingers seem to default directly towards thoughts of gay sex with me whenever i piss you idiots off.
Click to expand...
Thoughts of gay sex with you is a turn off to me. It's odd I feel like I have to apologize to you for being hetero. I'm just not into you, nothing personal and I'm sorry you are hurt and angry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top