True that. For the razor to work, the facts have to be available.Occam's razor is usually only useful in science, not politics.
i'm sure you have evidence and citation of this, like always, and did not pull that claim from directly out of your ass region.Yes, that's also why we KNEW he had WMD, we sold them to em. Now we know they were moved to Syria.
another agenda21tard. as if having one didn't drag down this forum's collective intelligence enough already.This is all part of the agenda 21, population control. Wars have caused less casualties over the years and so they must find new ways to disembark on destroying the world.
Of course we knew he had them, the entire world knew. What is in question was whether or not they were still there when we invaded .i'm sure you have evidence and citation of this, like always, and did not pull that claim from directly out of your ass region.
nice evidence, genius.Of course we knew he had them, the entire world knew. What is in question was whether or not they were still there when we invaded .
Hey, for shits and giggles, tell us what you think we should do about it now,
No, the latest finding is that the population will crash on its own and it will be bad. And war is not a method for that. And it never was. War as we see, increases the birth rate.This is all part of the agenda 21, population control. Wars have caused less casualties over the years and so they must find new ways to disembark on destroying the world.
No un-classified evidence, either way.nice evidence, genius.
i'll mark that claim as "straight from the ass region".
Wait, are you trying to say Hussein never had WMD or are you just obsessing over me again?nice evidence, genius.
i'll mark that claim as "straight from the ass region".
Fix'd 4 eweAfter you having slept with my wife, I know now that you are one of the greatest men among us.
i'll mark that claim as "straight from bucks ass region".
Wrong Freud. That makes it straight from your ass region.Fix'd 4 ewe
if by "obsessing over you again", you mean "asking for you to cite your own claims with evidence and watching it not happen because you have no evidence for your ass-pulled claims", then yes.Wait, are you trying to say Hussein never had WMD or are you just obsessing over me again?
I would also add that "Great Leaders" killed their own people to much greater effect than all the wars combined. Starvation was well developed as a societal cleanser.No, the latest finding is that the population will crash on its own and it will be bad. And war is not a method for that. And it never was. War as we see, increases the birth rate.
If war reduced populations and we have been at it for 20,000 years, then the population would not would not be growing like this.
The biggest war we ever had was only 50 million killed. WW2.
So, try thinking and stop re-gurging opinions. Agenda 21? What a crock.
at the time Bush Jr used WMD as a reason for War, Iraq DID NOT have a stock pile of WMD.Wait, are you trying to say Hussein never had WMD or are you just obsessing over me again?
that's OK though because he made up a whole bunch of new justifications as he went along, and ginwilly was there to cheerlead the whole time.at the time Bush Jr used WMD as a reason for War, Iraq DID NOT have a stock pile of WMD.
and the Bush admin knew this. The war was never about WMD. It was the just a reason fed to the US and UK sheeple.he claimed he had them, to bluff Iran and the US. smart move, Saddam. he invited Dracula into his house.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/07/02/us-iran-saddam-idUSTRE56113O20090702