Hillary Clinton

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
35% approval rating

She thinks she's viable for 2020

I think she will manipulate the DNC again for that election, especially without any pressure not to..

Virtually whatever candidate that is up for election in 2020 is going to win against Trump, that's almost a given...

If Hillary Clinton is the candidate against Donald Trump in 2020, I won't vote for her because she is corrupt.

I won't vote for her because she has nothing to offer progressive's.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
35% approval rating

She thinks she's viable for 2020

I think she will manipulate the DNC again for that election, especially without any pressure not to..

Virtually whatever candidate that is up for election in 2020 is going to win against Trump, that's almost a given...

If Hillary Clinton is the candidate against Donald Trump in 2020, I won't vote for her because she is corrupt.

I won't vote for her because she has nothing to offer progressive's.
there is no apostrophe in "progressives" and you can't name one way in which she is corrupt.

and her approval ratings hover around the 60-65% range when she is not running for office, an action which apparently threatens insecure males like yourself.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
there is no apostrophe in "progressives" and you can't name one way in which she is corrupt.

and her approval ratings hover around the 60-65% range when she is not running for office, an action which apparently threatens insecure males like yourself.
Complete desperation. Isn't it time to face the facts?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Complete desperation. Isn't it time to face the facts?
fact: there is no apostrophe in "progressives"
fact: hillary clinton is not corrupt
fact: hillary clinton's approval rating stays in the 60s wheen she is not running for office
fact: you are an insecure male

take your pick, beta boi.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Fact: you are a dumbass

People seemingly love her when they don't believe she'll have any control over their lives, but as soon as they do, they hate her! Yeah, dipshit, that really supports your case!
i must have missed the part where you disproved any one of my facts.

i noticed you didn;t even bother trying to rebut the fact that you are an insecure male. your wisest move today.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
i must have missed the part where you disproved any one of my facts.

i noticed you didn;t even bother trying to rebut the fact that you are an insecure male. your wisest move today.
Your opinions are not facts. Learn the difference if you ever wish to graduate to the adults table.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Your opinions are not facts. Learn the difference if you ever wish to graduate to the adults table.
if they are not facts, then just show that they are not facts. i made 4 factual claims.

fact: there is no apostrophe in "progressives"
fact: hillary clinton is not corrupt
fact: hillary clinton's approval rating stays in the 60s wheen she is not running for office
fact: you are an insecure male

have at it, beta boi.
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Seems to me she'd be 180° opposite of Trump.

Anybody have a problem with 180° opposite of Trump?

Trump's corruption revolves around Russians and obstruction of justice.

I've never been quite clear on the Hillary corruption.

I never heard of any charges filed, I always hear of politically biased complaints from the fake news conspiracy theory wing nut crowd.

I think unproven conspiracy theory is a waste of time and fake news is utter nonsense.

I also don't think she'll be running in 2020.

What's this thread about?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Seems to me she'd be 180° opposite of Trump.
Sure. Probably when it comes to LGBT rights, abortion, etc.

Not when it comes to economics; tax policy

Anybody have a problem with 180° opposite of Trump?
A 90° pivot is not the same as opposite of Trump
Trump's corruption revolves around Russians and obstruction of justice.
No, it revolves around DNC corruption and media collusion. If the DNC and the Clinton campaign didn't do anything wrong, the Russians wouldn't have had anything to leak, if indeed the Russians are even responsible for the initial leaks in the first place as there's not been any evidence presented that supports that idea.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Seems to me she'd be 180° opposite of Trump.

Anybody have a problem with 180° opposite of Trump?

Trump's corruption revolves around Russians and obstruction of justice.

I've never been quite clear on the Hillary corruption.

I never heard of any charges filed, I always hear of politically biased complaints from the fake news conspiracy theory wing nut crowd.

I think unproven conspiracy theory is a waste of time and fake news is utter nonsense.

I also don't think she'll be running in 2020.

What's this thread about?
hello-bear.gif
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sure. Probably when it comes to LGBT rights, abortion, etc.

Not when it comes to economics
ok, you go pay for $7000 worth of prenatal care after your partner is denied military benefits because they are gay and you tell me it's not an economic issue.

if indeed the Russians are even responsible for the initial leaks in the first place as there's not been any evidence presented that supports that idea.
too radicalized to fact.
 

ZaraBeth420

Well-Known Member
fact: there is no apostrophe in "progressives"
fact: hillary clinton is not corrupt
fact: hillary clinton's approval rating stays in the 60s wheen she is not running for office
fact: you are an insecure male

take your pick, beta boi.
Facts one and four are true for sure.

fact: wheen is not a word. I think you meant "when". Yes?
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Sure. Probably when it comes to LGBT rights, abortion, etc.
Etc.? That must be a hell of a lot.

No, it revolves around DNC corruption and media collusoion. If the DNC and the Clinton campaign didn't do anything wrong, the Russians wouldn't have had anything to leak, if indeed the Russians are even responsible for the initial leaks in the first place as there's not been any evidence presented that supports that idea.
Chicken shit nit picking. Politics have always been dirty.

Trump is already the worst president in fucking history but you'd rather talk about Hillary?

And pretend she's as bad as Trump?

OK, then.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Etc.? That must be a hell of a lot.



Chicken shit nit picking. Politics have always been dirty.

Trump is already the worst president in fucking history but you'd rather talk about Hillary?

And pretend she's as bad as Trump?

OK, then.
it's easy to tell who the idiots are when trump is destroying not only the nation, but also our standing in the world, and certain people are making threads about hillary clinton and obama's book deal.

definitely not allies.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Trump is already the worst president in fucking history but you'd rather talk about Hillary?
Yes, I would.

You don't seem to get it..

We got the worst president in history because Hillary Clinton and the Democratic party ignored the will of working people.

She ran her campaign on "At least I'm not as bad as Donald Trump!" and failed.

If Democrats run on the same message in 2020, they will likely fail again.

Democrats need to have a solid, progressive, platform to win.
 
Top