zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.
FlyLikeAnEagle said:
Who is the mod in this group and why are my posts being removed?
Click to expand...

I am the one who did so, and for needless and vulgar insult. If you wish to complain about my actions, i invite you to do so. The man to find for that is rollitup.

If you feel that your post contains postworthy bits, I recommend omitting the part where you say "you retarded fuck" to your interlocutor. cn
 
cannabineer said:
I am the one who did so, and for needless and vulgar insult. If you wish to complain about my actions, i invite you to do so. The man to find for that is rollitup.

If you feel that your post contains postworthy bits, I recommend omitting the part where you say "you retarded fuck" to your interlocutor. cn
Click to expand...


If you're going to enforce that rule then you need to apply it unilaterally, not with just those you disagree with. I could spend less than a minute on here and find dozens of posts that have 'vulgar insults', not to mention I was responding to an insult directed towards me. So why do you allow other 'vulgar insults' to stay?????

Its no wonder this board is being overran with bigots and racists that spew hateful crap non stop with your obvious bias.
 
FlyLikeAnEagle said:
If you're going to enforce that rule then you need to apply it unilaterally, not with just those you disagree with. I could spend less than a minute on here and find dozens of posts that have 'vulgar insults', not to mention I was responding to an insult directed towards me. So why do you allow other 'vulgar insults' to stay?????

Its no wonder this board is being overran with bigots and racists that spew hateful crap non stop with your obvious bias.
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahaha.

Stop calling Buck bad names.
 
FlyLikeAnEagle said:
If you're going to enforce that rule then you need to apply it unilaterally, not with just those you disagree with. I could spend less than a minute on here and find dozens of posts that have 'vulgar insults', not to mention I was responding to an insult directed towards me. So why do you allow other 'vulgar insults' to stay?????

Its no wonder this board is being overran with bigots and racists that spew hateful crap non stop with your obvious bias.
Click to expand...

While I agree there are some posts that should be taken out, there is also a really big thread here in the politics section and you cant really expect a mod to read through every page. Hell me and ub was at it a day or so ago, and both of our posts have been deleted. I believe it was on page 77. Do I care? No, and the reason why is because it doesn't matter. Besides, UB is on here like every second of everyday and I'm sure he got to see what you posted. Hell, if it makes you feel any better, he probably reported it and that is the reason it got deleted, which should make you feel even better because you got the best of the #1 troll on RIU. :clap: Either way, CN is a pretty good dude, and I don't remotely see him as unfair, and that is more than likely the reason they made him a mod.
 
Perhaps I should modify the statement a bit as I see you are correct.
I sometimes have to force myself to distance from a subject just so I can see it from another angle.
If you always look at a problem straight on, it may be impossible to see anothers perspective.
 
FlyLikeAnEagle said:
If you're going to enforce that rule then you need to apply it unilaterally, not with just those you disagree with. I could spend less than a minute on here and find dozens of posts that have 'vulgar insults', not to mention I was responding to an insult directed towards me. So why do you allow other 'vulgar insults' to stay?????

Its no wonder this board is being overran with bigots and racists that spew hateful crap non stop with your obvious bias.
Click to expand...
There is a gradation. Not every insult or vulgarity qualifies; that way lies vigilantism. I do make an effort to apply the standard to all here. Necessarily it will be somewhat uneven. I am a bear after all. If you can do better, apply for the position. Competition is healthy. cn

bear_sign.jpg
 
Red1966 said:
If Martin had his hand over Zimmerman's hand, he may not have even touched the gun itself. Regardless, tell us some more about how you predicted a hung jury (or is it now acquittal) all along? That's always good for a laugh.
Click to expand...

That's not the story either.....the only real story it that Zim got knocked on his ass, a tussle ensued and Zim shot Trvon when Trevon, Zim said, "became aware of the gun."

So, there is a big tap dance about that gun, as, after the fact top cover and buzz words. IAC, I'm going off for a motorcycle ride in the Mountains. So, ya'll have fun.
 
Red1966 said:
So now you're saying he should have already known the address even tho it was (maybe) already on the other side of the building? You just contradicted your prior claim. So how did you get "again"/ Oh, right, you just made it up. You want to convict Zimmerman based solely on the victim's race, and I'm the racist? Clearly, you are just blathering nonsense. I shall waste no more time correcting your bullshit, racist lies. No one here believes anything you say except for a few other like minded bigots, who are more than likely your alternate identities. Its really sad how you have to make up imaginary friends. Not exactly surprising tho.
Click to expand...

No. Did you watch the re-enactement only once? :) He is covering up. He had no reason but one to get out his car. All that about addresses was lies and the cops already confronted him and the jury heard the tape.

Slanted sources lead to and from, a slanted view point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top