I would feel it would be equal if people would stop being so scared of just letting them get married. What would changing your precious definition to protect all people of this country do to hurt you?
i have not been reduced to michelle bachmann, you have. and it is because you use the same logic as her.
It has nothing to do with fear nor would redefining marriage "protect" anyone.
So much for your claim of logic...
lol.
"All man are created equal, unless of course they are homosexual, than they are sub par equal and that is how our government views them so therefore the American people should to"
The whole idea of civil unions is to get the same benefits without redefining marriage. That's how.
dammit UB. Have you even looked at his comment to you in another topic yet? lol..
Why is it so wrong to redefine marriage so that everyone is viewed as equals?The whole idea of civil unions is to get the same benefits without redefining marriage. That's how.
Would you feel better (or special) if only gays could get civil unions?
Gay men can marry women just like straight men can. Equal.
watch what she says. you use her exact same logic.
Right, but under that philosophy straight men can marry somebody they love, gay men cannot. Not equal.Gay men can marry women just like straight men can. Equal.
how about only straight people get civil unions and gay people get marriage?The whole idea of civil unions is to get the same benefits without redefining marriage. That's how.
Would you feel better (or special) if only gays could get civil unions?
Redefining would make special rights not equal rights.
blacks didn't have to put up with slavery if they painted themselves white by your logic.Gay men can marry women just like straight men can. Equal.
How so?(10)
Love isn't a requirement for marriage. It's a good idea but not a requirement based on results.
