Man you are giving some very interesting data here. Does it mens what I think: Freezing is not as good as many think to say the least.Here's something else to think about.
RESULTS: All Quantisal OF cannabinoid concentrations were stable for 1 week at 4 °C. After 4 weeks at 4 °C, as well as 4 and 24 weeks at -20 °C, THC was stable in 90%, 80%, and 80% and THCCOOH in 89%, 40%, and 50% of Quantisal samples, respectively. Cannabinoids in expectorated OF were less stable than in Quantisal samples when refrigerated or frozen. After 4 weeks at 4 and -20 °C, CBD and CBN were stable in 33%-100% of Quantisal and expectorated samples; by 24 weeks at -20 °C, CBD and CBN were stable in ≤ 44%.
Suggesting decarbed hash has a longer shelf life. And the others were pretty varied
The flavors of Hash around the world varies from country to country, unique to the country with variations due mainly to the place of origin in the country and the quality.The heads don't contain any moisture once the moisture leaves terpenes go with it, as I said earlier because of this it needs to be kept below 75 degrees. Traditional hash doesn't have the same flavors its always going to be spicier and well taste hashy, just my my opinion...I make shatter because pure thc is a solid at room temp or slightly chilled all the terpines remain trapped until it is warmed and becomes a liquid. In my personal opinion that gives the best flavor while being pure cannabinoids and terpines, thc itself being a terpine, the only way to extract all terpines/cannabinoids and with the least plant matter/ impurities. Pressed hash inherently provides a more sedative high, while I grow landrace sativas. So I'm not knocking your method its just not for me. Thc is clear the darker and more it degrades it turns gold then amber then brown. I've never seen traditional hash not look severely degraded.
Have you tried pressing with more pressure or without heat..how does that affect the hash. I think maybe pressing without the heat might help preserve it. But I've never done any experimenting with traditional hash methods
But the pressing itself has a lot to do with the smoothness
I have seen lab testing of cured and uncured buds, they get mire potent with the cure, thca decarbs at like a 70% ratio to thc. So lab testing looking at thc percentages will be higher but as I said before your lighter decarbs as well, doing it twice is simply degrading, so undecarbed bud with lower thc percentages but higher thca and thc percentages will give more thc when lit..
Do you decarb your shatter by the way?Here's something else to think about.
RESULTS: All Quantisal OF cannabinoid concentrations were stable for 1 week at 4 °C. After 4 weeks at 4 °C, as well as 4 and 24 weeks at -20 °C, THC was stable in 90%, 80%, and 80% and THCCOOH in 89%, 40%, and 50% of Quantisal samples, respectively. Cannabinoids in expectorated OF were less stable than in Quantisal samples when refrigerated or frozen. After 4 weeks at 4 and -20 °C, CBD and CBN were stable in 33%-100% of Quantisal and expectorated samples; by 24 weeks at -20 °C, CBD and CBN were stable in ≤ 44%.
Suggesting decarbed hash has a longer shelf life. And the others were pretty varied
Seriously guys and girls, how many time do I have to say that this is YOUR site as much as mine?Well what do ya wanna know? I could pump this thread with seemingly useless knowledge but I'm not sure frenchy would approve
(Edit) no answer and I'm bored so figured I would throw out 240 days seems to be optimum cure length.. for potency at least, that's when thca is finished decarbing and your now losing potency..
Another, towards the end of this link is a lot of info relating to biosynthesis thc production and environmental factors specifically how UV light increases thc production through cbda, also discussing other cannabinoids and some good info on the later stages in life cycle. I would read the whole second half..again in a pretty understandable format..
http://www.kindgreenbuds.com/marijuana-grow-guide/cannabis_maturation_harvesting.html
THC is a cannabinoid not a terpene as far as I know. Have I been wrong all this time or what???Well I suppose it depends on what your aiming for, maximum potency or flavor. A cure enhances aroma by altering terpenes, thc is a terpene. Like thc the other terpenes can be psychoactive/alter the high or change onset and metabolism ect also with a lot of medicinal properties....technically though there are more and more pshyshoactive cannabinoids in fresh bud. I personally make hash at harvest with fresh frozen material. I'm not telling you to do that though I use solvents...
I probly should have said day 240 is the cut off point in a cure for potency. After that its becoming less psychoactive even if more flavorful..though I've never been able to keep bud around that long lol
Do you remember the terpenes bounding to the cannabinoids, did not get CA articles but came across that:All cannabinoids are terpenes, not all terpenes are cannabinoids....I believe that number to be have been calculated after determining a sort of "half life" of thca. So they did the tests as resin slabs and in ethanol solution. Determining after 240 days all thca had been converted to thc..but don't confuse me with those whack bho makers
Oh yes I would like very much because I am quite confused for the moment but learning so a very happy FrenchyIf you want a real study or something saying so I'll put up some more info in the morning. But terpenes that act on cb receptors make them cannabinoids, most are synergesic. Though when dry or in hash/oleoresin form they become volatile at about 75 degrees as quoted in a link I put up. Under a 100 realistically for lighter monoterpenes. Some like thc and sesquiterpenes stick around . I'll give real studies and better detailin the morning
Many of them have similar properties degrading in light, thc even in pretty good conditions degrades a lot after 1 year its reasonable to believe that similar terpines act the same