I know what you mean, the curriculum of most school systems lack any in depth study of world history, sure there may be a week or two set aside for discussion but it rarely gets more attention until later in college/university when one chooses to study it purposely. Schools are tools IMO, they aid you in the quest for knowledge, they are a basic tool at the beginning, providing just what is necessary for you to survive and adapt. It is only when you decide "what" to study does the school/s true form takes shape.This is one part of history we are not exposed to (at least as children) in America, and probably many other countries. So to be amazed at my amazement in someone we were never even told about in school, while we spent an entire YEAR on US history, is rediculous. They couldn't mention Hannibal? We've all at least HEARD of Alexander the Great. Not saying Hannibal should be considered US history, I'm saying a year on US history is not interesting, while any amount of talking about Hannibal would have been interesting.
I think schools need to become more involved with each other, and letting kids use the tools they already walk in the door with (cell phone, etc) this is the age of the Internet, the fact that I never once had a webcam discussion with another classroom in another country, or shared a project with a class in another state kinda like disgusts me. Why aren't we doing that yet, education should start in the streets and at government buildings, and grow into class groups, instead of randomly throwing people into classes based on age.I know what you mean, the curriculum of most school systems lack any in depth study of world history, sure there may be a week or two set aside for discussion but it rarely gets more attention until later in college/university when one chooses to study it purposely. Schools are tools IMO, they aid you in the quest for knowledge, they are a basic tool at the beginning, providing just what is necessary for you to survive and adapt. It is only when you decide "what" to study does the school/s true form takes shape.
Plus, Hannibal is noted for caring about his soldiers, ie: the Gisgo quote. I know I'm talking about specific people that were in charge of the projects, but I have mentioned their relatives and subordinates, but as I said before, there is not a lot of in depth records of Hannibal, let alone each individual that served under him.Fin, history is full of fascinating individuals and to see you {or anyone for that matter} take such an interest in our shared past is good.
It is one thing to read about history, yet to walk away with nothing but amazement some how belittles the lives it cost to make such idols, for every Alexander and Khan there are countless slain, for every flag unfurled there is blood spilled.
History is a lesson and one that all should learn from, IMO
I have often wondered how it is that every man loves himself more than all the rest of men, but yet sets less value on his own opinions of himself than on the opinions of others.
Marcus Aurelius
That's just because Google is fine, and sometimes (usually I have seen it when doing RC searches) Google incorporates google scholar. Why would you make such a distinction? I still think classrooms need to connect, what I said had nothing to do with kids learning from google. But google is fine when you know what it is you're looking for.Not to trivialize your response Fin but my guess would something we call, Teen Angst. With the mass overload of useless and often incorrect information that is being sent around the web, it's hard to find the information that will give you the right answer. It's true that the internet is a invaluable key for today's youth and their studies but if you're unable to comprehend that information and use it properly then what good is it to have the world at your beck and call so to speak.
I asked my nephew who studies at one of the local universities, where he gets his information when studying, he replied "google, it's a great help", then I said "Oh so you use google scholar then, cool so do I"...he looked at me as if I had three heads.
He wasn't even aware it existed.
I think this should be separated. Everyone should look up the Grimaldi man, VERY little is known about them.Look up "The Grimaldi Man". Like 20,000 years ago Africans brought fire to the cavemen, and the symbol of the dragon, which Asia has heavily adopted.
Maybe it's too much for one person, but learning it from a western perspective is really the worst way.I can see your point, but I believe the amount of knowledge man has acquired over time is too vast for one individual to take in. As for now it seems we will be educated based on geography.
You're getting your history backwards, and Lucy has what anthropologists and archaeologists call "negroid" skulls, as well as the Grimaldi man, which has been dated as 20,000 years old (older than Lucy). And that's not me using a racist term, that just proves western perspective is inherently racist. The bible even tries to say, "everything has its own 'kind'." And in the early 1900's people took that into a racial perspective, then that became a religious perspective as well. Look at Mormons, they were started in the 1800's, and they changed their bible in like 1970 something because it was crazy racist. Mormon preachers used to be racist as well. Look up videos about Mormon racism on YouTube.Although "Lucy" was found to be from Africa, I don't think pigmentation had reached the point where you could call her black.
To the victor belong the spoils.