see4
Well-Known Member
Im reading The Art of War for the 15th* time right now..
* denotes an estimation.
Wow
- Thread starter Finshaggy
- Start date
- Status
* denotes an estimation.
I thought the use of a smile was vestigial apex predator behavior, ie baring our fangs.....
Don't get to comfy just yet
we are in the midst of a very odd cool spell .. this will break soon and temps will return to normal. But then it will merely be a dry heat...... grrrrrrrr...
see4
Well-Known Member
When my flight landed Saturday night at 9:40pm PST, it was 102 degrees. That, in no way, shape or form is cool. lol.Don't get to comfy just yet
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
aw yes but the complexities of the muscles and social aspects to the smile makje it that much more
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
The Bible claims animals are inferior because they don't have the ability to reason. So I think this is proof of the opposite.i have to post this here, aa frog knowing that a leaf will help it from the rain shows so much intelligence on part of this creature. if this doesnt prove God i dont no what does
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
He learned at the same time that he taught. He ran into the feilds of Italy, starting fires and pillaging, for no better reason than to get the militaries attention. He had no idea it would have the effect it had, he just wanted to kill some Romans.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Once you're done reading about Hannibal, if you need more cool stuff to read, look up Imhotep.
They need to do more research on Hannibal though, there isn't enough to read about him. Most of the "research" is focused on 3 written Roman accounts. And Hannibal was like Rome's biggest enemy, so they probably don't give Hannibal the credit he is due.
They need to do more research on Hannibal though, there isn't enough to read about him. Most of the "research" is focused on 3 written Roman accounts. And Hannibal was like Rome's biggest enemy, so they probably don't give Hannibal the credit he is due.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
I think that frog is trying to rape a leaf. What does that have to do with the bible?
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
the bible also says that you are a sinner and a idolater(me too by the way) . . .so all points are moot if the bible is the pretense
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
I think that has to do more with psychology than the bible, and the way you personally see things.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Lol, well we are all "sinners", unless we never eat too much, or save too much, or get drunk, or "spill your seed".
But I think the picture makes the bible moot, the bible doesn't shut it down. It tries to, but it's a picture.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Btw, most of Hannibal's conquest is accredited to him, but he has tons of family members to read about as well. 2 or 3 of them even served under him as officers or something, and were instrumental in all Hannibal's ambushes. Which as I said before, I believe we're not meant to purely be ambushes, but were actually a way to run into battle blindly, without ending his bloodline. Giving his men (family) a chance to see if the battle is hopeless before running in.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Lol, why does it have to be about who would win in a fight? And I'm pretty sure Khan could have beat Hannibal too. But those two aren't as purely awesome as Hannibal.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
When Hannibal defies odds, it's "headstrong", but Alexander the Great (also awesome, just more obviously a "conquerer". Which is fine, but tremendously less interesting than a story of a man with no faith using his dead family to fuel a rebellion across the empire)...
"The divine right that Alexander believed he had gave him confidence of a miracle occurring." From stories about his conquering Egypt, only about 100 years before Hannibal was born in that area.
"The divine right that Alexander believed he had gave him confidence of a miracle occurring." From stories about his conquering Egypt, only about 100 years before Hannibal was born in that area.
MojoRison
Well-Known Member
Fin, history is full of fascinating individuals and to see you {or anyone for that matter} take such an interest in our shared past is good.
It is one thing to read about history, yet to walk away with nothing but amazement some how belittles the lives it cost to make such idols, for every Alexander and Khan there are countless slain, for every flag unfurled there is blood spilled.
History is a lesson and one that all should learn from, IMO
I have often wondered how it is that every man loves himself more than all the rest of men, but yet sets less value on his own opinions of himself than on the opinions of others.
Marcus Aurelius
It is one thing to read about history, yet to walk away with nothing but amazement some how belittles the lives it cost to make such idols, for every Alexander and Khan there are countless slain, for every flag unfurled there is blood spilled.
History is a lesson and one that all should learn from, IMO
I have often wondered how it is that every man loves himself more than all the rest of men, but yet sets less value on his own opinions of himself than on the opinions of others.
Marcus Aurelius
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
This is one part of history we are not exposed to (at least as children) in America, and probably many other countries. So to be amazed at my amazement in someone we were never even told about in school, while we spent an entire YEAR on US history, is rediculous. They couldn't mention Hannibal? We've all at least HEARD of Alexander the Great. Not saying Hannibal should be considered US history, I'm saying a year on US history is not interesting, while any amount of talking about Hannibal would have been interesting.
- Status