Repirations for slavery

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
"Reparations" will be used as a talking point to gain votes.

What many people who might receive money from reparations may not be considering is, they will be on the hook for it.

If SUCKERS understood where "government money" (debt) comes from, inflation etc. they'd be laughing at this scam.

Click to expand...
The economics expert who believes the barter system would help us haslogged on, folks
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Seems you can't get a handle of what is being said.

I support equals rights for all without discrimination. I support if a place is open to the public, it shall not refuse service base on race, gender, religion..
Please notice the key phrase is " open to the public " because it shatters your force-servitude argument. If you don't want to serve all, DO NOT BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. You do have a choice.

I also believe a child of 12 cannot concent to sex with an adult. No middle ground. No " what if she is really mature for her age. NO FUCKING NOTHING.

You on the other hand support a racist being able to tell a black person to get their "n" ass out his/her store, ( which is open to the public) due to color of skin.
You support a bigoted store owner having rights to kick your own dear sweet, beautiful, caring, loving, mother out a store open to the public due to her being female
You also think a 12 year old can concent to sex in some cases.
Click to expand...
Oh dear, you're wrong again.

It is impossible to "support equal rights" and also tell people who they must or must not associate with.

If people are equal, then each person would be self determining. If people were self determining, it is self evident that any human relations between people which are mutually desired, would maintain equality, whereas human relations which occur that are not mutually desired destroy equality.

I could turn that into a simple math equation for you, if you'd like.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Oh dear, you're wrong again.

It is impossible to "support equal rights" and also tell people who they must or must not associate with.

If people are equal, then each person would be self determining. If people were self determining, it is self evident that any human relations between people which are mutually desired, would maintain equality, whereas human relations which occur that are not mutually desired destroy equality.

I could turn that into a simple math equation for you, if you'd like.
Click to expand...
The guy who thinks civil rights are slavery has logged on to teach us about equality, folks
 
tstick

tstick

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you would know US history and you confirmed that I was wrong. You were ignorant. So, why does your opinion matter?
Click to expand...
Yeah, well first of all, I DO know some U.S. history -probably about the same as the average American. Maybe you take a special interest in certain aspects of U.S. history and have studied those a bit more than I? That's okay. But let's be honest, here...You gambled on the idea that I probably wouldn't know as much as you about this particular facet of history, so your question was rhetorical and only meant as a setup so that you could justify spewing another insulting response. I can be mean, too. But what good does it do? It only perpetuates meanness.

Your opinion really doesn't matter, either. It won't make any more difference than mine, in the big picture....especially considering that we are discussing history and sociology on a website dedicated to weed!
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
The guy who thinks civil rights are slavery has logged on to teach us about equality, folks
Click to expand...

When an unwilling neutral person is threatened with harm if they fail to serve another person they prefer not to, it's not a form of slavery ?

Please define the characteristics that make slavery, slavery, slave.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
tstick said:
Yeah, well first of all, I DO know some U.S. history -probably about the same as the average American. Maybe you take a special interest in certain aspects of U.S. history and have studied those a bit more than I? That's okay. But let's be honest, here...You gambled on the idea that I probably wouldn't know as much as you about this particular facet of history, so your question was rhetorical and only meant as a setup so that you could justify spewing another insulting response. I can be mean, too. But what good does it do? It only perpetuates meanness.

Your opinion really doesn't matter, either. It won't make any more difference than mine, in the big picture....especially considering that we are discussing history and sociology on a website dedicated to weed!
Click to expand...
You just said you were ignorant. I take you at your word. It is consistent with what you said here too.

Your opinion is biased and worthless. No reply is necessary.
 
tstick

tstick

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You just said you were ignorant. I take you at your word. It is consistent with what you said here too.

Your opinion is biased and worthless. No reply is necessary.
Click to expand...
Oh, it's no problem for me to reply. :)

I never said that I was ignorant. If I said that, then post the quote. But you can't and, thus, you are just making things up and paraphrasing to fit in with your incredibly unnecessary attitude.

ALL opinions are biased. That's the very nature of an opinion. As far as the value of my opinion....It's worth as much as anyone else's. And you are not the judge of all opinions.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
tstick said:
Oh, it's no problem for me to reply. :)

I never said that I was ignorant. If I said that, then post the quote. But you can't and, thus, you are just making things up and paraphrasing to fit in with your incredibly unnecessary attitude.

ALL opinions are biased. That's the very nature of an opinion. As far as the value of my opinion....It's worth as much as anyone else's. And you are not the judge of all opinions.
Click to expand...
this message is being sent to inform you that your message was received.

No reply is necessary.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
When an unwilling neutral person is threatened with harm if they fail to serve another person they prefer not to, it's not a form of slavery ?

Please define the characteristics that make slavery, slavery, slave.
Click to expand...
Being owned by another human
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
tstick said:
I know it's not necessary....but it would be my pleasure, all the same, so please accept this reply, gratis! :)
Click to expand...
This message is being sent to inform you that your message was received.

do not reply to this message.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
History of Reparations Payment

1990- U.S.A $1.6 Billion or 20,000 Each JAPANESE AMERICAN

1990 - AUSTRIA $25 Million to Holocaust Survivors Jewish Claims of Austria

1988 - CANADA 250,000 sq. miles of land INDIAN & ESKIMOS

1988- CANADA $230 Million JAPANESE CANADIANS

1986- U.S.A $32 Million 1839 Treaty OTTAWAS OF MICHIGAN

1985- U.S.A $31 Million CHIPPEWAS OF WISCONSIN

1985- U.S.A $12.3 Million SEMINOLES OF FLORIDA

1985 - U.S.A $105 Million SIOUX OF SOUTH DAKOTA

1980 - U.S.A $81Million KLAMATHS OF OREGON

1971 - U.S.A $1 Billion+44 Million Acres of Land ALASKA NATIVES LAND SETTLEMNET

1952 - GERMANY $822 Million to Holocaust Survivors GERMAN JEWISH SETTLEMENT

1865- present - U.S.A $0 AFRICAN AMERICAN BLACK DECENDANTS
Click to expand...


I'm not sure about the rest of your chart, but wasn't the payment made to Japanese Americans made to surviving people who actually were forcibly incarcerated as a result of FDR's racist edict to violate their constitutional rights during WWII? FDR was a real loser and racist.

Shouldn't FDR's estate have made that payment ? Why should "tax payers" (slaves) who had nothing to do with FDR's Stalinesque move be held responsible for it ?

If some random black guy somewhere commits rape or murder, should all black people be held responsible for it ? I don't think that makes sense, it sounds racist to me.

We already know, you'd force a black guy to serve you and now I'm thinking you'd force a black guy to pay for crimes he didn't commit. Is that accurate?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top