Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
In 1767 the British government ceded land in northern New Brunswick to my family as reparation for deporting them from Acadia
I'm still wondering what repirations are. Is it like if you were previously a pirate and then you reformed and stopped being a pirate and then someone made you be a pirate again. Would that be a repiration? If you were then a slave pirate, would that be a repiration for slavery?
It is a misspelling of the word " reparations" that most of us ignored because the topic is one of importance. Would be nice if it was spelled correctly but should not take away from the conversation.I'm still wondering what repirations are. Is it like if you were previously a pirate and then you reformed and stopped being a pirate and then someone made you be a pirate again. Would that be a repiration? If you were then a slave pirate, would that be a repiration for slavery?
You support pedophiles and have the same views of a racist. Take a day or two to think about thatThat's exactly what happened to light hitting infielder Tim Foli when the Pittsburgh Pirates reacquired him in 1985.
He never made much money compared to the players today, definitely deserves some reparations.
Different type of slavery,Man, if this idea of reparations catches on, then the Romans are really going to be in for it!
Up to six in ten articles on Wikipedia contain inaccuracies, according to new research.From wiki wiki ;
Between 1502 and 1866, of the 11.2 million Africans, only 388,000 arrived in the United States, while the rest arrived in Latin America and the Caribbean These slaves were brought as early as the 16th and 17th centuries.
You will notice that of those 364 years, the British were in charge for all but 103 of them.
Also of interest is the fact that almost all of the slavers were from New England. The first ships sailed from New England in the 1640's.
I don't like pedophiles or racists and don't agree with their choices. So your statement is sort of a non sequitur to the reparations conversation, however in fairness (to me) I should point out a few things about your contradictory ideas.You support pedophiles and have the same views of a racist. Take a day or two to think about that
Seems you can't get a handle of what is being said.I don't like pedophiles or racists and don't agree with their choices. So your statement is sort of a non sequitur to the reparations conversation, however in fairness (to me) I should point out a few things about your contradictory ideas.
You support forced servitude and have the same view as a group of gang rapists, who have little regard for peaceful individual rights. You are unable to form a coherent argument rebutting that...since it's absolutely accurate.
You are okay with forcing a neutral person to serve another person against their will, if a "majority" has somehow decided it's okay. Can you deny that ? No, you can't.
Are you okay with forcible redistribution based on race too?
Isn't that a racist point of view?
Different type of slavery,
be careful your stupid is showing
it doesn't matter....history has no meaning to some people.From wiki wiki ;
Between 1502 and 1866, of the 11.2 million Africans, only 388,000 arrived in the United States, while the rest arrived in Latin America and the Caribbean These slaves were brought as early as the 16th and 17th centuries.
You will notice that of those 364 years, the British were in charge for all but 103 of them.
Also of interest is the fact that almost all of the slavers were from New England. The first ships sailed from New England in the 1640's.
Well my spelling corrections are usually done by @Rob Roy , but you are free to be my spelling correction bitch if you so desire. If you are going to point it out please show the corrections . Thanks Bitch."I also believe a child of 12 cannot concent to sex with an adult. No middle ground. No " what if she is really mature for her age. NO FUCKING NOTHING."
"You also think a 12 year old can concent to sex in some cases."
"Consent"....You did it twice, so it wasn't a typo! ...Be careful. Your stupid is showing.
I didn't realize that slavery had been broken down into specific categories. I do know that slavery had been going on around the world for thousands of years prior to the American slave trade. I used Rome as my example because their conquests, and subsequent enslavement of their prisoners as a result of those conquests, helped shape the modern world -as did the Chinese enslavement of otherChinese...or the Egyptians enslavement of other Africans.....and so on and so on. It seems that enslavement has been part of the evolution of humanity and civilization. So, if America is to be expected to make reparations, then it seems that the whole world should start making reparations. Or, we can chalk it up to history and societal evolution and move on to solving the present problems with society rather than perseverating on problems of the past.
please do tell where slaves where in America prior to 1619. Please have link to your information. Who brought the slaves over, where did they get them from prior to 1619. Who where these slaves prior to the Dutch company bring over the 20 Africans.it doesn't matter....history has no meaning to some people.
from the early 1500s Europeans had been slaving as an industry. by 1560, the Caribbean and the coast of South America was full of European slaves... working for Europeans...
so that whole "America started slavery in 1619" thing is bullshit. there were already slaves in the "Americas" well before 1619, and they weren't brought by or owned by Americans.
this in no way absolves our ancestors of any guilt, but i like to be damned for facts, and not assumptions...and it just abrogates those peoples existence...slavery didn't exist until 1619...those people didn't exist till 1619...so their suffering is inconsequential....at least inconsequential to people who don't bother to learn the truth...
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/misguided-focus-1619-beginning-slavery-us-damages-our-understanding-american-history-180964873/
no...just no...the Spanish and Portuguese were the actual prime movers and shakers in the early days then the British took dominance and maintained it till the trade ended. if any Jews were majorly involved in the slave trade, it was as a business that was as legitimate at the time as any other business...they neither started it nor dominated itDidnt jews control/own majority slave trade?
Jewish Involvement Inno...just no...the Spanish and Portuguese were the actual prime movers and shakers in the early days then the British took dominance and maintained it till the trade ended. if any Jews were majorly involved in the slave trade, it was as a business that was as legitimate at the time as any other business...they neither started it nor dominated it
there are enough issues in this thread without dragging Semitism into it, either pro or anti...
Now, now...settle down. Just pointing out that you're no one to be calling anyone stupid. I'm not sure what "Thank Bitch" is supposed to mean, either. lol! Anyway...Well my spelling corrections are usually done by @Rob Roy , but you are free to be my spelling correction bitch if you so desire. If you are going to point it out please show the corrections . Thank Bitch.
To help you on your ignorance of slavery, please Google chattel slavery and how it differs from slavery in ancient Rome as well as ancient Egypt.
As stated earlier ( in which I'm sure you did not read ) the payment would come from COMPANIES and FAMILIES that prospered off slavery then and up to this day. so it would not be AMERICA paying for reparations, so you can keep your pennies.
How can you move to solve todays problems when you have not solved or acknowledge the problems of the past ?
Settle down ? What makes you think I'm uptight ?Now, now...settle down. Just pointing out that you're no one to be calling anyone stupid. I'm not sure what "Thank Bitch" is supposed to mean, either. lol! Anyway...
If you are seriously asking my opinion as to how we can solve present problems without acknowledging the past problems, then my response is that we have already have acknowledged many of these past problems -slavery in particular ....many times. There really are no solutions. It happened. It was bad. It's acknowledged. We can't solve today's problems by wallowing in yesterday. We used to think that the galaxy revolved around the Earth. We were wrong. We learned more and eventually moved on to better understanding, later. Social evolution is much the same....We used to believe things that have subsequently shown us to be ignorant. We learned more and moved on. And if we want to keep driving forward, then we have to stop looking in the rear view mirror and stopping for piss breaks every five minutes.