January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-lawyer-christina-bobb-rsbn-midterms-republicans-election-2020-1723145

wow these fucking freaks never give up...when trump is dead, giving earth worms and maggots cancer, they'll still be trying to get his fat ass back into the white house...
i would be willing to give him a permanent place in the white house, or at least the extra large urn that holds his foul greasy orange ashes
If his urn ever showed up at the WH after he croaked, Joe would personally flush his ashes down the presidential toilet on TV! I would! :lol: It might take a couple of flushes, but it would be a good use of the water, his fans can hold memorials at the DC sewage treatment plant, maybe even erect a monument to stupidity there.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I'm waiting for Donald to market his own shit to his fans at $100 a gram $10K gets them a genuine complete Trump turd. He would sell other turds of course, I doubt even Donald could be productive enough to meet the demand of his millions of fans. Why not, he's sold them shit for years and they are still buying! Donald needs to get creative and tap his base way down deep. Maybe he would be busted tough for selling false turds and saying they are his own, they have DNA testing these days and someone might check. He's already facing potential wire fraud over the big steal, so it's just more shit he's selling, until he's finally busted. :lol:

Maybe he could even come out with edible versions for his hardcore fans! Since he will be in prison, many will miss having their noses shoved up his arse and this could help them with withdrawal!:lol:

Think Donald could sell turds and grams of shit to his fans? Think he would break a million grams in sales!
 

injinji

Well-Known Member
I'm waiting for Donald to market his own shit to his fans at $100 a gram $10K gets them a genuine complete Trump turd. He would sell other turds of course, I doubt even Donald could be productive enough to meet the demand of his millions of fans. Why not, he's sold them shit for years and they are still buying! Donald needs to get creative and tap his base way down deep. Maybe he would be busted tough for selling false turds and saying they are his own, they have DNA testing these days and someone might check. He's already facing potential wire fraud over the big steal, so it's just more shit he's selling, until he's finally busted. :lol:

Maybe he could even come out with edible versions for his hardcore fans! Since he will be in prison, many will miss having their noses shoved up his arse and this could help them with withdrawal!:lol:

Think Donald could sell turds and grams of shit to his fans? Think he would break a million grams in sales!
From what I hear, his solid turd days are in the past.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Foul and not always orange
View attachment 5162768
remember the days when any senator in the entire country wouldn't be seen dead at a white supremacist rally? they may have supported them behind the scenes, but they would have never made any kind of public appearance and goddamn sure they wouldn't have made a fucking speech...
the entire party is nothing but fascists thugs making a very sloppy power grab...time to remind them what happened to their founder

DeadMussolini.jpg
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I'm waiting for Donald to market his own shit to his fans at $100 a gram $10K gets them a genuine complete Trump turd. He would sell other turds of course, I doubt even Donald could be productive enough to meet the demand of his millions of fans. Why not, he's sold them shit for years and they are still buying! Donald needs to get creative and tap his base way down deep. Maybe he would be busted tough for selling false turds and saying they are his own, they have DNA testing these days and someone might check. He's already facing potential wire fraud over the big steal, so it's just more shit he's selling, until he's finally busted. :lol:

Maybe he could even come out with edible versions for his hardcore fans! Since he will be in prison, many will miss having their noses shoved up his arse and this could help them with withdrawal!:lol:

Think Donald could sell turds and grams of shit to his fans? Think he would break a million grams in sales!
unfortunately, yes, i think his fucked up moron followers would not only buy it, they would eat it...they've been swallowing his shit for years now.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

11 House Republicans attended a White House meeting with Trump to strategize about overturning the election results on January 6. Six of them later asked for pardons.

Bryan Metzger
21 hours ago


Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Matt Gaetz of Florida all attended the meeting, according to the committee.

Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia (a representative-elect at the time), and Matt Gaetz of Florida attended the meeting. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images
  • The White House held a December 21, 2020, meeting to discuss a fringe theory to overturn the election.
  • The January 6, 2021, committee shared the names of 11 House Republicans who went to that meeting.
  • They included Reps. Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, as well as Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene.
The House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, offered new details on Tuesday about a meeting at the White House that involved several Republican members of Congress ahead of the meeting of the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 presidential election.

Democratic Rep. Stephanie Murphy of Florida, a member of the committee, said the December 21 meeting was part of an effort to "disseminate his false claims and to encourage members of the public to fight the outcome on January 6."

Vice President Mike Pence, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff at the time, attended the meeting, along with President Donald Trump, Murphy said.

At the meeting, Murphy said the members discussed election theories pushed by Trump's personal lawyer John Eastman, who said he believed that Pence was able to single-handedly reject slates of electors in his role presiding over the joint session.

In reality, Pence's role was simply to count the votes. On Tuesday, the committee aired footage of Pat Cipollone, Trump's White House counsel. He was asked to address a comment attributed to him by another Trump advisor, Jason Miller, who quoted him as saying that Eastman's theory was "nutty." Cipollone declined to contradict that.

Cipollone said he tried to attend the meeting himself but was apparently turned away.

Here are the 11 House Republicans who were at the meeting, according to the White House visitor logs obtained by the January 6 panel:
  • Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama
  • Rep. Brian Babin of Texas
  • Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona
  • Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida
  • Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas
  • Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona
  • Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland
  • Rep. Jody Hice of Georgia
  • Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio
  • Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania
  • Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Garland May Not Want To Indict A Former President — But He Might Not Have A Choice
7,404 views Jul 13, 2022 Former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal joins Morning Joe to discuss the evidence presented by the January 6 committee Tuesday, and how effective it was to "draw a link" between extremist groups and White House officials. "I don't think Merrick Garland has a choice," Katyal says. "I'm sure he doesn't want to do this, be the first Attorney General in the history of the United States to indict a former president, but the evidence is what the evidence is."
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
I was wondering about that myself, it must be someone Trump dealt with personally and how did he get wind of it?
Did they change lawyers from his to their own?
How many are dropping or have dropped their Trump paid lawyers since the public hearings began?
Are his lawyers a party to witness intimidation and violation their lawyer client privilege for Trump?
Is it in their contracts that they have to inform him of all developments?
Or just the fact that they fired them for an obvious reason, they were not acting in their client's best interest, but in Trump's. This is unethical and probably illegal or should be, a suspect like Trump should not be allowed to pay the legal bills of witnesses.

We could hear direct testimony from someone in the room and they will name who else was present too. Trump knows them personally, he ignores the little people, they don't exist for him, they are just furniture, but this furniture can talk!
I think I found the "real truth"
"Newsmax’s Greg Kelly: Hey, Maybe Trump Just ‘Butt Dialed’ the Jan. 6 Witness":wall:
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Former Oath Keeper: ‘We came very, very close to having a civil war kick off on Jan. 6’
Former Oath Keepers spokesperson Jason Van Tatenhove on Wednesday said American came “very, very close” to a civil war when pro-Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in an attempt to prevent the certification of the 2020 election results.

Van Tatenhove, who testified Tuesday to the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol, told CNN’s Brianna Keilar that far-right militias like the Oath Keepers and other rioters had a “military mindset” on Jan. 6.

“I don’t know how far they’ve gotten into the endgame, but what we saw on January 6th is certainly very much how it would look to start out,” he said. “We came very, very close to having a civil war kick off on January 6th.”

Van Tatenhove, 47, is a longtime Colorado resident, former tattoo shop owner and independent journalist who first met Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes in 2014 when the militia leader traveled to support Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, who called for armed Americans to support him in a stand-off with the U.S. government.

After the Bundy Ranch episode, Rhodes, who has been charged with seditious conspiracy for his role in the Jan. 6 attack, hired Van Tatenhove as the militia organization’s publicist and spokesperson, a position he held for a couple years before quitting after several disputes.

On Tuesday, Van Tatenhove provided a historical overview of the Oath Keepers to the House panel investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, including saying that the Oath Keepers are a violent militia that dreamed of an insurrection like that which unfolded on Jan. 6.

While the House panel is presenting evidence about the events surrounding Jan. 6, the Department of Justice (DOJ) will ultimately decide whether to criminally prosecute former President Trump for his role in the Capitol attack.

Van Tatenhove predicted Rhodes and other far-right leaders would see the Department of Justice’s declination to file charges as a “win” for their movements, which he said have yet to be held accountable for standoffs such as that at Bundy Ranch, which saw the federal government back down.

Van Tatenhove told CNN Rhodes has a “fantasy” of organizing a para-military organization. The former Oath Keepers spokesperson says he sees a direct line between Bundy Ranch and Jan. 6.

He added the American public was failing to see the full picture of the Jan. 6 attack and that citizens should start “having hard conversations” about what happened on that day.

“I really do fear for what might happen if Trump gets back in office,” he told CNN. “In a lot of ways, we’ve been mincing words. When it comes to the events of January 6th, that was not some sort of peaceful protest. That was a violent mob, and people died. We need to really start calling things out for what they are.”
 

injinji

Well-Known Member
  • Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama
  • Rep. Brian Babin of Texas
  • Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona
  • Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida
  • Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas
  • Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona
  • Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland
  • Rep. Jody Hice of Georgia
  • Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio
  • Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania
  • Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
Glad only one from Florida. And Matt's stupidity is so big, it's been nationalized.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member

11 House Republicans attended a White House meeting with Trump to strategize about overturning the election results on January 6. Six of them later asked for pardons.

Bryan Metzger
21 hours ago


Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Matt Gaetz of Florida all attended the meeting, according to the committee.

Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia (a representative-elect at the time), and Matt Gaetz of Florida attended the meeting. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images
  • The White House held a December 21, 2020, meeting to discuss a fringe theory to overturn the election.
  • The January 6, 2021, committee shared the names of 11 House Republicans who went to that meeting.
  • They included Reps. Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, as well as Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene.
The House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, offered new details on Tuesday about a meeting at the White House that involved several Republican members of Congress ahead of the meeting of the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 presidential election.

Democratic Rep. Stephanie Murphy of Florida, a member of the committee, said the December 21 meeting was part of an effort to "disseminate his false claims and to encourage members of the public to fight the outcome on January 6."

Vice President Mike Pence, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff at the time, attended the meeting, along with President Donald Trump, Murphy said.

At the meeting, Murphy said the members discussed election theories pushed by Trump's personal lawyer John Eastman, who said he believed that Pence was able to single-handedly reject slates of electors in his role presiding over the joint session.

In reality, Pence's role was simply to count the votes. On Tuesday, the committee aired footage of Pat Cipollone, Trump's White House counsel. He was asked to address a comment attributed to him by another Trump advisor, Jason Miller, who quoted him as saying that Eastman's theory was "nutty." Cipollone declined to contradict that.

Cipollone said he tried to attend the meeting himself but was apparently turned away.

Here are the 11 House Republicans who were at the meeting, according to the White House visitor logs obtained by the January 6 panel:
  • Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama
  • Rep. Brian Babin of Texas
  • Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona
  • Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida
  • Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas
  • Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona
  • Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland
  • Rep. Jody Hice of Georgia
  • Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio
  • Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania
  • Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
every fucking one of them needs to be indicted, prosecuted VIGOROUSLY, and hung up to dry for as long as the law allows...let the rest of the republicunts know that EVERYONE but their brain dead base is on to their bullshit and we aren't going to fucking put up with it anymore... they plotted a coup with a traitorous president who wanted to install himself as dictator for life...they didn't do that out of loyalty, they have no loyalty. i want to know what trump offered each and every one of them to betray their country, their oath, and their honor? it was obviously enough, as they all agreed to help him commit treason.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member

Garland May Not Want To Indict A Former President — But He Might Not Have A Choice
7,404 views Jul 13, 2022 Former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal joins Morning Joe to discuss the evidence presented by the January 6 committee Tuesday, and how effective it was to "draw a link" between extremist groups and White House officials. "I don't think Merrick Garland has a choice," Katyal says. "I'm sure he doesn't want to do this, be the first Attorney General in the history of the United States to indict a former president, but the evidence is what the evidence is."
Biden needs to have a chat with Garland...let him know if major indictments don't start within the next two weeks, his services will no longer be needed. i'm sure there are MANY very competent people who would love a chance to prosecute trump and everyone involved with his coup attempt, it's time to get the fucking show on the road, or get the fuck out of the way and let someone with some balls do the job he can't do.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Biden needs to have a chat with Garland...let him know if major indictments don't start within the next two weeks, his services will no longer be needed. i'm sure there are MANY very competent people who would love a chance to prosecute trump and everyone involved with his coup attempt, it's time to get the fucking show on the road, or get the fuck out of the way and let someone with some balls do the job he can't do.
The J6 panel will have to issue an interim report before he indicts, but he should be making moves now to gather evidence and conduct searches and seize phones. You know they are engaged in large scale evidence destruction, but that's real heavy time too. As I said, it might not look pretty and might make your blood boil, but the closer shit happens to the election the better for the democrats. Garland might be delaying, but he is careful to stay inside the lanes and keep his hands clean, since he could be dealing with a republican congress and endless public hearings.

There is time for justice, but with Trump justice delayed is justice denied and he proved it all his criminal life. A cheeseburger stroke or Georgia could get him first, they have the most developed case. What we saw at the hearings was not evidence, prosecutors will turn it into evidence, because we have only seen the tip of the evidence iceberg, they will see it all. They will also have the legal tools to squeeze their nuts until their eyeballs pop out and create rats with squeal deals and when they make a deal, they have to fess up to everything they know.

Some of these people will be federally indicted before the election, but it's hard to go after the central players in the conspiracy without going after the kingpin who drove it all and for whose benefit it was all for.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
When Donald is convicted, what would his millions of fans say? FAKE NEWS! He's suppose to be in the White House, not the Big house! :lol: The TV interviews should surprise nobody who is familiar with these delusional assholes. The bigger problem will be with Foxnews, Tucker will be aghast and Hannity raging at the injustice heaped upon cheeto Jesus. Any future republican presidential hopeful, will be asked if they will pardon Trump, before the primary and after during the election. What could they say? They would avoid the question like the plague and will run from the cameras like Ron Johnson.

Speaking of, Ron, Ted, Gosh, Lindsay and other senators, have not been mentioned by the J6 panel. I guess Cheney's job for Mitch was to keep him informed and protect his senators, while screwing Trump and his wing of the party as hard as she can. Chuck Grassley had to be in on it too, he was the one going to step in to do Trump's bidding, when they drove Pence from the capitol, or hung him on the lawn.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
When Donald is convicted, what would his millions of fans say? FAKE NEWS! He's suppose to be in the White House, not the Big house! :lol: The TV interviews should surprise nobody who is familiar with these delusional assholes. The bigger problem will be with Foxnews, Tucker will be aghast and Hannity raging at the injustice heaped upon cheeto Jesus. Any future republican presidential hopeful, will be asked if they will pardon Trump, before the primary and after during the election. What could they say? They would avoid the question like the plague and will run from the cameras like Ron Johnson.

Speaking of, Ron, Ted, Gosh, Lindsay and other senators, have not been mentioned by the J6 panel. I guess Cheney's job for Mitch was to keep him informed and protect his senators, while screwing Trump and his wing of the party as hard as she can. Chuck Grassley had to be in on it too, he was the one going to step in to do Trump's bidding, when they drove Pence from the capitol, or hung him on the lawn.
"Salem Witch Trials All Over Again!"
 

MickFoster

Well-Known Member
Biden needs to have a chat with Garland...let him know if major indictments don't start within the next two weeks, his services will no longer be needed. i'm sure there are MANY very competent people who would love a chance to prosecute trump and everyone involved with his coup attempt, it's time to get the fucking show on the road, or get the fuck out of the way and let someone with some balls do the job he can't do.
Now you're acting like trump.
The executive branch is separate from the judicial branch.
 

shimbob

Well-Known Member
Now you're acting like trump.
The executive branch is separate from the judicial branch.
C'mon man
"The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), also known as the Justice Department, is a federal executive department of the United States government tasked with the enforcement of federal law and administration of justice in the United States. It is equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries. The department is headed by the U.S. Attorney General, who reports directly to the president of the United States and is a member of the president's Cabinet. The current attorney general is Merrick Garland, who was sworn in on March 11, 2021."
 

Kerowacked

Well-Known Member
What i got from yesterday’s coverage, every network switched to the hearing. Abc cbs nbc fox msnbc cnn, all want to eliminate Donald because he threatens the 1st Amendment with his Fake News vitriol. Commentators may support him but the networks want him gone, Fox included.
 

MickFoster

Well-Known Member
C'mon man
"The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), also known as the Justice Department, is a federal executive department of the United States government tasked with the enforcement of federal law and administration of justice in the United States. It is equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries. The department is headed by the U.S. Attorney General, who reports directly to the president of the United States and is a member of the president's Cabinet. The current attorney general is Merrick Garland, who was sworn in on March 11, 2021."
I stand corrected........the DOJ is part of the executive branch.
However the president can't pressure the AG and use the DOJ to do his personal bidding to go after his enemies.........that's what trump did.........and Nixon tried to do.
 
Top