Is a nuclear Iran bad for the world?
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
nope. no tushy trauma down this end, but then my butt is well hardened by long distance motorcycle rides and occasional horse ridin.
it takes more than a few numbskulls with no understanding of governance, philosophy, history or logic to chap my scaly backside.
i have ideals, and i live them, i can see how that must really put a burr under your saddle, but that dont befront me.
i got my own troubles to deal with, yours are of no concern to me.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the iranians have broken every deal they have ever made with the western world, dating all the way back to when they were called persia.
after the church commission in the 70's the CIA is more myth and legend than real power. if they had the kind of pure unadulterated badassery claimed by the conspiracy theorists, the soviets would have collapsed far sooner, abu sayyf would be demolished in an afternoon, and iran would be run by another tame Pahlavi Emperor on the Peacock Throne.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if you use the "reply with quote" button you can target your rebuttal to the appropriate remarks.
AFROBIN77
Active Member
just to help you not sound do ignorant when you speak muhammad is thier prophet and they follow the will of god (allah) ....
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
however, as mohammed is the last prophet, thus the statements he dictated for the koran, and the stories of the hadith are the FINAL WORD on "allah's will" the distinction between "allah" and his sole spokesman becomes irrelevant.
I am submitting my picture of Mohammed dressed in pure white linen in a North Dakota Blizzard.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Snowball!!!??? How did he find my cat?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
curiously that is NOT really the case.
mohammed had a price on his head, and toi protect himself from bounty hunters and assassins, he decreed that his image should not be drawn sculpted cast or painted, but before this "revelation" many images of MoMo had already been disseminated:
then they went for the Flame Head images:
and eventually the much later interpretation that all works of the creator are forbidden from being rendered as images so illustrations became stylized text which i find quite appealing:
echelon1k1
New Member
You gotta drop the McCarthy mentality... It's like you time travel here from 1960...
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
again criticism without substance.
the iranians HAVE violated every deal EVER with the west since Cyrus the Great kicked the bucket and his son came in and rescinded all of daddy's kinder and gentler edicts.
echelon1k1
New Member
sure bro... when was the last time Iran organised regime change in the US? I rest my case...
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if you dont count assassination squads targeting US policy makers and israeli diplomats?
further, where is the deal keeping in your specious non-sequitur?
breaking deals and treaties has EVERYTHING to do with the restoring of the last Pahlavi Shah, who was reinstalled because the "democratically elected" turd who replaced him broke every deal he had with the west.
try to stay on-subject.
echelon1k1
New Member
obviously not familiar with how regime change works, I don't have time to explain it to you - google it.
secondly, assassination squads have been the mainstay of western policy directives towards Iran, don't get dirty when they reply in kind. As for Israel, they false flag half of their shit, using proxy terrorist groups like the MEK to do their bidding in Iran, Pakistan & India.
Breaking treaties has nothing to do with the Shah. The US just can't help but stick its nose in on behalf of the Saudis, muddying the waters and sowing the seeds of anarchy and sectarian violence. Why you expect the rest of the world to bow to your non existent exceptionalism is beyond me, but you need to get out of your 1960's time warp and join the modern world.
I've stayed on subject and handed your ass to you, corrected your capricious assertions tainted by religious bias. congrats zealot.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the pahalvi shah was restored to power EXPLICITLY because the new regime was nationalizing the oil fields, dispossessing several powerful companies in direct violation of their contracts with the iranian government.
if the new regime had kept their deals till the contracts expired and then renegotiated, or had arranged compensation for the dispossessed companies when they nationalized, the shah would have remained in exile.
history is not your strong suit is it?
echelon1k1
New Member
Yeah fuck, wouldn't want a country to nationalise its own oil - threatening the stranglehold the US has over the petrodollar.
This is why I asked you if you've left the United States, your world view is pathetically biased and fearfully religious.
Similar threads
