FISA Abuse troll is a scam.

hanimmal said:

Can Trump be tried by a military court if he is impeached?

Click to expand...

He's a civilian and there is more than enough evidence to convict him of hundreds of crimes, once he is removed from office. The fact that he is POTUS is the only thing keeping him out of prison, the fact that Bill Barr is AG is the only thing keeping many more out of prison, including Bill himself. The election in 2020 might change that, but a close election will be stolen, it will need to be a big margin for the democrats to win, there are many desperate people on the republican side and they have Russian help and are willing to use it.

DIY-HP-LED said:

Just admit you were wrong and move on. Why are you carrying the water for these lying traitors? What is motivating all of this work and bullshit for Trump? Why do you believe bullshit and ignore facts? Answer these questions of yourself and seek the answers from within yourself. The MSM (including the international media) is not fake news Buggy, it's the real news (as in all the newspapers, even the partisan ones), you are only citing highly biased and partisan sources, who spout Russian disinformation. Even the news parts of Fox news are telling the truth, though they try to spin it, but can't. You're into serious reality denial & delusion Buggy, even Buck feels sorry for you!

Time to get the hakenkreuz tattoo removed from your forehead.

Did Russia interfere in the 2016 election, or do you believe the Russian lie that Trump, Nunes and the republicans are blathering about? There are facts and then there is bullshit, know the difference? Brown folks must frighten you to the point of insanity if you believe the bullshit that you're posting. Give up on Trump and "walk away" Buggy.

Click to expand...

One thing about people like @Bugeye et al, is that they will never admit that they got suckered. It would destroy their whole worldview and expose that they are an empty shell. They are riding this fat, orange bitch down to hell and even then their last utterance will be "but Hillary!"

Unclebaldrick said:

So are you going to ignore the findings that the FISA application was valid while you scream and tear out your hair because somebody did something wrong that had no effect whatsoever on the outcome? Lol, that is so weak - and yet fully expected from a person of your diminished caliber. And the fact that you can support Trump despite all the obvious corruption uncovered during the impeachment investigation makes this extra rich.

Will Bill Barr be putting out a statement that similarly ignores the conclusions while he sets his hair on fire about a fly found in the soup?

How does it feel to be exposed as a tiny, hypocritical goat?

Please keep posting about this, it exposes you as willing to ignore Trump's egregious violations of the Constitution while you cry about any little failing or misstep of those who rightfully oppose him. It's funny as hell.

What investigation will you be misguidedly hanging your hopes on next? Are you going back to waiting on the impending indictments stemming from Trump's Blue Ribbon Voter Fraud Commission? I mean, we have to get something out of the millions spent to make Donald feel better about losing the popular vote so badly, amiright?

Click to expand...

Note:

The words used in the report are "allegedly" or "may have"

not "did"

The nuances of propaganda are quite powerful.

Fogdog said:

Note:

The words used in the report are "allegedly" or "may have"

not "did"

The nuances of propaganda are quite powerful.

Click to expand...

So are the delusions of the unintelligent.

Fogdog said:

Note:

The words used in the report are "allegedly" or "may have"

not "did"

The nuances of propaganda are quite powerful.

Click to expand...

Also, it is amazing that Bill Buckley's magazine is being so misused. He would have hated Trump and he is probably rolling in his grave.

That's a shame.

Trump and his Russian allies must be pissed they are already having to spin Trump's latest IG report he is going to try to claim as a victory:

From @Bugeye's link:


I really enjoy the recent article: First lady Dissed by Wimpy Snowflakes.... lol Dear leader must love this website.

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/a20009.pdf


What do you think the chances are that they are inferring to Epstein?

So far this report looks like a attempt to say "Dealing with a Presidential election that you find out the candidate running may be working with Putin" is a up to this point unique event for the FBI to have to deal with, in a way trolls like Brad Parscale can cut and paste a few statements here and there to throw smoke to Dear Leader.

lmao, this report was cute, is this for real the one you have been hyping @Bugeye?

Because all it really had to say is in that above pic, between 2011 and 2019, therefore before and after Trump got elected. So any of the sources that they are saying are not being reviewed enough/properly could be due to Trump's incompetence.

I love the response from the FBI


Trump has nothing in this to give Putin to spin in the hope of getting him re-elected. He needs to suck it up, withdraw from Crimea, shut down their internet trolling programs.

And Claim:
And every other country can follow his lead. Eventually someone is going to push back and it will get ugly.

@Bugeye

Don’t end it all over this

Bugeye said:

Pathetic NYT spin on Horowitz report

The New York Times is operating in a pure propaganda mode, attempting to minimize the impact of the forthcoming (Dec. 9) report of the Department of Justice Inspector General, Michael Horowitz. Sundance, of The Conservative Treehouse, calls his...

www.americanthinker.com

Click to expand...

Will you be believing everything the Trump administration and water carriers are going to say about the report irrespective of the fact that it is not in the report or will you be calling for an investigation of the investigation's investigators?

I know you won't answer so I will just listen to Hannity in order to get your answer.

Bugeye said:

Barr disputes key inspector general finding about FBI’s Russia investigation

Click to expand...

Damn, Buggey, you are funny... in a sad way.

Even more disappointed then when he found out the whore's kid was slow.

Bill Barr sucks russian dog dicks

Washington Post: Barr's handpicked prosecutor tells watchdog he doesn't have evidence Russia probe was a setup
Washington Post: Barr's handpicked prosecutor tells watchdog he doesn't have evidence Russia probe was a setup

Washington (CNN)The prosecutor chosen by Attorney General William Barr to examine how US agencies investigated President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign has said he cannot provide evidence to the Justice Department's inspector general in support of a theory that the case was a setup, people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz contacted multiple US intelligence agencies and Connecticut federal prosecutor John Durham -- who Barr appointed to lead a separate review of the 2016 investigation into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia -- to ask whether a Maltese professor who communicated with a Trump campaign staffer was actually a US intelligence asset attempting to trap the campaign, the people told The Post.
The intelligence agencies said the professor was not their asset and Durham told Horowitz he didn't have evidence that would refute the inspector general's findings on that point, the people said.
Horowitz's report, which is due to be released next Monday, is expected to conclude that the FBI's investigation was legally predicated, despite errors and potential wrongdoing by some lower-level FBI employees involved in it, CNN reported last month.
The report is also expected to conclude that Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, was appropriately targeted for surveillance and the FBI appropriately disassociated itself from Christopher Steele, a former British spy who's the author of the infamous dossier about President Donald Trump, after leaks and contacts with the media were uncovered.
But despite this, Barr -- a longtime skeptic of the Russia probe, and particularly the FBI's tactics to investigate Trump campaign associates -- has told conservative allies Horowitz's report won't be the last word on the matter.
Instead, the attorney general has told allies to wait for Durham's investigation, which he believes will be more complete.
Durham is a Trump appointee who has investigated numerous public corruption cases under Republican and Democratic administrations.
He was appointed by then-Attorney General Janet Reno to investigate corruption surrounding the use of FBI informants in Boston in the late 1990s, and later called on to investigate the CIA's destruction of videotapes of detainee interrogations in 2008.

John Solomon was the go between for Rudy, Nunes and Parnas. Weird connection to the Ukraine shakedown. Most definitely his narrative is biased towards Trump.

@Bugeye, it is interesting to me what you do to come across all of these specific scams?


"Let me tell you what is revealed in a report not out yet, so you don't need to worry about popping that bubble":

Cult logic.

I am actually looking forward to reading the stupid report now though, so I do have to thank @Bugeye for that.

Nancy just punted the ball to the Senate. Assuming Trump getting his historical footnote asterisk for all time, it will be interesting to see how fast the Republicans fall apart on this.

John Solomon lol

It must chap dittoheads like @Bugeye that even Republican propaganda media outlets aren't pimping this lie as truth any more.

Not that it hasn't already entered into the pantheon of fake conspiracies they trot periodically. We'll see this brought up in "yeah but what about" arguments for the next century our so.

I still remember when buggy used to pretend he wasn’t a nazi