Erpsssarwtc

[UncleBuck]

Every
Ron
Paul
Supporter
Should
Support
A
Woman's
Right
To
Choose

a woman owns her body in a more important way then a business owner owns their business.

at any time and without warning during a pregnancy, her life can be at risk due to unexpected complications.

paulistas have no problem accepting that states have the right to tell a woman what she may or may not do with her own body during the most vulnerable and difficult of times.

do you really want to be like santorum and allow certain states to make sure that rape babies (gifts) are mandated to be carried to term by a citizen who owns her own body? not every state would go by ronald's moral standard, which is prudish at best.

and shouldn't we be encouraging "a stitch in time saves nine" philosophy? shouldn't we be subsidizing birth control to help prevent unplanned pregnancies and abortions? i mean, the pills are not a problem with respect to abortion, they reduce the number of abortions. i think we can all say that we want to reduce the number of abortions, no matter which side of the aisle you fall on.

the immorality of women not wanting to be impregnated, much less, forced by the state government to carry to term a rape baby or one that somehow got by the problematic birth control pill is worthy of addressing in front of millions of viewers on live TV. ronald and santorum both made sure to do so when given the chance, even after the crowd booed the very question as if it were not worthy.

end point: if you believe a business has the right to do basically whatever it wants, you should really believe that a woman (and you for that matter) have a right to do what you please with your own bodies without any government interference whatsoever.

 

[deprave]

Why do you think that Ron Paul Supporters don't support a women's right to choose? I am a Ron Paul supporter and I do...being a "Ron Paul Supporter" doesn't mean you nessecarily agree with everything he says or believes morally...you could be a gay pro-choice female black jew muslim socialist and still support Dr Paul because his philosophy supports you. I would say that most Ron Paul supporters are likely to be "pro-choice" or at least half because of his stance on social issues.

Regardless, Ron Paul doesn't believe in policing/legistaling morality, and he doesn't believe you can police abortion, he just simply doesn't think it should be FUNDED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNEMENT either FOR/AGAINST....This is rooted in the libertarian non-agression principle because it is the STATE commiting act of violence toward people. You just don't seem to understand that. Dr Paul Prescribes morning after and birth control pills, hes an OB, he doesn't believe in a consitutional amendment regarding abortion, and finally his "Pro-life" voting record in the eyes of evangelicals is incredibly poor (under 50%)...some democrats are rated better...

 

[Smirgen]

Hmm let me try this.

Eosssaacrtbcatbhosiabtcicoii


Every
Obama
supporter
should
support
an
American
citizens
right
to
be
charged
and
tried
before
he
or
she
is
assasainated
by
the
commander
in
chief
or
Imprisioned
indefinitely.

 

[desert dude]

Every
Ron
Paul
Supporter
Should
Support
A
Woman's
Right
To
Choose

a woman owns her body in a more important way then a business owner owns their business.

at any time and without warning during a pregnancy, her life can be at risk due to unexpected complications.

paulistas have no problem accepting that states have the right to tell a woman what she may or may not do with her own body during the most vulnerable and difficult of times.

do you really want to be like santorum and allow certain states to make sure that rape babies (gifts) are mandated to be carried to term by a citizen who owns her own body? not every state would go by ronald's moral standard, which is prudish at best.

and shouldn't we be encouraging "a stitch in time saves nine" philosophy? shouldn't we be subsidizing birth control to help prevent unplanned pregnancies and abortions? i mean, the pills are not a problem with respect to abortion, they reduce the number of abortions. i think we can all say that we want to reduce the number of abortions, no matter which side of the aisle you fall on.

the immorality of women not wanting to be impregnated, much less, forced by the state government to carry to term a rape baby or one that somehow got by the problematic birth control pill is worthy of addressing in front of millions of viewers on live TV. ronald and santorum both made sure to do so when given the chance, even after the crowd booed the very question as if it were not worthy.

end point: if you believe a business has the right to do basically whatever it wants, you should really believe that a woman (and you for that matter) have a right to do what you please with your own bodies without any government interference whatsoever.

Yawn.... Strawman.

 

[BA142]

You remind me of the Christian's that "hate" gay people but they spend more time talking about gays than the gay people themselves...

You hate Ron Paul, he's shit in your mind. He has no chance. Why do you devote so many of your posts to him? You have a secret crush?





Gary Johnson 2012

 

[ThatGuy113]

You remind me of the Christian's that "hate" gay people but they spend more time talking about gays than the gay people themselves...

You hate Ron Paul, he's shit in your mind. He has no chance. Why do you devote so many of your posts to him? You have a secret crush?





Gary Johnson 2012

I think the issue here is they have been talking about this shit for years now. Its old.



More people should be like good guy Greg here. Why dont you go count the amount of Ron Paul threads started by our libertarian leaning community here. It never ends. I mean with the exception of Uncle Bucks Ron Paul losing thread there are at least 7 Ron Paul threads in the first 3 pages on top of all of the anti-Obama conspiracy threads too (Most posting in those are also Ron Paul supporters).


edit-
I can only speak for myself but thats whats grinds my gears about it. Its a constant shit storm of a misled Ron Paul supporter version of American exceptionalism.






Here's 16 pages of Ron Paul threads. ENJOY!

https://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429530&pp=


I bet if you searched Obama in our search engine youd see 90% threads are bashing him, also made by non Obama supporters who have a tendency to make Ron Paul threads.

https://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429540 Go ahead click it You wont see very many supportive Obama threads.

Maybe were on to a pattern here

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Here's some Bucky porn. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX7goxsip6Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player

 

[Mr Neutron]

I think the issue here is they have been talking about this shit for years now. Its old.

View attachment 2156247

More people should be like good guy Greg here. Why dont you go count the amount of Ron Paul threads started by our libertarian leaning community here. It never ends. I mean with the exception of Uncle Bucks Ron Paul losing thread there are at least 7 Ron Paul threads in the first 3 pages on top of all of the anti-Obama conspiracy threads too (Most posting in those are also Ron Paul supporters).


edit-
I can only speak for myself but thats whats grinds my gears about it. Its a constant shit storm of a misled Ron Paul supporter version of American exceptionalism.


View attachment 2156259



Here's 16 pages of Ron Paul threads. ENJOY!

https://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429530&pp=


I bet if you searched Obama in our search engine youd see 90% threads are bashing him, also made by non Obama supporters who have a tendency to make Ron Paul threads.

https://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429540 Go ahead click it You wont see very many supportive Obama threads.

Maybe were on to a pattern here

With those kind of numbers, maybe it's not the Ron Paul supporters who are mislead!!!???

 

[deprave]

The only reason ron paul threads become so long is because the people who love to hate him really, they would just die off immedietly without any discussion if there wasn't like the 4 people on here who passionately hate him and troll the threads, aside from that Ron Paul threads are created because of current events, when there is nothing new with Ron Paul then there isn't Ron Paul threads, the threads only stay on the front page because they are actively trolled, its not so much the supporters that are "beating a dead horse" but the haters, the haters are also the ones who repeat the exact same shit over and over. How many times are you going to post that picture of "Greg" and tell people to shut the fuck up? Really? You STFU

This is illustrated by looking at the Ron Paul threads that don't have haters posting in them, they get a few responses and immedietly die off, there is a few of them like that, they must of took place while unclebuck was on vacation.

 

[Mr Neutron]

the only reason ron paul threads become so long is because the people who love to hate him really, they would just die off immedietly without any discussion if there wasn't like the 4 people on here who passionately hate him and troll the threads, aside from that ron paul threads are created because of current events, when there is nothing new with ron paul then there isn't ron paul threads, the threads only stay on the front page because they are actively trolled, its not so much the supporters that are "beating a dead horse" but the haters, the haters are also the ones who repeat the exact same shit over and over. How many times are you going to post that picture of "greg" and tell people to shut the fuck up? Really? You stfu

this is illustrated by looking at the ron paul threads that don't have haters posting in them, they get a few responses and immediently die off, there is a few of them like that, they must of took place while unclebuck was on vacation.

+++like+++

 

[UncleBuck]

I would say that most Ron Paul supporters are likely to be "pro-choice" or at least half because of his stance on social issues.

not good enough, every last person who believes in ronald's core message of liberty and freedom should support a woman's right to choose and should be dead set against the state government (or any level of government) trying to take away a woman's right to own her own body.

 

[deprave]

your right that would only make sense but its not really relevant to the message, you can support Ron Paul's core message if you are pro-life or pro-choice because Ron Paul doesn't believe in legistlating or policing morals so its beside the point really.

 

[UncleBuck]

...Ron Paul doesn't believe in legistlating or policing morals so its beside the point really.

wtf are you talking about?

ronald absolutely believes in legislating morality, he tries to do so himself with those unacceptable homosexuals and would not object to states owning a woman's body more than the woman herself owns her body.

quit lying to me and the rest of us and treat us like we are actually intelligent.drop your lies, agenda, and propaganda.

 

[Mr Neutron]

not good enough, every last person who believes in ronald's core message of liberty and freedom should support a woman's right to choose and should be dead set against the state government (or any level of government) trying to take away a woman's right to own her own body.

If you're talking about abortion, all I want to know is, what about the life being aborted? Does the baby have no rights because it is incapable of the intellect and mechanics of thought and communication?

 

[Mr Neutron]

ronald absolutely believes in legislating morality, he tries to do so himself with those unacceptable homosexuals and would not object to states owning a woman's body more than the woman herself owns her body.

Why are you lying, quit lying, lies, lies, lies.

 

[UncleBuck]

If you're talking about abortion, all I want to know is, what about the life being aborted? Does the baby have no rights because it is incapable of the intellect and mechanics of thought and communication?

the woman owns her body, not you. that's her decision to make, not yours or anyone else's.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why are you lying, quit lying, lies, lies, lies.

H.R.7955
Latest Title: Family Protection Act
Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-22] (introduced 8/19/1980)

Prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds to any organization which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style.​

 

[lifegoesonbrah]

H.R.7955
Latest Title: Family Protection Act
Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-22] (introduced 8/19/1980)

Prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds to any organization which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style.​

He should ammend his bill that never passed from 1980 to deny Federal funding for heterosexual promoting corporations and non-profits.

The desperation of an anti-Paul smells when they post the same thing in every thread.

 

[Mr Neutron]

the woman owns her body, not you. that's her decision to make, not yours or anyone else's.

That's it, avoid the question.
In the government's view, no, nobody owns their own body. You, me, women, anybody. Hence drug and prostitution laws.
What about the baby's rights? Who speaks for them?

 

[spandy]

Life begins at conception, so regardless if its a rape baby or slipped passed the pill, doesn't excuse killing an unborn child because it is alive inside the woman no matter how it got there. Birth control should be accessable to all women,fuck I'd pay into a system that helped provide it because birth control is cheaper than feeding a born child, but once you are pregnant its your burden no matter how it got there. Shit happens, deal with it and make the best of the situation. My nephew is a rape child, I couldn't imagine what our lives would be like if my sister was one of those people who choose to save their own ass by killing an unborn child.


Ron Paul 2012