CatHedral
Well-Known Member
Consider strategy. Did the WSJ endorse the letter, or put it out there to put paid to plausible denial? I’m not certain.https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/28/politics/donald-trump-wall-street-journal-letter/index.html
that ^ doesn't seem to support your hypothesis...at least one main stream media giant will give him a voice, even if they don't support him officially...
![www.google.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmediabiasfactcheck.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F09%2F70982153_683576715489993_3036728782363820032_n-e1608491429724.jpg&hash=2d8f212eb4ab89e99149f44b571ca6b0&return_error=1)
Wall Street Journal - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
![www.google.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fmediabiasfactcheck.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F12%2Fcropped-transparent-MBFC-Square512.png%3Ffit%3D32%252C32%26ssl%3D1&hash=5dea78afcfabf733ac3d5ca68c748a65&return_error=1)
Also the WSJ scores fairly far right and gets the third class for veracity. So I’m willing to treat this as a minority report.