Canadian plant restrictions coming.

DigitalTorture

Well-Known Member
This topic is a JOKE. Get a pair of BALLS or Med Script if you dont want to "get in trouble or court or whatever"...
I think most people do have balls about growing. Not everyone just jumped on the bandwagon in the past couple years. I've been involved with cannabis longer than you would guess. Some of us just would rather not fake an illness or even have that mentality to begin with?

And why don't people seem to know that there IS NO MORE HEIGHT RESTRICTION?! It's gone from the legislation. They took it out.
 

Lightgreen2k

Well-Known Member
I think most people do have balls about growing. Not everyone just jumped on the bandwagon in the past couple years. I've been involved with cannabis longer than you would guess. Some of us just would rather not fake an illness or even have that mentality to begin with?

And why don't people seem to know that there IS NO MORE HEIGHT RESTRICTION?! It's gone from the legislation. They took it out.
NOBODY said anything about faking any illness.

Categories

Backpain and (not chronic) can be treated for cannabis or appetite. Many everday things that the government has issued.

So these plant restrictions mean NOTHING.
 

DigitalTorture

Well-Known Member
NOBODY said anything about faking any illness.

Categories

Backpain and (not chronic) can be treated for cannabis or appetite. Many everday things that the government has issued.

So these plant restrictions mean NOTHING.
They mean NOTHING because they don't exist. Don't you understand, or are you too stoned?
 

Lightgreen2k

Well-Known Member
They mean NOTHING because they don't exist. Don't you understand, or are you too stoned?
Oh I understand not stoned at all.

The person that made this post and i quote

"Canada, 4 plant count with 100cm height restriction. What are everyone's thoughts on this? With the new legislation being introduced sometime during next week, we will know for sure, but I personally think we will be allowed 6."

Do they understand? Or why even ask. Whoopsi....
 

DigitalTorture

Well-Known Member
Oh I understand not stoned at all.

The person that made this post and i quote

"Canada, 4 plant count with 100cm height restriction. What are everyone's thoughts on this? With the new legislation being introduced sometime during next week, we will know for sure, but I personally think we will be allowed 6."

Do they understand? Or why even ask. Whoopsi....
That would be me, and it seems that you are getting worked up for nothing. Have a good day sir/mam.
 

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Salutations DigitalTorture,
Salutations Everybody,

The thread is worth attention enough for me to have prepared a concatenated reply (...), hoping this will fit in better than the previous provocation(s)...

:rolleyes:

Canada, 4 plant count... ...I personally think we will be allowed 6.
Québec = 2 LPs (over 67 so far!!) + ZERO plant:

La Presse - Cannabis: Québec dit non à la production privée (2017-Sep-14)

« Québec ne permettra pas aux citoyens de faire pousser eux-mêmes leurs plants de pot, même si cette autoproduction est autorisée par le projet de loi fédéral déposé en avril dernier. »​

Translation: NO.

It's from the same socio-toxic minister who managed to find her "inspiration" at the COP6/FCTC 2014 event which occured behind closed doors in Russia, equating tobacco, e-Cigs and VAPORIZERS!


Briefly put that's an individual with great power and even more responsability, yet with zero objectivity/credibility as she felt useful to tell her own personal stories on TV, 1st about cancer killing her dad then about her own struggling with SMOKING...

What are you worried about?
If i can be excused to skip huge preliminaries i'll just say V I L I F I C A T I O N then "saving" the lost (satistically-ellusive) children of planet Itnoc...


...come on people use your brains. It is not that serious.
When a man on the land of cap'tain Itnoc is KILLED by POLICE over 8 oz not even his own there's no other option for me than to reply it's DEAD serious, on the contrary.

Ref.: #1) Jean-Pierre Bony now renamed Bony Jean-Pierre by a single-sourced mass-media press. #2) Christian Gilbert, the SPVM-GTi agent with plenty of alternative weapon training (since 2008 or so...) who still managed to deadly injure a sitting-duck target with his "plastic wand" projectile... Actually this was serious enough to send him in a criminal court of justice (where only his lawyer showed up), simply to be cleared in the end as there's been zero echo since last fall when he was supposed to undergo trial in front of a juge, i figured.

The purpose of this thread was to get feedback and start a discussion on how people feel about the new law... ... I prefer to say "i smoke cannabis because i like it!".
Although i got no acquaintances in the carceral universe i always felt Justin Trudeau must NOT be trusted simply because of quite some the long chain of paradoxal events, since Joy Davies for example, which constistently consolidated this attitude (and still does today).

To me it's not the best strategy though, allowing our enemy to remain in control of the spotlights continuously, while bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionists take over our public institutions to impose their socio-toxic values. Those who got their "medical" rights protected by our constitution are still being challenged and yet those monsters are not and now the war is about to turn ugly when it comes to "stoner$"/"droÿé$", not to mention the distortions in an artificially inflated "legal" market.

In other words i'd prefer to say « what makes them so "holier than us" that gives them the right to invade our lives, threaten our families including those very same children they pretend to "save", blaming us for trauma leading to permanent prejudice, etc. »...

Then i'd force them and their clueless supporters to watch documentaries as "Fix-my-Kid" and "Kids-for-Cash", for starters:



Which is what Justin MiniHarper is trying to import to a country of Canuck citizens right now IMHO! >:(

Hence it's quite about time we finally question obvious/blatant TrudeauMania on propagandist TV, including CBC/SRC.

...there needs to be more thought put into the growing aspect...
All right, how about putting the "stoner$"/"droÿé$" needs 1st, although Justin Trudeau clearly expressed himself, last year (...), saying in Toronto that he's NOT doing it to « "PLEASE" recreational users » exactly?!


Which to me pretty much closes any dialog on the urgent need to support adapted genetic selection, for example. Suitable consumption methods & ritual(s) being right next in my list of priorities.

The least i can argue is that the law due for revision by the senate is NOT on my side and probably not yours neither unless you're one of those "medical" hostages who supported an artificial good vs evil discrimination system with their legal signature, just to fulfill their own pressing needs in priority, when proper de-scheduling could have served the masses including themselves!...

How about LPs discussing behind closed doors about using BANNED pesticides to produce mari-caca for those same "medical" client$? Or Québec's Hydropothecary working hard to define the detection threshold level of myclobutanil (below 0.01 PPM), even dispatching it for everyone to consider including "organized crime"... Now lets consider for a minute the frightening possibility of emerging synergies knowing there were 200+ pesticides on the Washington list, as i vaguely recall!...

:o


{ This message continues next... }
 
Last edited:

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
{ My previous message continues here. }


I'm going to have to read the whole thing in detail.
CDSA rings a bell anyone??


I am under the impression that we should be stocking up on seeds.
Your sense of auto-preservation ain't failing there! :leaf:

Don't sign and you will be considered "illicit CANNABIS"
With government being the only provider it makes it easy enough to use GMOs with a couple bio-markers: none means prison, #1 is for "medical", #2 for "stoner$"/"droÿé$"... Or just use traçable pesticide soups instead!
:fire:

I was always skepticle of giving any info about what I did and never applied, thank god I didn't.
Electrical "smart" meters might very well "auto-apply" on behalf of growers, once the bigot army feels ready; picking their prizes 1-by-1, e.g. isolated individuals facing the state.

...once an outlaw, always an outlaw.
Which is perfectly TRUE with a calculating liar/manipulator as Justin Trudeau!!

:roll:

Who the hell cares about the politics of it all?
Read above: it's ALL been about POLITICAL head games, in blaunt denial of our democratic rights/institutions and beyond...

As far as I know, Ontario is not going to allow home grows at all. Also, it wouldn't be enforceable anyways...
Québec's sinister of health (and healthy ways!) may have preceeded Ontario on this one!

Never forget that Trudeau exploited the language barrier to fuel and maintain confusion over the "incidental possession" which the Liberals forgot to properly translate as "possession simple": IMO they just did it on purpose... As a matter of fact confusion compounded with division has been with us all over the place, English federalist Canada against nationalist French Québec, the worthy "medical" against "criminals", LPs against dispensaries, "science" against bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionism resulting in more criminalization enforced by POLICE when it should be handled like a Public Health issue, and so on and on and on...

To make it short: DIVIDE TO CONQUER. :sleep:

All financed by public money, e.g. at a height of about half a billion dollars, so far...

By chance we're not all sleeping when key events occur that can fuel an independent press, for example:


[ poll.forumresearch.com/post/2782/federal-horserace-september-2017/ ]
TFP: Fall Blues for Trudeau (2017-Sep-24)

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
 
Last edited:

DigitalTorture

Well-Known Member
"In other words i'd prefer to say « what makes them so "holier than us" that gives them the right to invade our lives, threaten our families including those very same children they pretend to "save", blaming us for traumaleading to permanent prejudice, etc. »..."

No kidding, this whole save the children argument is just stupid. Why can't they just say......

"hey, we realized that cannabis is in fact pretty harmless and you should be able too consume, possess and cultivate it without fear of retribution. We were wrong about this whole thing and we are sorry."
 

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Hi again DigitalTorture,

In other words i'd prefer to say « what makes them so "holier than us" that gives them the right to invade our lives, threaten our families including those very same children they pretend to "save", blaming us for trauma leading to permanent prejudice, etc.
No kidding, this whole save the children argument is just stupid. Why can't they just say...
No kidding, i consider myself as a former lost teenager of planet Itnoc.

The fact is, if we can accept the obvious reality below, e.g. unlike Trudeau who prefers to re-focus "debates" on Nixon's "fault", only to serve his own centric electoralist hidden agenda, euh... M'well then i must stress that "Indian Hemp"/"Chanvre Indien"/"Cannabis sativa L." were 1st effectively demonized internationally at the Geneva Opium Convention of 1925, officially starting in February 19 to be exact:

[ www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19250006/index.html ]
(Sorry, this is the French version from Switzerland...)

Convention internationale relative aux stupéfiants
Conclue à Genève le 19 février 1925
Approuvée par l'Assemblée fédérale le 14 juin 1928
Ratification déposée par la Suisse le 3 avril 1929
Entrée en vigueur pour la Suisse le 2 juillet 1929
Now please everyone, pay some serious attention to the amount of "hits" searching for these most relevant key-words, under the circumstances:

1 Hit - "Canada"
9 Hits - "Chanvre Indien"
1 Hit - "Cannabis" (sativa L.)
1 Hit - "Hachich"
ZERO HIT - "Enfant" (e.g. child in English!)...


Raoul Dandurand had been rewarded for his contributions to the League of Nations with a president chair that very same year, not long after the infamous book of Emily F. Murphy aka Janey Canuck was sent by boat to be added to their library as "reference", according to rumours!...


Which means their "science" was that of zealots as "doctor" John Warnock, a guy who never cared to talk to his patients without a translator standing by (!), in his Cairo/Egypt asylum for hashich insane "addicts"...

Still worse, this fine Liberal diplomat happened to be married to Joséphine Marchand, another pro-feminist activist who once also printed her own papers, literally: "Le coin du feu"! So... Who's gullible enough not to suspect that in their little hermetic "elite" universe such politically driven individuals didn't know each other!...


Then i must ask: who's really this gullible today, enough not to conclude that Trudeau chose his LIBERAL LEGACY over the future of Canadian voters who put him in Ottawa nonetheless, including the parents of vulnerable children who are about to be infected by more socio-toxic propaganda, direct from national TV, even on premium hours!

M'well, i mean go figure... :wall:

...we realized that cannabis is in fact pretty harmless and you should be able too consume, possess and cultivate it without fear of retribution. We were wrong about this whole thing and we are sorry.
Justin Trudeau has great powers and even more responsability, as the calculator mind that he is i just can't believe he never heard about POLICE actually KILLING the competition - unarmed and framed by the 4 solid sides of a brick wall, much like a sitting duck on flat water... Ah, and not too long after the nomination of Bill G20 Blair, to top it all!
Euh... Please tell me, didn't i make sense at all expressing such outrage? :cuss:

Hoping i found suitable words that will reach its target within our very fragmented "community"! :weed:

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
 
Last edited:
Top