cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I cannot be bothered to do your research for you. Also, there exists an ordering of quality of the information Google can find. Google isn't fussy. So how do you suggest I vet the info you should have provided for verity?Hmmmm, you can't be bothered to use Google to see about my assertions, why should I be bothered to do it about yours?
Thin skin covering thinner argument.
When I bring a quantitative argument, I have the grace to recognize that it is my job to bring the supporting data ... at least a web reference or two. What I have done by adding the reference (if quantitative, a reference that explains what the numbers are and where they came from) is make my argument specific and thus vulnerable - falsifiable. This admits that others could legitimately undo my argument, if they have other necessary facts to hand.
Your ignoring the question where I asked you to present even one untruth Annie posted ... is ugly. You imply that she is lying and that your defining the lie is beneath your contempt. I like you rather less now ... for that bit of character assassination and not for your arguing with me. Perhaps I am simply not German enough.