Who will be better at getting America out of debt, Trump or Hillary?

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Teh Fux? refi for what, to lower the interest? That would hurt you more according to you.

Here's a crazy idea. Pay the above loan off. Pay the taxes. Then put what you would have been paying in interest to charity or a good cause rather than just giving it to the bank.

Last one I swear. I love your vert grows but you fucked this up.
Click to expand...
once you get out of the single wide trailer you dwell in, we can have a discussion about the wisdom of investing in real estate versus a trailer and copper pennies.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
I do not know what the term 'Basic Survival' means. There is a vast amount of difference in cost of living from place to place and many options for people to save money including sharing housing, transportation, food, etc. Not sure what percentage of the population is barely surviving.
Click to expand...
Many of those options aren't available to many people

NLXSK1 said:
I dont think that individuals should be treated differently based on their income.
Click to expand...
NLXSK1 said:
I am against a regressive taxation system that takes more from people as they make more money.
Click to expand...
Obviously you do support taxing people who spend a larger percentage of their income more than those who don't, so you do support treating people differently based on their income
NLXSK1 said:
It restricts freedom.
Click to expand...
How?
NLXSK1 said:
I dont think we should be taxed upon our income because it is an incredible invasion of privacy that declares we are guilty of making money and requires us to prove our expenses so we do not have to pay excess taxes.
Click to expand...
Would you have a problem with me using your house as a candy shop?
NLXSK1 said:
Can you tell me why you seem to have no problem with the limitless spending of the government and the intrusiveness in our lives?
Click to expand...
No, I can't, because you are mistaken like usual
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
once you get out of the single wide trailer you dwell in, we can have a discussion about the wisdom of investing in real estate versus a trailer and copper pennies.
*This message sponsored and paid for by the DNC*
Click to expand...
Fixed for transparency. When you live in a bulletproof house on more than >.5 acres you'll re ready.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Many of those options aren't available to many people


Obviously you do support taxing people who spend a larger percentage of their income more than those who don't, so you do support treating people differently based on their income

How?

Would you have a problem with me using your house as a candy shop?

No, I can't, because you are mistaken like usual
Click to expand...

Here is the problem Padwan.

When I say that everyone should be taxed 20% on their spending you accuse me of treating people differently.


I do not even know how to address that.....

You say that treating people differently means you are treating people the same.

I am saying that government uses envy to grab more money from some people simply because they can.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Here is the problem Padwan.

When I say that everyone should be taxed 20% on their spending you accuse me of treating people differently.


I do not even know how to address that.....

You say that treating people differently means you are treating people the same.

I am saying that government uses envy to grab more money from some people simply because they can.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is time the poor pay their fair share! I have always felt that they should be taxed on their toilet paper, milk, shitty cars, light bulbs, food, back to school supplies, medicine, shoes, rat traps, books, chap stick, pots n pans, etc.

It is insane to tax rich people on income. Tax them on what they spend so they can move the rest into job creating things like offshore accounts!

Fuck yeah, brother! You da best. This is surely the way to make sure the poor pay at least 20% of their salary and the rich less than a fraction of a percent. Fuck the poor, they are not paying their fair share!
 
T

That_guy

Active Member
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
That_guy said:
THE WEALTHY PAY THE MAJORITY OF INCOME TAX IN THIS COUNTRY.

http://www.cnbc.com/2013/12/11/the-rich-do-not-pay-the-most-taxes-they-pay-all-the-taxes.html

And that was in 2013. Do tell, what source you base your opinion. I can give you multiple sources for mine, but I'll start with CNBC. I get the feeling you aren't too bright in the area of income tax
Click to expand...
Such fail:dunce:

The article is about WAGE earning individuals.

The bulk income of top 1% is through Capital Gains..they are NOT W-2s.

I get the feeling you are a sock of someone who is on my ignore.
 
freemanjack

freemanjack

Well-Known Member
Simple answer, neither of them, as far as I am aware of both presidential candidates politics do not include the immediate closure of the fed and institution of sovereign money created by the state (as JFK suggested just before his driver blew his brains out ). The only thing 'federal' or 'reserved' about the federal reserve is the name, it is a private company run for profit, google Jekyll Island. The best fiscal escape we have from the banks fuckary's is sovereign money 'based on' (not backed by metal reserves) the price of silver, the reasoning being, 95% of the earths silver deposits are still 'in the ground' and a man with a shovel can dig most any dirt in the right regions and return roughly an ounce a day, this has historically pegged the value of silver at approximately the cost of a days manual labour for one man, but no actual bulky reserves need to be held as the value of the currency would be naturally determined by the gdp of the country and the industriousness of its population.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Here is the problem Padwan.

When I say that everyone should be taxed 20% on their spending you accuse me of treating people differently.


I do not even know how to address that.....

You say that treating people differently means you are treating people the same.

I am saying that government uses envy to grab more money from some people simply because they can.
Click to expand...
If everyone is taxed 20% on their spending, and I spend more of my income than you do, I am taxed more than you are

This is not a difficult concept to understand
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If everyone is taxed 20% on their spending, and I spend more of my income than you do, I am taxed more than you are

This is not a difficult concept to understand
Click to expand...
Incorrect...\

If you make $30,000 dollars per year and spend all of it you would pay $6,000 in taxes.

If I make a million dollars and spend $200,000 of it then I pay $40,000 in taxes.

Explain how you have spent more of our income than I have....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top