Who will be better at getting America out of debt, Trump or Hillary?

twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Lol how the fuck would you know? Your only study of history is what you eagerly swallow while on your knees in front of Faux Spews.

You got some HIS story on your chin... better lick that up.
Click to expand...
Pretty clever, is this the crescendo leading up to your usual bullshit reading list of David Cay Johnston and the like?

Reuters on DCJ said:
This is what happens what you have a dedicated ideologue reporting on technical topics. This is a case of serious and gross incompetence and stupidity by David Cay Johnston and the responsible editors. There should be terminations– truly an embarrassment.
Click to expand...
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Pretty clever, is this the crescendo leading up to your usual bullshit reading list of David Cay Johnston and the like?
Click to expand...
Ah, yes- the sad pathetic attempt at an intellectual preemptive strike.

If you think lower taxes on the rich and mega corps is the way forward, then you haven't been paying attention for 40 years.

Just keep sucking that right wing cock and see what it gets you. You aren't rich, you're just a bitch, nevermind sucker for those who are.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Ah, yes- the sad pathetic attempt at an intellectual preemptive strike.

If you think lower taxes on the rich and mega corps is the way forward, then you haven't been paying attention for 40 years.

Just keep sucking that right wing cock and see what it gets you. You aren't rich, you're just a bitch, nevermind sucker for those who are.
Click to expand...
OK, throwing insults to avoid an actual discussion. Well that's a new one on RIU politics you should get a trophy. Here ya go slugger......
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Do you have an actual position with defined parameters or will it be the usual douchebaggery today? I can tell you I am not a fan of rich or megacorps per say. Why don't you try and take little bites that you can actually digest, defining "rich" would be an excellent starting point.
 
.Pinworm.

.Pinworm.

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Do you have an actual position with defined parameters or will it be the usual douchebaggery today? I can tell you I am not a fan of rich or megacorps per say. Why don't you try and take little bites that you can actually digest, defining "rich" would be an excellent starting point.
Click to expand...
I would say rich would be something like a couple million or so. You can sit on that and earn a few thousand on it every month just from having it in the bank (if you are smart enough not to waste it on shit like a fast car, or a super expensive drum kit or whatever) I consider "wealthy" to be in the upper hundred millions or billions. Idk, though. What would you define it as?
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
.Pinworm. said:
I would say rich would be something like a couple million or so. You can sit on that and earn a few thousand on it every month just from having it in the bank (if you are smart enough not to waste it on shit like a fast car, or a super expensive drum kit or whatever) I consider "wealthy" to be in the upper hundred millions or billions. Idk, though. What would you define it as?
Click to expand...
I buy that. I support income taxing of the rich/wealthy as well, it seems the rich/wealthy by and large are mostly the ones with a propensity to generate income.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
.Pinworm. said:
For sure. Def not a brag.
Click to expand...
Embarrassing as it may be, carrying the loss forward on his taxes might just be the most intelligent and respectable thing he's ever done, lol

...after losing a billion dollars on a casino in Atlantic City, FFS? I mean, HOW does one even do that? It's like dying of starvation while swimming in a pool of Ensure!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top