Legal to grow and possess illegal to sell

[Rob Roy]

Actually sir, its been proven that puberty doesn't end until early 20s. So even a 17 year old is still likely so full of hormones he/she isnt capable of making a clear decision on weather sex is okay.

*whether.


Do you think most 17 year olds have the capacity to know that shitting on a bathroom floor other people use is not a good idea or does that capacity only happen when people get older?

 

[Rob Roy]

Unless it's anal. There's nothing wrong with anal sex. Amiright fddskunk?

Did you just BUTT in sir?

 

[mollymcgrammar]

Do you have shit on the bottom of your shoe?...Cuz you smell an awful lot like a certain Poopy Pants.

Do all parties have the ability to consent and is all duress absent is the first thing I'd want to know. If that exists, it's not my business to mind other peoples business for them, even if I disagree with their proposed actions is it?

Also, I think the legal definition of what a pedophile is varies from place to place. I'm not interested in a discussion of, or engaging in that kind of relationship, so any affirmative answer wouldn't represent my preference, it would be my observation of what other peoples preferences were. Nice try though.

Have you been eyeing the babysitter again? Yes or no, I don't want to hear any other answer.

Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.

 

[see4]

Did you just BUTT in sir?

You. I see what you did there sir. And it was glorious.

 

[mollymcgrammar]

You. I see what you did there sir. And it was glorious.

Dont give him too much credit. He might try to "butt in" with some grade school kids next.

 

[sheskunk]

Unless it's anal. There's nothing wrong with anal sex. Amiright fddskunk?

An asshole is no different than a vagina, as long as you scrub it first.

 

[Rob Roy]

Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.

Well, you are entitled to your opinion, even when it is based on errors. First of all, dick sucking isn't my thing, but if it's yours that's your business, not mine.

Also, it seems like you've made some gross assumptions without any evidence. My observation that consent is a personal thing is not an endorsement of what every individual does with that ability or a statement that I approve of all persons consensual acts or would replicate them is it?

I actually hope you get off Dolt Mountain and stop wishing people die horrible deaths, it's not very nice.

 

[sheskunk]

Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.

*you're
*you're
*you're

 

[mollymcgrammar]

*you're
*you're
*you're

Sorry, you win. My grammar isnt up to par. My wife is a grammar nazi, she would be disappointed with me.

 

[Rob Roy]

Dont give him too much credit. He might try to "butt in" with some grade school kids next.

Again, that's not anything I'm interested in doing. Your arguments seem weak, so you've taken to creating a false narrative, that's not very becoming sir.

You sure seem to have a hard time accepting that some people developed the ability to control their own body before you claim people are capable of doing so.

How old would a person be before they understand shitting on a floor, in a public bathroom, is a heinous thing to do?

 

[Rob Roy]

Sorry, you win. My grammar isnt up to par. My wife is a grammar nazi, she would be disappointed with me.

No doubt you have disappointed your wife in many ways.

 

[ChesusRice]

No doubt you have disappointed your wife in many ways.

Pretty sick when your thrill in life Is to annoy people

 

[mollymcgrammar]

No doubt you have disappointed your wife in many ways.

Probably not... Im 23 and own a successful buisness, am a good faithful man, and a good father to my child. Plus i dont advocate for fucking children.

 

[Fogdog]

His motive for the law was based in using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices to prevail through the guns of prohibition. It also includes a built in assumption of jail time for people engaging in free and peaceful trade....dumb idea.

You just keep on accepting that addressing symptoms rather than root causes will do anything other than effect a furniture rearrangement. Hey, doesn't that couch look good over there? Thank you government !

When did he say that his motive was based upon using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices?

I don't see how an effort to incrementally legalize MJ while educating people or breaking down false ideas regarding MJ interferes with your grander scheme. I don't know why you would oppose legalizing growing ahead of legalized sales.

 

[mollymcgrammar]

No offense robboy, but the general consensus seems to be that your wrong

 

[Fogdog]

No offense robboy, but the general consensus seems to be that your wrong

He doesn't care about consensus, he cares only about his own grand vision. On the other hand, because he's all talk and not implementation other than at a personal level, I put him in the same category that Earth was described in the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy; "Mostly harmless". So, go along, get along. And always carry a towel.

 

[Rob Roy]

When did he say that his motive was based upon using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices?

I don't see how an effort to incrementally legalize MJ while educating people or breaking down false ideas regarding MJ interferes with your grander scheme. I don't know why you would oppose legalizing growing ahead of legalized sales.

He attempted to defend his sales restriction / prohibition as a way to ensure present price structure, which is artificially high due to prohibition. He wanted to maintain that, using force. I'm not going to bother to go back and search for it though. You can easily if you care to.


I oppose some people running other peoples lives. Nuancing (sic) or only dong it a "little bit" by advancing laws which default to a permission based form of legalization is not something I'm interested in. I'll admit I used to feel the way you do though.

My default position isn't that permission is required from an external authority for free and peaceful people to exist or interact. It's a presumption of authority, I don't grant to others and I won't enable it, if I can prevent it.

Government needs to butt out of cannabis, period.

I'm not interested in better treatment for slaves, I'm interested in ending slavery.

 

[Rob Roy]

He doesn't care about consensus, he cares only about his own grand vision. On the other hand, because he's all talk and not implementation other than at a personal level, I put him in the same category that Earth was described in the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy; "Mostly harmless". So, go along, get along. And always carry a towel.

A consensus to commit an act that deprives peaceful people of self determination is that a good consensus or a bad consensus?

No offense robboy, but the general consensus seems to be that your wrong

No offense, but don't you think your baby sitter is a little young for you?

 

[ChesusRice]

He attempted to defend his sales restriction / prohibition as a way to ensure present price structure, which is artificially high due to prohibition. He wanted to maintain that, using force. I'm not going to bother to go back and search for it though. You can easily if you care to.


I oppose some people running other peoples lives. Nuancing (sic) or only dong it a "little bit" by advancing laws which default to a permission based form of legalization is not something I'm interested in. I'll admit I used to feel the way you do though.

My default position isn't that permission is required from an external authority for free and peaceful people to exist or interact. It's a presumption of authority, I don't grant to others and I won't enable it, if I can prevent it.

Government needs to butt out of cannabis, period.

I'm not interested in better treatment for slaves, I'm interested in ending slavery.

You are wrong on so many levels.
BTW. You're building strawmen to support your strawmen

 

[Fogdog]

A consensus to commit an act that deprives peaceful people of self determination is that a good consensus or a bad consensus?

Good heavens you are so very didactic. For the past 50 years, MJ has been completely illegal. Now change is in the air. But there is still great opposition to any form of legalization. Why would legalizing growing prevent eventual total legalization? Is it all or nothing for you?