• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Legal to grow and possess illegal to sell

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
Actually sir, its been proven that puberty doesn't end until early 20s. So even a 17 year old is still likely so full of hormones he/she isnt capable of making a clear decision on weather sex is okay.
Click to expand...
*whether.


Do you think most 17 year olds have the capacity to know that shitting on a bathroom floor other people use is not a good idea or does that capacity only happen when people get older?
 
mollymcgrammar

mollymcgrammar

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Do you have shit on the bottom of your shoe?...Cuz you smell an awful lot like a certain Poopy Pants.

Do all parties have the ability to consent and is all duress absent is the first thing I'd want to know. If that exists, it's not my business to mind other peoples business for them, even if I disagree with their proposed actions is it?

Also, I think the legal definition of what a pedophile is varies from place to place. I'm not interested in a discussion of, or engaging in that kind of relationship, so any affirmative answer wouldn't represent my preference, it would be my observation of what other peoples preferences were. Nice try though.

Have you been eyeing the babysitter again? Yes or no, I don't want to hear any other answer.
Click to expand...
Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.
Click to expand...
Well, you are entitled to your opinion, even when it is based on errors. First of all, dick sucking isn't my thing, but if it's yours that's your business, not mine.

Also, it seems like you've made some gross assumptions without any evidence. My observation that consent is a personal thing is not an endorsement of what every individual does with that ability or a statement that I approve of all persons consensual acts or would replicate them is it?

I actually hope you get off Dolt Mountain and stop wishing people die horrible deaths, it's not very nice.
 
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
Im just gonna go ahead and say this.... Your a fucking creep. I don't give a shit what you have to say for yourself. Your the kinda guy who ends up with in prison sucking dick for protection because you defended some other creep. Even if you dont act on your desires, your just as bad. I actually hope you get shot and bleed out slowly. Karma tends to let that happen to scumbags like you.
Click to expand...

*you're
*you're
*you're
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
Dont give him too much credit. He might try to "butt in" with some grade school kids next.
Click to expand...
Again, that's not anything I'm interested in doing. Your arguments seem weak, so you've taken to creating a false narrative, that's not very becoming sir.

You sure seem to have a hard time accepting that some people developed the ability to control their own body before you claim people are capable of doing so.

How old would a person be before they understand shitting on a floor, in a public bathroom, is a heinous thing to do?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
His motive for the law was based in using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices to prevail through the guns of prohibition. It also includes a built in assumption of jail time for people engaging in free and peaceful trade....dumb idea.

You just keep on accepting that addressing symptoms rather than root causes will do anything other than effect a furniture rearrangement. Hey, doesn't that couch look good over there? Thank you government !
Click to expand...
When did he say that his motive was based upon using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices?

I don't see how an effort to incrementally legalize MJ while educating people or breaking down false ideas regarding MJ interferes with your grander scheme. I don't know why you would oppose legalizing growing ahead of legalized sales.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
No offense robboy, but the general consensus seems to be that your wrong
Click to expand...
He doesn't care about consensus, he cares only about his own grand vision. On the other hand, because he's all talk and not implementation other than at a personal level, I put him in the same category that Earth was described in the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy; "Mostly harmless". So, go along, get along. And always carry a towel.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
When did he say that his motive was based upon using government as a form of protectionism and to enable artificially high prices?

I don't see how an effort to incrementally legalize MJ while educating people or breaking down false ideas regarding MJ interferes with your grander scheme. I don't know why you would oppose legalizing growing ahead of legalized sales.
Click to expand...

He attempted to defend his sales restriction / prohibition as a way to ensure present price structure, which is artificially high due to prohibition. He wanted to maintain that, using force. I'm not going to bother to go back and search for it though. You can easily if you care to.


I oppose some people running other peoples lives. Nuancing (sic) or only dong it a "little bit" by advancing laws which default to a permission based form of legalization is not something I'm interested in. I'll admit I used to feel the way you do though.

My default position isn't that permission is required from an external authority for free and peaceful people to exist or interact. It's a presumption of authority, I don't grant to others and I won't enable it, if I can prevent it.

Government needs to butt out of cannabis, period.

I'm not interested in better treatment for slaves, I'm interested in ending slavery.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
He doesn't care about consensus, he cares only about his own grand vision. On the other hand, because he's all talk and not implementation other than at a personal level, I put him in the same category that Earth was described in the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy; "Mostly harmless". So, go along, get along. And always carry a towel.
Click to expand...
A consensus to commit an act that deprives peaceful people of self determination is that a good consensus or a bad consensus?

mollymcgrammar said:
No offense robboy, but the general consensus seems to be that your wrong
Click to expand...
No offense, but don't you think your baby sitter is a little young for you?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
He attempted to defend his sales restriction / prohibition as a way to ensure present price structure, which is artificially high due to prohibition. He wanted to maintain that, using force. I'm not going to bother to go back and search for it though. You can easily if you care to.


I oppose some people running other peoples lives. Nuancing (sic) or only dong it a "little bit" by advancing laws which default to a permission based form of legalization is not something I'm interested in. I'll admit I used to feel the way you do though.

My default position isn't that permission is required from an external authority for free and peaceful people to exist or interact. It's a presumption of authority, I don't grant to others and I won't enable it, if I can prevent it.

Government needs to butt out of cannabis, period.

I'm not interested in better treatment for slaves, I'm interested in ending slavery.
Click to expand...
You are wrong on so many levels.
BTW. You're building strawmen to support your strawmen
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
A consensus to commit an act that deprives peaceful people of self determination is that a good consensus or a bad consensus?
Click to expand...
Good heavens you are so very didactic. For the past 50 years, MJ has been completely illegal. Now change is in the air. But there is still great opposition to any form of legalization. Why would legalizing growing prevent eventual total legalization? Is it all or nothing for you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top