zimmerman news

Antidisestablishmentarian · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
there was plenty of reason to bring this in front of a jury from the start, even serino was noting all the lies from zimmerman from the start.

Yet he didn't want to prosecute.

He also believed Zimmermans story.

thecoolman · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
not exactly. they failed to prove their overall case but not every aspect of it.

you don't know what the jurors think about that specific aspect until we (possibly) hear from them later.

generally, the person that runs away is more likely to be the defender than the person who follows with a gun.*

but i know you don't generally like to occupy the same reality as the rest of us.

Unless of course he runs around a corner so he can pounce and sucker punch a block watch man.
Now lets hope the police have enough rounds in case the racists get all LA like after the verdict.

Red1966 · Jul 13, 2013

cologrower said:
This is funny. TM was a 17 year old kid and he was trouble. Mom, Dad, Aunts, Uncles and whoever else don't give TM a care. TM made a decision that many, many 17 year olds would make. Zimmerman new he was trouble and went looking with a gun. Right there he better be careful. He wasn't. He shot and killed somebody. Then it becomes something else. Race gets involved and allegiences are tested. GZ killed a stupid 17 year old hoodlum. I have to deal with that issue. I don't think he was defending himself. He actively looked for a 17 year old then killed him. That I have an issue with. Al Sharpton is an opportunistic pig that promotes racism.

While Zimmerman looked for Martin, he didn't do so to kill him. If Martin hadn't beaten him, Zimmerman wouldn't have killed him. A typical young man, eager to prove his manhood, did something foolish, as the young are wont to do. A frightened middle-aged man, reacted in fear of injury or eminent death, did something he will regret the rest of his life. Too many people with agendas for this to be over yet.

Impman · Jul 13, 2013

Not guilty . The truth has been spoken

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

thecoolman said:
Unless of course he runs around a corner so he can pounce and sucker punch a block watch man.

no evidence for that (still).

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

Red1966 said:
If Martin hadn't beaten him, Zimmerman wouldn't have killed him.

there's as much evidence for a beating as there is for self defense, smarty.

trial's over, you can stop repeating the baseless.

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

TheBeardedClam said:
I generally avoid assaulting the neighborhood watch guy. Nothing good can come of it.

third in a row: trial's over, you can stop repeating your baseless assumptions. there's no evidence that martin assaulted zimm, it is just as consistent with martin defending himself.

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

TheBeardedClam said:
The Jury disagrees with you.

once again, baseless.

you and i have no idea how the jury decided the case or what they thought of certain aspects.

all you have are your assumptions, and you made quite clear in the other thread what you base your assumptions on.

thecoolman · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
third in a row: trial's over, you can stop repeating your baseless assumptions. there's no evidence that martin assaulted zimm, it is just as consistent with martin defending himself.

Yes there was eye witness testimony tm was on top and that he was being the aggressor.
Obviously you smoked something much stronger than what you grow.

ambedexteras · Jul 13, 2013

how did the post in anyway portray aspergers ...boy

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

thecoolman said:
Yes there was eye witness testimony tm was on top and that he was being the aggressor.
Obviously you smoked something much stronger than what you grow.

there was also eye witness testimony that zimm was on top, too. selective memory or just retarded?

by the way, who was on top has no bearing on who started the fight and whether martin was assaulting someone or defending himself.

but a simple mind like yours won't grasp this.

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

TheBeardedClam said:
HAHAHA.... Wait he grows? I thought he just hung around here to give blow jobs to the mods and get people banned?

how many sock puppets are gonna come out of the woodworks tonight?

Red1966 · Jul 13, 2013

londonfog said:
I guess we can now follow anyone and kill them if they fight us.

If you live in Florida.

Red1966 · Jul 13, 2013

beardo said:
Anyone know what channel the rioting is going to be on?

All of them.

NoDrama · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
once again, baseless.

you and i have no idea how the jury decided the case or what they thought of certain aspects.

all you have are your assumptions, and you made quite clear in the other thread what you base your assumptions on.

I will tell you how they all saw it, all of those Jurors, everyone, decided he was not guilty. Not a single one thought otherwise.

You lost, get over it.

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

TheBeardedClam said:
Better give your buddy with the ban hammer another reach around eh.

so what was your previous username then?

Red1966 · Jul 13, 2013

SirGreenThumb said:
I knew that 72% was gonna come though. Rev AL says this is an atrocity..

Rev AL is an atrocity

NoDrama · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
there was also eye witness testimony that zimm was on top, too. selective memory or just retarded?

by the way, who was on top has no bearing on who started the fight and whether martin was assaulting someone or defending himself.

but a simple mind like yours won't grasp this.

By an old lady who wasn't wearing her glasses, all while looking out the window during the night. Yep.

UncleBuck · Jul 13, 2013

NoDrama said:
I will tell you how they all saw it, all of those Jurors, everyone, decided he was not guilty. Not a single one thought otherwise.

You lost, get over it.

tell me right now then how they came to that decision and what they thought about every single individual aspect of the case.

thecoolman · Jul 13, 2013

UncleBuck said:
there was also eye witness testimony that zimm was on top, too. selective memory or just retarded?

by the way, who was on top has no bearing on who started the fight and whether martin was assaulting someone or defending himself.

but a simple mind like yours won't grasp this.

Martins character and history of thug like behavior goes towards circumstantial evidence as well and the testimony of martin doing the beating was much stronger. Lets not forget the testimony regarding martins racism which goes towards motive.

zimmerman news

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member