zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
This is not a RACE issue! This is about lefties vs righties. Z was right handed and TM left. Obviously a hand issue here.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
The lefties are having a shit fit, here is how it really went down:


"8th Grader Trayvon Martin is walking home in his graduation cap and gown


Aryan Nation member George Zimmerman driving around in his Confederate Flag draped pickup


Zimmerman spots Trayvon through the night by the glow of his halo


The Klansman takes chase


The football star nearly outruns him, but he is trapped by a "do not enter" sign


Faced with certain death or disobeying the law, he makes his stand


Trayvon attempts to reason his attacker, but the illiterate racist will have none of it


Zimmerman steps out of his vehicle and asks "Any last words?"


Trayvon looks his executioner in the eye and replies "World Peace"


"WHITE POWER!" exclaims Zimmerman as he unloads with his fully-automatic assault rifle


If not for the Republican party he may have survived, but the skinhead's extended magazine, unfettered by their legislation unloads hundreds of rounds into the future Nobel Peace Prize recipient


Zimmerman then bashes his own head into the curb repeatedly screaming "help me!"


When he is finished, Hitler himself steps back into his gas-guzzling vehicle


As Trayvon lay dying, the last thing he sees is the "Bush Cheney 2004" bumper sticker disapear into the night"
Click to expand...
so funny! thank you
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Okie dokie. Boycott the institution that steals the money to fund the "public" transportation. Oh wait, you "can't" boycott the government....is that because we're free?
Click to expand...
let me refresh your memory: the boycotts weren't completely effective, it still took the federal government intervening to stop states from acting unconstitutionally.

you don't just abuse the language, you rape it like it owed you money.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
let me refresh your memory: the boycotts weren't completely effective, it still took the federal government intervening to stop states from acting unconstitutionally.

you don't just abuse the language, you rape it like it owed you money.
Click to expand...
If the transportation company was privately held it would be much harder for them to discriminate and survive financially. Sooner or later another private business would come along (assuming government didn't intervene and throw a bunch of red tape in the way) and the first one, the discriminating one, would be out competed.

Your beloved "public transportation" was able to discriminate and get away with it for a long time.

Also using the FEDERAL Government as a shining example of adherence to the Constitution won't last long. Abusing the language. That's funny. You are the one that assigns two separate meanings to the same act.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
If the transportation company was privately held it would be much harder for them to discriminate and survive financially. Sooner or later another private business would come along (assuming government didn't intervene and throw a bunch of red tape in the way) and the first one, the discriminating one, would be out competed.
Click to expand...
demonstrably false, hence why the civil rights act included section II.

are you a child? learning impaired? brain damaged?

no grasp on history, no grasp on what simple words mean...pathetic.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
demonstrably false, hence why the civil rights act included section II.

are you a child? learning impaired? brain damaged?

no grasp on history, no grasp on what simple words mean...pathetic.
Click to expand...
So poor customer service DOESN'T lose a business customers in a truly free market? Now who's learning impaired?

I see you cherry pick your answers. How can theft mean one thing when you or I do it, yet if a group of people do it, the meaning changes? Please explain that to 'dis po brain damaged chile.
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
demonstrably false, hence why the civil rights act included section II.

are you a child? learning impaired? brain damaged?

no grasp on history, no grasp on what simple words mean...pathetic.
Click to expand...
The civil rights act is immoral, it is a violation of basic human rights
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So poor customer service DOESN'T lose a business customers in a truly free market? Now who's learning impaired?
Click to expand...
many, many businesses kept their doors open while refusing service to blacks (or others). this is mundane, empirical fact.

are you stupid?

Rob Roy said:
I see you cherry pick your answers. How can theft mean one thing when you or I do it, yet if a group of people do it, the meaning changes? Please explain that to 'dis po brain damaged chile.
Click to expand...
you do not use words properly.

when someone signs a W2 consenting to taxation, that is not theft.

when someone moves to a location knowing what the taxes will be like there, that is consent, not theft.

that you're an idiot who does not know how to use words properly does not condemn the fact that i do know how to use those words correctly.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
many, many businesses kept their doors open while refusing service to blacks (or others). this is mundane, empirical fact.

are you stupid?



you do not use words properly.

when someone signs a W2 consenting to taxation, that is not theft.

when someone moves to a location knowing what the taxes will be like there, that is consent, not theft.

that you're an idiot who does not know how to use words properly does not condemn the fact that i do know how to use those words correctly.
Click to expand...

You've avoided answering the question, so I'll do it for you. It is a poor business practice to eliminate potential paying customers based on skin color. If a company continuously does that they have created a ripe opportunity for a competitor to kick their ass.

Am I stupid? No.

W-2's signing? Is there a choice for a person that does not involve a government threat to do otherwise? "Consent" derived under a threat isn't consent.

When somebody moves to a place knowing that a law is in place, you are saying that provides consent? Okay. A person smokes weed in a prohibition state. A storm trooper kicks in their door and the person is hauled off to jail. You are saying that they "consented" to that action of the jackboot because they occupied a given physical area? Have you been sniffing glue again?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You've avoided answering the question, so I'll do it for you. It is a poor business practice to eliminate potential paying customers based on skin color. If a company continuously does that they have created a ripe opportunity for a competitor to kick their ass.

Am I stupid? No.
Click to expand...
clearly you are stupid, or at the very least ignorant, as you are ignoring the fact that businesses that did what you described had no problem keeping their doors open and their lights on.

basic history, child.


Rob Roy said:
W-2's signing? Is there a choice for a person that does not involve a government threat to do otherwise?
Click to expand...
there are lots of other choices.
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
clearly you are stupid, or at the very least ignorant, as you are ignoring the fact that businesses that did what you described had no problem keeping their doors open and their lights on.

basic history, child.




there are lots of other choices.
Click to expand...
Why are you so against people having the right to choose?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
Why are you so against people having the right to choose?
Click to expand...
i am all for everyone having the right to choose, without fear of being denied service by a racist property owner.

i am also for equal protection of the law, as codified in our constitution.

why do you hate the constitution? why do you hate the 14th amendment? why do you hate equal protection of the law?
 
homegrwn

homegrwn

Well-Known Member
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
It can't be manslaughter. He was found not guilty of manslaughter.
Click to expand...

REREAD I said If they find him guilty which based on watching the whole thing tells me the prosecutor wasnt going to let it happen regardless of white Fucc whoever whatever. If anyone watched a second of this shit on tv they would see with there own eyes that it wasn't anyone's fault but the prosecution and the defendant....period...race should never be an issue... but people make it an issue cause they feel entitled. In my area we all one people and most of us carry guns.. Make it about race and you can pretty much kiss all our ass's....ty have a nice day..
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
TM could have gotten home four times over in the time when he was "lost" to Zimmerman.
Click to expand...
and zimmerman could have gone back to his car 8 times.

it's crystal clear that you think the black kid should have known his place, and have never applied the same standard to zimm.

you racist douche.
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i am all for everyone having the right to choose, without fear of being denied service by a racist property owner.

i am also for equal protection of the law, as codified in our constitution.

why do you hate the constitution? why do you hate the 14th amendment? why do you hate equal protection of the law?
Click to expand...
The fourteenth amendment wasn't part of the constitution and what you are saying is that the people should have a right to choose, unless they are the owner of something then the people override the owners right to choose, and you want the govt to make the decisions and be in charge of the enforcement of such
Isn't that called communism?
Why shouldn't the owner of something be allowed to decide who he will serve or who is allowed or what he wants to do and how he wants to do it?
why should someone be forced to make associations he would choose not to?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
and zimmerman could have gone back to his car 8 times.

it's crystal clear that you think the black kid should have known his place, and have never applied the same standard to zimm.

you racist douche.
Click to expand...
What is clear is that Martin came back and ambushed Z just like Z claimed. If TM hadn't cold cocked Z he would still be alive.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
The fourteenth amendment wasn't part of the constitution
Click to expand...
it is now, deal with it.

beardo said:
and what you are saying is that the people should have a right to choose, unless they are the owner of something then the people override the owners right to choose, and you want the govt to make the decisions and be in charge of the enforcement of such
Isn't that called communism?
Why shouldn't the owner of something be allowed to decide who he will serve or who is allowed or what he wants to do and how he wants to do it?
why should someone be forced to make associations he would choose not to?
Click to expand...
owning a business does not allow you to violate the constitution.

why do you hate the constitution?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top