crazyhazey
Well-Known Member
for a majority of these posts, this is probably true. but some strains seem to be more repeated, im gonna stay away from barneys nowits not the strain that sucks its the growers that suck at growing lol
for a majority of these posts, this is probably true. but some strains seem to be more repeated, im gonna stay away from barneys nowits not the strain that sucks its the growers that suck at growing lol
You may be right but I warn you this was some terrible smoke. It was like smoking a cigar and inhaling every hit.I'm thinking this might be a high cbd / low thc strain.
From info found here: http://www.cannabis-seeds-bank.co.uk/green-house-seeds-el-nino-feminized/prod_341.html
THC Level : 12.0%
It's effect is a smooth body feeling, very pleasant high and long lasting.
not always my friend.. i have had one or two shit grows, but i know that it was something that i did, and would never write off the genetics i had a shit grow with cuz i'm a big boy and can admit my faults..its not the strain that sucks its the growers that suck at growing lol
who's ssh was that robert?? just asking 'cuz i know a few different breeders all have their version of ssh..super silver haze , too sensitive for my shitty water here to high salt content
no way, it is never the growers fault robert, wtf man, lol... mighty man of you to admit to it..i think it was nirvana , i choose it after seeing many threads on perfect grows in diff parts of the country , the prob was on my side not the strain
Did you know that fully half of American adults are of below average intelligence?Hey Buds,
Why can't breeders eliminate all bad phenotypes so that we're not growing shit half the time?.
Anyone??
Well, I *would* say it (and did, above!).i wouldnt say a hybrid CANNOT be stabilized, just a lot of companies aren't spending the years it takes to to completely stabilize it.
That's certainly possible, and likely a contributing factor.The conclusion here is that "someone" thinks every strain is the worst. Some of the best I have ever grown are mentioned here as worst. Think it could be a function of the grower more than the strain? I do.
That's called leveraging ones position. While his genetics may or may not be weak, you can't fault the guy for giving the masses what they want. Sub gets mad respect from me for that. In the end people will speak with their wallets, so far people are still speaking to him.i mean, do i really need a tga lighter leash?? and does he really need the $.99 he just made selling it to me?? ....
All very true. I think it comes down to economics - there simply isn't a return on investment for the rigorous process you describe. The root of the problem is lack of a discriminating customer base. The number of people growing is exploding so fast that not that many care about wild variances, just so it grows and gets them high. I almost exclusively grow Northern Lights from Nirvana. Old strain as stable as any, but even there I get a huge plant now and then.That's certainly possible, and likely a contributing factor.
I would still add the following, though:
-There is absolutely no standardization or enforcement in the world of cannabis seed breeding. So different breeders versions of the same "strain" can, in fact, have entirely different genetics. But a pack of so called "white widow" and not only are the phenotypes from different breeders going to be vastly different, the fundamental genetics of the plants in question will probably vary quite a bit too!
-Even more maddening, packs of the SAME seeds, from the SAME breeder released at different times can have different genetics! That's because breeders do change their lines, and in some cases, the lines evolve over time (not always for the better). Also, some breeders are less than perfectly meticulous about their seed operations, and the seeds in the pack may not actually be the ones promised on the label!
-Unless you're dealing with a true inbred line (and most of the more interesting/popular strains are NOT inbred), even within one pack of seeds you may end up with a fairly wide variety of phenotypes (see my last post above as to why this is true).
A good breeder "should" at least partially stabilize any commercial offering they put out so that you stand a reasonable change of getting one or more plants with that "killer" phenotype, but a. they don't all do it, and b. no matter how well they do, "dumb luck" plays a role. With 10 seeds in a pack, you may have a situation where 2 don't germinate or make it past seedling stage, and of the remaining 8, 5 are male. Now you're down to only three females from your pack. Again, without getting into probabilities and complicated genetics here, if you're only picking from three offspring, you well may draw the "short straw" and end up with three inferior phenotypes.
So all these things may explain, in some part, why excellent grower "A" gets great results with a particular strain, even though excellent grower "B" does not.
Go with clones and you will know exactly what you are getting.got a bad batch of Reserva Pervada OG.....First go around the og was the kind... lemony funk .
A year later ordered another fem pack..they were shitty... not one keeper or anything worth smokin...it was like it wasn't even the OG
thats the problem with seeds...your at the mercy of the supplier and breeder.... they can send you whatever they want to and you wont know the difference