Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in boldThere are two sides to the equation. Your assumption only looks at one side and declares that a relationship can be justified on the decision of ONE of the parties rather than BOTH of the parties involved.
If both parties to an interaction are not consenting to it, you would then be condoning using force to create or enable the relationship.
You can do anything you want with YOUR property....but you can't do anything you want with somebody else property.
If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black