What level of gun control do you support?

What level of gun control do you support?


  • Total voters
    61

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
There are two sides to the equation. Your assumption only looks at one side and declares that a relationship can be justified on the decision of ONE of the parties rather than BOTH of the parties involved.

If both parties to an interaction are not consenting to it, you would then be condoning using force to create or enable the relationship.


You can do anything you want with YOUR property....but you can't do anything you want with somebody else property.
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in bold

If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in bold

If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black
I wouldn't let you because you dont have a job to pay for the services/products in my store.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in bold

If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black
How do you prove intent?
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
ah what a great spot to say i busted my forehead via scope and kickback. retarded me, too many pain pills i guess, im no newb.

everyone was laughing at me when i got back
 

budlover13

King Tut
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in bold

If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black
I don't believe anyone has the "right to spend money anyway/where they want". That is up to the seller of goods imo. That's just how I conduct business. The seller holds the reins, until the buyer meets his price. Negotiations usually come into play.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't let you because you dont have a job to pay for the services/products in my store.
and also because he's black, and according to you, "multiculturalism works best when an ocean separates each culture".

and you claim to be a good christian.

LOL!

fuckwad.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I don't believe anyone has the "right to spend money anyway/where they want". That is up to the seller of goods imo. That's just how I conduct business. The seller holds the reins, until the buyer meets his price. Negotiations usually come into play.
so you also object to civil rights, like rawn pawl the racist?

how can you object to civil rights and claim to be anything other than 100% racist?
 

red w. blue

Well-Known Member


If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black
If I don't wish to trade my property for yours tuff shit. If I don't want you on one of my properties I will tell you to go and you WILL GO. If not fast then you will be removed. You being black will cut no ice with me.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

If I don't wish to trade my property for yours tuff shit. If I don't want you on one of my properties I will tell you to go and you WILL GO. If not fast then you will be removed. You being black will cut no ice with me.
so, newest sock puppet, let me ask you this:

do you think it should be legal to deny service to people based on race?

it kinda seems like you do. your debut portrays you as an angry racist.

but hey, i might be wrong.

you might have just created an account and immediately started posting in politics because you are not a racist loser sock puppet.

ya never know.
 

budlover13

King Tut
so you also object to civil rights, like rawn pawl the racist?

how can you object to civil rights and claim to be anything other than 100% racist?
Spending your money when and how you wish isn't a civil right imo. Might be in your mind, i guess. But if it were, pedos could rent kids, spouses could pay for murder for hire, and I could buy fully auto firearms.

Edit : I am kinda liking where this is going. Anybody gets to spend their money how they wish. Wonder if I can get someone to ship a full-auto conversion kit to Kali using this argument?

"But it's my civil rights "!
 

red w. blue

Well-Known Member
so, newest sock puppet, let me ask you this:

do you think it should be legal to deny service to people based on race?

it kinda seems like you do. your debut portrays you as an angry racist.

but hey, i might be wrong.

you might have just created an account and immediately started posting in politics because you are not a racist loser sock puppet.

ya never know.
I have little doubt you are wrong far more often you post and you are fine with it. You seem to be an angry kid, may be you have a hand up your ass and you are sock puppet is that why you are angry?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Spending your money when and how you wish isn't a civil right imo. Might be in your mind, i guess. But if it were, pedos could rent kids, spouses could pay for murder for hire, and I could buy fully auto firearms.

Edit : I am kinda liking where this is going. Anybody gets to spend their money how they wish. Wonder if I can get someone to ship a full-auto conversion kit to Kali using this argument?

"But it's my civil rights "!
it's hilarious how white power folks like you try to compare being denied service at hotels and gas stations based on your skin color to being unable to fuck children or buy fully automatic killing machines.

do you really think that your inability to buy children for your pedophilia fetish is anything like being denied a room at a motel because of your skin color?

why would you even make such a stupid fucking analogy?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I have little doubt you are wrong far more often you post and you are fine with it. You seem to be an angry kid, may be you have a hand up your ass and you are sock puppet is that why you are angry?
easy killer.

i asked a simple question based on your fiery entrance.

do you think it should be legal to deny service to people based on race?
 

red w. blue

Well-Known Member
easy killer.

i asked a simple question based on your fiery entrance.

do you think it should be legal to deny service to people based on race?
I don't service anyone at this time. If or when I do it will be someone that I care a lot for. I thjnk it should legal to deny anyone or any org. anything, like the gov. taxes if they don't spend it a way I like. While you and the question may be simple the answer may not be, and I don't owe you anything.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
The term "public business" is a sleight of hand, created to rationalize the forcible imposition of some people into other peoples lives.

Every life that isn't yours, which you are not invited into, is a "private business" .


I usually don't judge things or base my actions on legality OR illegality. For instance, although it would have been illegal for me to assist a runaway slave years ago, I would have broken the law and helped that person gain their freedom.

Question the status quo. It's good for you.
but would you demand for that hungry mistreated slave to be allowed to eat a simple meal at any restaurant that was open to the public ? Also If you had a neighbor who had a private business that involved selling 13 year girls as sex slaves would you then make it your business to judge and deem this as illegal
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Then you don't get to claim what you have here in bold

If I'm a black guy and you don't let me into your business then I can't do anything I want with my property. I want to spend my property in your store, you won't let me because I'm black

You conveniently omit that in the course of "doing what you want with your property" that doesn't give you the right to "do anything you want" with somebody else property, as in make another party engage in a forcible exchange. You would then be taking away their right to use THEIR property as they want to.

Are you really that dense or just fucking with me?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
but would you demand for that hungry mistreated slave to be allowed to eat a simple meal at any restaurant that was open to the public ? Also If you had a neighbor who had a private business that involved selling 13 year girls as sex slaves would you then make it your business to judge and deem this as illegal

All people should be free to own themselves and their justly acquired property. I believe that, you do not.

My belief that no person should be another persons slave is consistent with the idea that no person has the right to force another person to associate with them or has a right to determine the use of property that isn't theirs.

You correctly abhor slavery, (which is a forced human association) then contradict yourself when you champion another kind of forced human association.


So, tell me can you or I delegate a right to another person which we don't possess?
 
Top