While you argue that this drug should be illegal, the next post you are telling someone to go do it for a week... Amazing.
sync0s... you're dropping the context of his argument, and then using it against him. I think his opinion on this is wrong, but what you just did there was dishonest. I've seen your arguments in here and I didn't expect that from you...
londonfog, nobody I've seen here is saying that heroin isn't a sure way to throw your life in the gutter. Carthoris has a hell of a good point I'd like to expand a bit. With as many people in this country as there is, there are almost as many different value systems. Who gets to decide? What if Romney or Huntsman gets in the White House? They're both Mormon, and if they hold true to their beliefs, they think ANY non-medicinal mind altering substance is not just harmful, but a moral wrong. What is to stop them from signing an executive order to outlaw those substances? JWH-018 (a synthetic cannabinoid) was just banned earlier this year, and not even by executive order - but by bureaucratic means from the DEA.
So who gets to decide what we are allowed to do? Are you going to leave this decision up to politicians and bureaucrats, who make these arbitrary decisions with special interest groups and the next election in mind? Or would you leave this to each and every individual to do what they think is best for themselves, based on each person's beliefs and values? I'm not asking you to answer any of these questions (they're more for others to ponder), but if possible I would like you to answer the following question with stark-naked honesty.
In conceptual terms, what is government's proper role, purpose, and limit (if any) in our lives? I don't need specifics, but I looking for more general ideas of what it should and should not do.
Anyone else here feel free to take a stab at this, I'd love to hear your answers (but I think I can guess a few of your answers already).