Should Insurance Companies Have to Take Back Their Customers

feasy · Nov 21, 2013

NoDrama said:
You proved that rescission happens, you NEVER proved that Insurance companies dumped people off the plans because theyt got too expensive, which is EXACTLY what you have claimed.

The best part is that you keep claiming that my numbers of people that those 3 health insurers cover is made up, a fabrication, yet you don't even TRY to back up that claim. If my numbers are a fabrication as you have claimed, the onus is on you to prove such , not mine, but since you don't want to humiliate yourself I will just have to do it for you.

UnitedHealth alone serves more than 70 million people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UnitedHealth_Group

Wellpoint Serves 67 Million people http://www.wellpoint.com/prodcontrib/groups/wellpoint/@wp_news_main/documents/wlp_assets/pw_d014892.pdf

do you think Assurant, the 4th largest insurer in the US, has less then 8 million customers? Do ya?

United Health group, Wellpoint and Assurant are global companies that have customers outside the US there are only 300+ million Americans 48 million have no insurance and almost 40 million on Medicare. Since I think we are only talking about America and I gave you more than one link where the CEO's of two of those companies admitted to congress they did just that an congress has 20,000 confirmed US cases If the US congress can find 20,000 how many really happened?

Feel free to revise your numbers at any point

feasy · Nov 21, 2013

Antidisestablishmentarian said:
Well according to the cbo, it's now going to have to help insure 120 million people. Your 40-48 million, plus the roughly 80 million that will lose coverage due to the law.

That's not a good thing.

People will lose there current plans. Individual plans need to be renewed yearly just like people with jobs do open enrollment yearly. The law states that plans now have to meet some basic heath criteria. So where some would default into the same plan they had the year before 2 million people will not have that option as the plan they have will not be available. So "lose" coverage is not true they will lose the option to renew their plan they can buy a new plan from the same company .

Also most people with individual plans have children or pre-existing conditions and the new laws should benefit them as they can no longer be charged more for there coverage and their children can stay on their plan longer.

UncleBuck · Nov 21, 2013

Rob Roy said:
Well if I made a racial slur, it was not intended.

you present yourself as some sort of intellectual but you didn't think calling the president a mulatto was a racial slur?

either you are as dumb as i thought you were or you were unabashedly making a racial slur and didn't expect to be called out on it.

you tell me which it is.

Antidisestablishmentarian said:
roughly 80 million that will lose coverage due to the law.

beenthere · Nov 21, 2013

feasy said:
People will lose there current plans. Individual plans need to be renewed yearly just like people with jobs do open enrollment yearly. The law states that plans now have to meet some basic heath criteria. So where some would default into the same plan they had the year before 2 million people will not have that option as the plan they have will not be available. So "lose" coverage is not true they will lose the option to renew their plan they can buy a new plan from the same company .

Also most people with individual plans have children or pre-existing conditions and the new laws should benefit them as they can no longer be charged more for there coverage and their children can stay on their plan longer.

LMAO If you think pissing on peoples legs and trying to tell them it's raining is going to work, you're very naive.

Should Insurance Companies Have to Take Back Their Customers

feasy

Member

feasy

Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

beenthere

New Member