UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that wouldn't be the first thing you've deluded yourself into believing.
Should Insurance Companies Have to Take Back Their Customers
- Thread starter beenthere
- Start date
feasy
Member
Naw Feasy doesn't give a fuck about your fake numbers. I can see from just a few post you say what you think with no proof and or back knowledge so I don't expect you to say anything factual.
If it only happens .0027% of the time, its not really happening much at all, which I presume is because rescinding on "bullshit" reasons would actually be illegal and so the insurance companies only do it to people whom they can prove as having committed omissions in order to deceive or fraud.
If you had a million dollars and you earned .0027% interest per year. How much money would you have at the end of one year?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
your presumption is mostly correct, but there are some legitimate horror stories out there about getting rescinded for truly bullshit reasons at truly horrifying times.
the timing is what makes it such a horrendous thing to do, as you don't get rescinded when you don't really need insurance.
Too scared?
C'Mon, show us you got the balls like bucky does to take being flat assed wrong. I mean just 100% fucking utterly WRONG, and then be a man about it and accept it.
a tiny number of people does not make an entire industry a bunch of immoral jerks
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hard for a broke person with massive medical bills to mount any kind of legal challenge against an army of insurance company lawyers.
I completely edited my response after RE reading yours and getting the better gist of it, my apologies. I thought I got it in time, but alas I did not.
Most lawyers would salivate at the thought of a percentage fee based on the outcome if it were a good case. A GOOD case against a BIG company with DEEP pockets doesn't usually cost the plaintiff anything up front.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sure it does.
it didn't take the whole third reich to wipe out six million jews, just a small percentage of the soldiers took care of that part.
feasy
Member
You asked me to prove it happens I show you where the CEO's of companies go in front of the House of Representatives and admit it. Since it didn't fit into your narrative you deny it exist then you make up numbers to minimize it.
Now you want me to prove you wrong
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
I thought that was Buck's new log on after the second post.
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
Just imagine if Romney were elected and stirred up all this shit.
The liberal media would have been calling for impeachment since the "law" was declared "constitutional" by the liberal supreme court.
The liberal media would have been calling for impeachment since the "law" was declared "constitutional" by the liberal supreme court.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there is no need to put "law" and "constitutional" into quotes.
the law was found constitutional, and all your sandy vaginaism ain't gonna change that.
and there is no need to imagine a romney administration, as he put his ideas in front of the american people and was roundly rejected in yet another obama electoral landslide.
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
Ya, LIBERAL majority is really the talking point.
Here you go with your 1% or 2% "landslide".
More like a mudslide.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what liberal majority? the court leans slightly conservative right now.
and obama's electoral landslide gave him 62% of the electoral votes (ya know, the ones that matter). 62-38 is a 24 percentage point win.
suck it, every freudian slip lets us know that your latent side is just dying to do so.
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
It depends on where you live.
I watched the election on the liberal news channels.
No more than 52/48 at any given time.
Obama was the popular vote.
echelon1k1
New Member
like comparing your life partner to a walrus?
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
I'll bet both Bucky and his wife weigh in at 250-350lbs.
They were rejected in their teens only to be accepted by pedifiles and losers.
