Red1966
Well-Known Member
You're predicting I'll live another 10,000 years? I predict you're an idiot NOW.
Report: All Major Oil Companies Knew of Climate Change by 1970s
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I believe in your ability to maintain your idiocy beyond the grave. Call it faith, if you like.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Hot summers, fuck yeah. The hotter the better.
My Excursion is built on the F250 and has a 6.8l V10. The only fat thing that rides in my truck is my wallet.
"We liberals are stupid. We let leaders lie to us and destroy our future so THEY can make more money at your expense."
In two sentences you just summed up the entire MMGW movement/scam.
Well done.
2ANONYMOUS
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
You never answered my question, does your (moms) house run completely off the grid?
How did the previous record set in 1898 happen? Was there lots of global warming then too? You seem to think that every heat record has some kind of nefarious beginning started by humans.
How were all those previous records set if it wasn't global warming?
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Don't bother ND. Introducing logic to an Eco-Loon is like trying to convince a Christian that their imaginary deity doesn't exist. This shit is a religion to these naive zealots. Sit back, smoke a bowl and watch the circus. From what I've read, you, like myself, can survive the financial fallout if they get their wishlist of legislation. Watching the masses revolt against them, due to the staggering increases in gas, energy and every product that they buy, will be hilarious.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you predicted that under obama, the cost of energy and gas would "necessarily skyrocket".
i just paid $1.60 a gallon.
nothing you ever say is right, ever.
if you say it, i can guarantee it is wrong. every time.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Such people are highly reliable; listen to them carefully and then do the opposite of what they say!
It seems there are a lot of those people here...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You're mistaken
What natural event caused this increase in temperature in ~130 years?
Science says C02, you disagree, so what was it? You don't get to just say "Not C02!".. OK, so it wasn't the C02 increase, so then.. what was it? What did this? Where's the cause?
Identify a cause then show me your work
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
How much was spent to study and come out with this misleading study ?
It was well known to all that the burning of fossil fuels caused pollution. The reason they didn`t call it a breath of fresh air is because of damage it will cause.
Polluting the air, no matter how or where was given that definition for the same reason every time. even today we know that air pollution isn`t because the tide goes in and out, it`s because the air will change it`s properties (pollution). All leads to the same conclusion, well before the teens and twenties,.....
The deal in the seventies that was kept on the low was that the time frame was drawing near, not that it was accurately predicted and scientifically proven.
Now we are on the other side of center, but many moons to go before we die daily from it.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Reread what you wrote and ask yourself if this is the best, most concise way to express your opinion
I'm positive I'm not the only one with this opinion, I'm not interested in reading jumbled incoherent ramblings that resemble Navajo dialogue. I've skipped your posts for the past couple months because of this.
Again, just my opinion, but you really need to work on this.
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
you really should talk to london fog on the same topic
2ANONYMOUS
Well-Known Member
Pada Do you not believe we,are not to blame for any of it ??? I look at earth as a web one string snaps its effects everything
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
There are both natural and anthropogenic factors that affect the climate, of course
The problem with the natural argument when looking at the period between 1880-present is that there is no known naturally occurring variable that can explain the rate of change we've observed today. Natural variations occur over thousands of years, not hundreds. This change has taken place over the course of 135 years.
I would guess natural v. anthropogenic variables are around 10/90 for the current warming trend
2ANONYMOUS
Well-Known Member
Well i look at some indicators for one when oil started getting pumped out of the ground the increase in volcanic eruptions , Earthquakes there is no doubt According to the EM-DAT, the total natural disasters reported each year has been steadily increasing in recent decades, from 78 in 1970 to 348 in 2004. what could be causing this ??? sure we can say well its natural, and we also can say well with the amount of sinkholes , mud slides do to man destruction lumber business major cause of mud slides has anyone ever wondered what a full grown spruce tree drinks in one year as in volume of water ???? now remove 1000's of trees from a area ???
Where does the underground water go now ???
When pumping oil out of the ground what fills up them empty porous rocks when all oil is taken ??
Now i have drilled injection wells, Fracking , etc pumping everything from steam to chemical to get what ever oil is remaining but this also creates pollution, as in H2S contaminting water and so on
to give you a idea cause many people tend to forget the mass in oil pumped out on a daily basis or even what the world uses in one day .. here we use three billion, five hundred and seventy million gallons of oil (3,570,000,000). DAILY and that is 3.billion 570 million barrels
Niagara falls has a flow rate of 150,000 U.S. gallons per second.
3,570,000,000 of oil / 150,000 gallons per second = 23,800 seconds of flow equivalent.
In other words, if by some horrific means you were able to replace the flow over niagara falls with nothing but oil for 6.6 hours a day, that’s how much oil the 6 billion inhabitants of the earth burn every single day of every year
puts a new meaning to everything i mean you think
Where does the underground water go now ???
When pumping oil out of the ground what fills up them empty porous rocks when all oil is taken ??
Now i have drilled injection wells, Fracking , etc pumping everything from steam to chemical to get what ever oil is remaining but this also creates pollution, as in H2S contaminting water and so on
to give you a idea cause many people tend to forget the mass in oil pumped out on a daily basis or even what the world uses in one day .. here we use three billion, five hundred and seventy million gallons of oil (3,570,000,000). DAILY and that is 3.billion 570 million barrels
Niagara falls has a flow rate of 150,000 U.S. gallons per second.
3,570,000,000 of oil / 150,000 gallons per second = 23,800 seconds of flow equivalent.
In other words, if by some horrific means you were able to replace the flow over niagara falls with nothing but oil for 6.6 hours a day, that’s how much oil the 6 billion inhabitants of the earth burn every single day of every year
puts a new meaning to everything i mean you think
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
6.6 hours of that, every day, in oil..
It's pretty amazing people still exist who believe that can't affect the planet..
2ANONYMOUS
Well-Known Member
and people wonder why things are speeding up lol as in global warming , oceans heating up but YEAH keep thinking its natural , Cause LIKE fuck it is
Similar threads
