UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
maybe you should volunteer yourself as that one then just to get it out of the way since, in your opinion, government is infallible and has never executed an innocent person.
Humane Execution
- Thread starter Nutes and Nugs
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so will you volunteer to be the one innocent person executed then?
put your money where your mouth is, poolboy.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
I have no hesitation whatsoever in agreeing with Dr. K., because simply put, society has the right to protect itself.
No human endeavor will ever be perfect, however, once eliminated, the convicted vermin will indeed be unable to perpetrate any additional heinous depravity ever again.
A foolproof safeguard.
That is a certainty.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Rak on Tur'
Active Member
I think the first place to stat would be by only allowing federal use of the death penalty. States who use the death penalty do not have all the safeguards of the federal system.
In the federal system the individual's life can't be used as some sort of bargaining chip. That isn't the case with state systems.
In the federal system the individual's life can't be used as some sort of bargaining chip. That isn't the case with state systems.
Doer
Well-Known Member
And the law worked.
I saw a video of a guy down in Texas. They were cooking a little barbeque out back with maybe only 7-8 people. The scrappy and smallish, father had found his 7 year old girl, being mounted by some guy behind the shed !!!!!!.
He beat him to death.
The video starts as this father is having a beak down over the fact that he killed the guy. He kept screaming, "save him, save him!" Just hysterical. The girl was not hurt and nothing happened. He was just in time to break up a very ugly thing, but then he went ahead and murdered the guy before his daughter's very eyes. Woops.
The Sheriffs, however, were so concerned about the father, they didn't even take him in. They stayed with the family and talked to him soothingly, while the coroner cleaned up.
Justified. And that is Texas.
Last edited:
tightpockt
Well-Known Member
I just don't see what the up side is.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Or to execution?
No upside that I can see. It costs a lot of money. But we just had a State referendum IN SELF RULE, IRISH, SELF RULE and the DP is still here. Fun facts on the cost of retribution for the People, that pay for it.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty
No upside that I can see. It costs a lot of money. But we just had a State referendum IN SELF RULE, IRISH, SELF RULE and the DP is still here. Fun facts on the cost of retribution for the People, that pay for it.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Robots.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
We could put it on Pay Per View to fund their restitution :]
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
except of course the falsely accused innocent. they get to die for your homicide boner.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Like the handfuls of people that die in Chicago every weekend despite the tough gun restrictions? How about the innocent people in the crossfire? You just keep wanting to make civilians the victims and dependent upon the government. Got to hand it to you for being consistant. Oh, and totally hypocritical as you state you want to buy a gun but your wife wont let you... LOL!!! I cant figure out which one of those is funnier...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm not sure what any of your blathering about chicago has to do with the fact that the death penalty ends up killing innocent folks.
when did i ever say my wife wouldn't let me buy a gun? if you can cite that, i will stop pointing out what a racist you are.
DonAlejandroVega
Well-Known Member
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
They should call it terminator. It'll be huge
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
there is no mitigation for accomplices to a murder.
mitigation comes in to play when the defendant in a homicide tries to explain why he killed a dude (self defense, crazy, accident, etc) not for 2 asshats who HELPED a killer before during and after his murder of 2 cops and a mounty.
if they had been in possession of more than one gun, all 3 might have taken some shots.
as it stands, all 3 WERE party to the crime before, during and after, and all 3 should have received some Lethal Interjection
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
thats not Murder, murder is a 187, he did a 189, justifiable homicide.
Agreed, killing a grown man you actively catch in the process of raping your 7 year old is not only justified, I'd have to question any man who didn't do so.
As to "humane" it has to be heroin. Have a nurse put an IV in me, lock me in a room with a few grams, a candle and a spoon and syringe to access the IV, I'm not walking out.
What would be cruel is to administer it all at once, which might deny the recipient of the rush.
As to "humane" it has to be heroin. Have a nurse put an IV in me, lock me in a room with a few grams, a candle and a spoon and syringe to access the IV, I'm not walking out.
What would be cruel is to administer it all at once, which might deny the recipient of the rush.