Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
The execution should be done the same way they did their victims...Period!
Humane Execution
- Thread starter Nutes and Nugs
- Start date
The execution should be done the same way they did their victims...Period!
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
You're fucked up. Who's going to want to rape and stab someone? How is that healthy? If someone did something so horrific they need to be executed, just do it quickly and move on. The point of the execution isn't to antagonize the prisoner, it's to rid society of further threats from the individual.
In your fucked up mind, the objective of the Justice System is to dole out equal amounts of savagery; an eye for an eye. It's not.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Depends. Did we declare a "war on scumbags" first? Then it would be totally acceptable as collateral damage. Hell, only one? We 'll take that as long as "our guy" is doing it and cheer.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if you execute 99,999 depraved murderers and rapists, yet only bag one guy who didnt do it, thats a pretty good record for reliability
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Only a sick person like you would think i meant the rape part.
They should have the same death as their victims.
If you mutilated someone to death you get the same.
Bullet to the head the same thing you get and so on.
And the more un-humane it is i bet would be a much better deterent.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
If deterrence is all that matters, why not execute people for J-walking or for not wearing bike helmets? I bet you'd see results.
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
weak attempt
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
WOOOOOORRRRDDDDZZZZ strikes again!
Another epic novella of top notch wordplay.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
And who is going to do these..... "executions"? Who's going to cut someone's dick off, or slit someone's throat, or beat someone to death with a weight bar? Who's job would this be?
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
I know a few folks who would gladly do the job!!!!!!
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
yes
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
And you think that behaviour is healthy for anyone?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
No, we hope the behavior is fatal for the convict.
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Depends on YOUR definition of healthy.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
I was asking you a question. Do you think it's healthy behaviour for anyone to behave like that? Slashing throats, beating people to death with hammers, cutting off limbs, etc...
There are myriad ways to accomplish that goal. If you don't think that type of behaviour is healthy for anyone (as you stated), and you have the option of avoiding that behaviour, why wouldn't you avoid that behaviour?
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
I think that people who want to do it especially minorities should be able to be employed because that's what they are good at. I'd even support a tax on the top 25% of earners in our society to pay for it.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
I find it humorous that you think people with murderous intent should be employed to kill people who acted on their murderous intent and got caught.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
we have an amendment about that type of thing.
i know you racist rednecks only ever consider the second, but i assure you, there are other amendments.
