Humane Execution

What is the best way to kill criminals?


  • Total voters
    25
Agreed, killing a grown man you actively catch in the process of raping your 7 year old is not only justified, I'd have to question any man who didn't do so.

I would of gave the guy my thanks, that would be a case where the death penalty would be a good thing.

My main problem with capital punishment is how it can be used as a bargening chip by the prosecution.
 
I would of gave the guy my thanks, that would be a case where the death penalty would be a good thing.

My main problem with capital punishment is how it can be used as a bargening chip by the prosecution.
The prosecution. ..

lawyers trying desperately to get better jobs.

More concerned with getting convictions instead of convicting someone of crimes they actually committed.

The prosecution routinely adds charges they know are not applicable so that they can make the defendant feel they have gotten a good deal by their removal.

Prosecutors are the most evil part of our justice system .
 
he was innocent of murder. The one that pulled the trigger did not get the death sentence, because they thought he was innocent of murder until he confessed. Are you really that naive to think that someone innocent of the crime accused were actually innocent. poor dear. Santa Claus lives with the Easter Bunny and Jesus loves you.
You keep insisting that your opinion supersedes the law. It doesn't. Anyone committing a felony in which a person dies has committed murder under the law. The actual trigger man was guilty of murder also, he just plea bargained. Are you really so arrogant to think your opinion overrules the law?
 
So, because one person is an asshole, everyone should be an asshole? We're talking about executing someone, there's no reason to torture them too.
I can think of several. How else you going to stretch out an execution to fill out a half-hour TV time slot?
 
The prosecution. ..

lawyers trying desperately to get better jobs.

More concerned with getting convictions instead of convicting someone of crimes they actually committed.

The prosecution routinely adds charges they know are not applicable so that they can make the defendant feel they have gotten a good deal by their removal.

Prosecutors are the most evil part of our justice system .

Sadly you are correct, the majority seem to think that way. When I investigated and pushed for the death penalty of two local men here I had to prove with overwhelming evidence on why the death penalty was justified for the nature of the crime. We were given the go ahead after many reports given to the attourney general.

He gave direction that we must only seek the death penalty, we could not accept a plea bargin for a lesser sentance.
 
Here's one where the killer is eligible for parole but not his buddy....he's been executed.

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/those-executed-who-did-not-directly-kill-victim

Doyle Skillern TX White 1/16/1985 Accomplice in the murder of an undercover narcotics agent. He was waiting in a car nearby when the murder happened. The shooter is serving a life sentence, but eligible for parole. ("Killers' Fates Diverged; Accomplice Is Executed; Triggerman Faces Parole," Washington Post, January 16, 1985).
 
You keep insisting that your opinion supersedes the law. It doesn't. Anyone committing a felony in which a person dies has committed murder under the law. The actual trigger man was guilty of murder also, he just plea bargained. Are you really so arrogant to think your opinion overrules the law?
Actually the gunman lied..stating he was not the gunman, thus resulting in him not getting the death chair.
 
Actually the gunman lied..stating he was not the gunman, thus resulting in him not getting the death chair.
Doesn't matter whether he was the gunman or not. He was still a participant in murder. You don't seem to get the idea of a felony murder charge. Or think your opinion supersedes the law.
 
same challenge to you as everyone else who answered yes: go be that wrongfully executed person.

in your case though, it;'s probably merited after what you did to your family. twice.
I recently saw a report or article on this very issue.

Prior to DNA testing, and then the achievement of that test, the error rate for death row was found to be 4%.

I'm not saying that makes it ok. But that was rather low, and the onset of DNA testing greatly reduces this number. But obviously there are no hard and fast statistics of innocent persons on death row, if we knew, they would be released.

The true tragedy is actually states that don't have the death penalty. Much more scrutiny is given to a situation where someone is going to be executed.

If you asked me, having spent 5 days in jail once, a life time of incarceration is not something I could say is greatly preferable to death.
 
What about people who get away with murder? Don't hear much complaining about that one.

oj-simpson-smiling-murder-trial.jpg
 
Back
Top