How To Spot A Liberal....

doobnVA

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Can someone please point me to the page in the handbook where it says "liberals" support big government? The idea of government intervention does not automatically equal a desire for a larger body of government.

I mean, come on, CrackerJax, you're just making up your own definition because you're determined to hate "liberals". Seems to me you can make that label fit just about anyone who doesn't agree with your political views.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
Is that what they mean when they say "big government" -- the actual physical size? I thought it was referring to the ever expanding power of the government.

SEE! I get confused :sad:
 
doobnVA

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
Now here is a twist..... I'm all for pulling back access to the voting booth.

This idea that the country is better off if everyone votes is nonsense. People who haven't a clue are herded up in buses and taken to vote on things they don't bother to study or be informed on. They simply vote the way they are told to by whoever is doing the herding.

Voting should take effort.....I wouldn't let ANY organization round up voters. It's completely up to the individual to get there. Then at least most of the voters would be the informed ones and might actually understand what is at stake.

Obama would not be in DC spending the USA's future away. I'd say Bush too, but both Gore and Kerry were horrid choices....perhaps it would have been Ron Pauls best chance.
Click to expand...

I've got to agree with you here. I think in order to register as a voter, you have to pass some sort of intelligence test first.

It's a statistical no-brainer, really. Lots of people collectively making a really stupid decision doesn't miraculously negate the stupidity of it. The more people you have, the more likely it is that one or more of them are completely brainless.
 
doobnVA

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
Is that what they mean when they say "big government" -- the actual physical size? I thought it was referring to the ever expanding power of the government.

SEE! I get confused :sad:
Click to expand...
Well, it could be either I guess. Still, nobody in their right mind would want to give the government MORE power, "liberal" or not.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
doobnVA said:
Can someone please point me to the page in the handbook where it says "liberals" support big government? The idea of government intervention does not automatically equal a desire for a larger body of government.

I mean, come on, CrackerJax, you're just making up your own definition because you're determined to hate "liberals". Seems to me you can make that label fit just about anyone who doesn't agree with your political views.
Click to expand...
One need only look at the goals of liberals Doob..... Govt. Health care programs, Govt. Welfare programs. It takes a BIG BIG govt. to do all of these things. The govt. matches the goals.

Look at LBJ'S great society....... woah....now that is BIG govt. and one of the reasons why everything is a mess today.

Lib's would rather the govt. do the heavy lifting instead of the private sector. That takes a big govt.


WIKI....it ends up being both big and powerful and as you can see....they always want more.....always.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
More and more...yes. Don't worry though, the Chinese will eventually show up and show us all what order really means....:wink:
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
doobnVA said:
I've got to agree with you here. I think in order to register as a voter, you have to pass some sort of intelligence test first.

It's a statistical no-brainer, really. Lots of people collectively making a really stupid decision doesn't miraculously negate the stupidity of it. The more people you have, the more likely it is that one or more of them are completely brainless.
Click to expand...
WOW.... there was a time when everyone could not vote and I hope we never go back to that time..Who would make the intelligence test up ???? No way even if I have to deal with retarded people like the ones busting up the town hall meetings voting I will always fight for EVERYONE to vote....I just will work harder to make sure I inform people about whats going on....
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
You can't really blame the stupid people, I mean, they're just what the government wants them to be, aren't they? If the government wanted smarter citizens we'd have a better education system.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Unions control the schools, dem's control the unions. It is no surprise that publik skool kids graduate without a shred of real economic knowledge.
 
NewGrowth

NewGrowth

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
Isn't that the first step in controlling people? Controlling their education.
Click to expand...
Obviously and it seems to have worked really well so far . . .

The propaganda machine is another method and it is so huge now days that even people who think they are "fighting the power" are just unwitting puppets of the left/right, blue/red bullshit show.
 
S

snail240

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
More and more...yes. Don't worry though, the Chinese will eventually show up and show us all what order really means....:wink:
Click to expand...
Oh I do love chinese food though. I mean could you imagine if China owned us.........................Bwahahahaaha better China then Britain I say I mean if Britain owned us then what would all them wars get us? Shit China owns us now and we where at war with them.

This country was ass crackers or backwords? when it was created by slave owners might I say to control the rest of the population by rules a guide lines. READ the constitution it does nothing to protect you from anything not government not shit. It doesnt even protect from rape or banks robbing you it protects them.

The constition gives government power it shouldnt have to begin with its putting regulations on its self it makes no sence and we have no say because we didnt wright or sign the constition you see?

Our republic was lost when the constitution was wrote because WE still have no right to consent or change it without the elites aproval. Elite being federal government. States can regulate them selves think of us as countrys we are allready a north american union wake up damn.

Politics are stupid its like pro wrestling whos obama gonna power bomb next?
 
t@intshredder

t@intshredder

Well-Known Member
snail240 said:
Oh I do love chinese food though. I mean could you imagine if China owned us.........................Bwahahahaaha better China then Britain I say I mean if Britain owned us then what would all them wars get us? Shit China owns us now and we where at war with them.

This country was ass crackers or backwords? when it was created by slave owners might I say to control the rest of the population by rules a guide lines. READ the constitution it does nothing to protect you from anything not government not shit. It doesnt even protect from rape or banks robbing you it protects them.

The constition gives government power it shouldnt have to begin with its putting regulations on its self it makes no sence and we have no say because we didnt wright or sign the constition you see?

Our republic was lost when the constitution was wrote because WE still have no right to consent or change it without the elites aproval. Elite being federal government. States can regulate them selves think of us as countrys we are allready a north american union wake up damn.

Politics are stupid its like pro wrestling whos obama gonna power bomb next?
Click to expand...
Huh? :lol: When has the US ever been involved in a war against China?
I thought "they" were supposed to close this forum. I hope they don't so we can all continue reading the comedy. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top