I have grown for about the last 5 years under led, so would say I have experience growing under led. I also have used hps, lec and various halides.
Here's what I think about this 50% more efficient. People imagine their full room of donkey dick buds under there 600w hps, then try and imagine half more buds again. Those people will struggle to see how led is better than hps as that will seem like bullshit! Then you get people that digest the concept of using leds slightly different from than others
It can do the same donkey dick grow, but with about 50% less electric being used.
Btw 50% less must be a grower with the best cobs totally dialled in with their shit together big time! 50% is ambitious imo, especially looking at matey's gavita grow. Pukka grow btw!
I have mental health problems and am going back to 100% led to increase my general health and well being. With hps, I hate the heat, I hate the loud fans, I hate the extra anxiety of there being increased fire risks. I also hate the dry look the leaves gets coz the extraction is on so much, the humidity gets sucked out of there too fast and it lowers the rh too much.
Don't forget, especially for you guys and girls in the USA. Some of you have ditched air con during the switch... Now there's some savings for you that will piss on the 50% figures. Switching off a 2kw air conditioner and a 1000w hps to plug in 600w of cob
Then there is the quality, led grows great bud, like cmh/lec does, hps, even dual spec is good weed, but lacking in the potency that a full spectrum white light gives it. Many growers switch from hps to metal halide for the last few weeks to increase quality. That says it all.
I find led buds are smaller, but more dense. So you grow more tops, veg out 50% tops if you switch to 100% led.