Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Not to mention that if Mexico's economy is in the crapper..you think you got an illegal immigration problem now? It would double or triple with a worse economy.
Exactly. Hordes of hungry people south of our border is not the answer to illegal immigration.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Exactly. Hordes of hungry people south of our border is not the answer to illegal immigration.


Yeah.. Agreed, I've been saying for years( and I'm a dumbass) the 2 most important foreign relations we have are Canada n Mexico.. Russia n China n England round out top 5... Everyone else can eat a dick.. Fuck giving Isreal or Egypt a dime..let alone billions.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
1. Sanders has a net worth of $700K - hardly "poor"
2. Personal net worth isn't a reliable indicator of a presidential term. For example, Lincoln was one of the poorest presidents to hold office but regularly tops the list of most successful presidents in American history. Likewise, W. Bush, Nixon, Harding, Buchannan, Polk, Taft & others were all wealthy men with much higher personal net worths who had largely forgettable (aside from W.s catastrophe) terms as president

People support Sanders because his policy positions help the poor and middle-class at a time when the only section of American society that has economically prospered as a whole for the past 40 years is the upper-class
Sanders has a negative net worth. He lived off welfare and writing cheap porn until he went into politics. He has 65k in credit card debt.He lived in a car most of his life. You're making up Bernie's history. Your idol FDR, was filthy rich
 
  • Like
Reactions: TWS

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Didn't say it was our job. Just saying that wrecking Mexico's economy isn't much of a solution to anything. The assumption is that we feel a strong need to stop illegal immigration. Creating more Mexican unemployed is a pretty idiotic way to start off that initiative. I am suggesting that if the Mexican worker had good jobs in Mexico, we wouldn't have nearly as many people taking the risk to cross that border. And yeah, I'm also saying that the Mexican worker has more in common with the US worker than either have with their wealthy class.

Make America Great Again by impoverishing our neighbor sounds like something that 1% would want.
Creating more Mexican unemployed? How about holding their own country accountable, not ours.
The best way to get illegals to go back home and stop crossing the border is to elect Trump president. Self deportation will happen immediately. Then the magnets that attract illegals to our country will be eliminated. Millions more will migrate back across the border.

If you want to help Mexico, I think that's great, help them. But it's not the president's job to look out for working conditions and fair wages in Mexico. If that's what people want to do, then running for political office is not where they belong.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
If you think bernie even has a chance your dead wrong if Nevada was any indication of what soon to be Bernies demise iowa he lost if i am not mistaken newhampsire is only place he won haha but lets look closer and what is a no brainer even for bernie he knows he lost

Sanders has yet to demonstrate strength in a state whose electorate isn’t more than 90 percent white. Nevada and South Carolina, the next contests, don’t look anything like Iowa or New Hampshire. Only 65 percent of voters were white in the 2008 Democratic caucus in Nevada, and only 43 percent were in South Carolina.

Polling has indicated that Sanders trails among nonwhite voters by nearly40 percentage points nationally. Although no reliable recent polling is available in Nevada, Clinton leads by 30 percentage points in both of ourSouth Carolina forecasts. In the latest Marist College poll, she’s buoyed by a 74 percent to 17 percent lead among black voters. Sanders must cut into that margin if he wants to have any chance in South Carolina or anywhere in the South.

You could already see how Sanders might have problems in Nevada and South Carolina even as he was crushing Clinton in New Hampshire. Despite winning the state by more than 20 percentage points, the best Sanders could manage among registered Democrats was a tie. His large margin came from registered independents who voted in the Democratic primary. You must be a registered Democrat to vote in the Nevada caucuses, though you can register as one the day of the election. In 2008, 81 percent of Nevada caucus-goers self-identified as Democrats. Just 58 percent of New Hampshire voters on Tuesday thought of themselves as Democrats.

Most worrisome for Sanders is his 25-percentage-point loss among New Hampshire Democrats who want to continue President Obama’s policies. Obama’s current job approval rating among blacks nationally is about 90 percent. Sanders will have big problems in South Carolina if he doesn’t do better among voters who like Obama.

So the terrain ahead is friendlier for Clinton; here’s the FiveThirtyEight weighted polling average in upcoming contests (keep in mind, these averages don’t factor in any post-New Hampshire bump that Sanders might get):

DATE STATE CLINTON SANDERS
2/20 Nevada 50.3 28.1
2/27 South Carolina 60.5 29.3
3/8 Michigan 59.9 29.0
3/15 Florida 61.0 26.0
3/15 North Carolina 55.9 28.3
3/15 Ohio 52.8 38.6
4/5 Wisconsin 45.6 43.4
4/26 Pennsylvania 51.4 28.0
6/7 California 46.3 32.9
FiveThirtyEight polling averages as of Feb. 9
The bottom line is that Sanders did very well in New Hampshire, and we can see the outlines of a campaign that can be competitive in the rest of the country. But there is plenty of work for him to do as we move away from the very white states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

So polls are showing him behind in every on oh boy oh boy your not going to win a presidency from voters locally now are you and looking at stats appears he is behind in all other states but hey lets wait n see the next one ok
I think you are mistaken in your belief that voters will decide the nomination, but not that Clinton will win. The "super delegates" are all for Clinton. The nominations are rigged
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
How come trump hasn't disclosed his tax returns?.....what's he trying to hide?.....I don't think he's as rich as he makes out, & he pays 0.00 taxes.....
He already said he will release his taxes. You're just going to have to wait until the documents are ready. Trump doesn't file the 1040EZ form for like you do. His taxes are a little bit more complex
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
How come trump hasn't disclosed his tax returns?.....what's he trying to hide?.....I don't think he's as rich as he makes out, & he pays 0.00 taxes.....


He's worth 4.1 billion..claims 12 billion.. I bet his dick is 3" and claims 9" ..



I'm more interested in the Goldman Sachs speech transcripts from Hillary n her medical history..I think she stroked out last year.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Creating more Mexican unemployed? How about holding their own country accountable, not ours.
The best way to get illegals to go back home and stop crossing the border is to elect Trump president. Self deportation will happen immediately. Then the magnets that attract illegals to our country will be eliminated. Millions more will migrate back across the border.

If you want to help Mexico, I think that's great, help them. But it's not the president's job to look out for working conditions and fair wages in Mexico. If that's what people want to do, then running for political office is not where they belong.
This isn't a morality play here. It's just plain logic. Destabilize Mexico's economy and there will be more people looking to cross the border. What a idiotic way to begin an initiative to stem illegal immigration across our southern border.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
The further this goes the more I'm convinced this whole thing is a Clinton/Trump conspiracy......I swear Bill put him up to it.....you watch & see:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top