oceanbastard
Member
Not entirely sure this is the most appropriate place for this topic but 'eeeere we go.
I recently received a letter from US Customs & Border Protection regarding a shipment of about 500 etizolam pills. The letter claims my package was subject to forfeiture under the following:
Title 19, Section 1595a(c)
Title 21, Section 381
Title 21, Section 331 (a) & (b)
My question is, how much of a chance do I have to see the return of my package should I elect to petition, and what is the best way of doing so? Under Title 19, Section 1595a(c) and Title 21, Section 331 (a) & (b) i have erred in no way. The substance in question is NOT contrary to law, with the exception of Arkansas and Mississippi where scheduling acts have not fully taken effect and were not even passed at the ACTUAL time of importation (exact date unknown but could be retrieved, sometime in first quarter of the year (this also brings me to ask if I can refute their claimed date of seizure which is clearly incorrect - september 25, 2014)). In addition, the product is in no way adulterated or misbranded - having ordered from this retailer before, I know for certain that all products in my package, if left alone with no tampering, are CLEARLY labeled as what they are, their dosage, and their chemical makeup. My primary concern is that there is some gray area in the wording of title 21, Section 381 that could null my petition entirely.
Any help is greatly appreciated, as unfortunately, this package does not ACTUALLY belong to me, but it has fallen to me to undertake retrieving it if this is possible.
I recently received a letter from US Customs & Border Protection regarding a shipment of about 500 etizolam pills. The letter claims my package was subject to forfeiture under the following:
Title 19, Section 1595a(c)
Title 21, Section 381
Title 21, Section 331 (a) & (b)
My question is, how much of a chance do I have to see the return of my package should I elect to petition, and what is the best way of doing so? Under Title 19, Section 1595a(c) and Title 21, Section 331 (a) & (b) i have erred in no way. The substance in question is NOT contrary to law, with the exception of Arkansas and Mississippi where scheduling acts have not fully taken effect and were not even passed at the ACTUAL time of importation (exact date unknown but could be retrieved, sometime in first quarter of the year (this also brings me to ask if I can refute their claimed date of seizure which is clearly incorrect - september 25, 2014)). In addition, the product is in no way adulterated or misbranded - having ordered from this retailer before, I know for certain that all products in my package, if left alone with no tampering, are CLEARLY labeled as what they are, their dosage, and their chemical makeup. My primary concern is that there is some gray area in the wording of title 21, Section 381 that could null my petition entirely.
Any help is greatly appreciated, as unfortunately, this package does not ACTUALLY belong to me, but it has fallen to me to undertake retrieving it if this is possible.