hyroot
Well-Known Member
Responding, primary to your post #40but in fact, all of your queries. Here's my analogy...
I have many years experience with hi-end audio. Sony's BIG lie when they introduced digital (CD players) was Perfect Sound Forever, but it never sounded as good as analogue. Decades of R & D have gone into resolving digital's inherent problem: It chops up the sign wave, making it look more like steps. Digital converters attempt to fill in the missing information. People spend BIG $$$ on exotic converters to solve this.
I look at bi-wave spectrum fixtures (R/B) as light spectrums version of digital. All spectrums are needed, it just a question of how much of each.
Tape convolutions work.for giving it that tape sound. .wav is linear. Its not chopped up at all. of you see breaks outside a bar in .wav file. Its bemm penciled in from a punch in or the lower frequencies were brougt up to match the higher frequencies. Thats known as munson.effect or loud button. Tape was better sound due to the warmth in sound. But cd was more cost effective. Like beta and vhs. Mp3 are basically bit crushed and chopped. . Wav is 16 bit 44,100 hurtz , mp3 is 8 bit 22,100 hurtz. The good things about mp3 is if sampling you can get some grimey drums from it. The a/d coneverters is part of the engine in e-mu cards and digidesign hardware. Ive been an audio engineer for a decade. I make beats too. The steps are bars and measures to read musice and count melodic steps.That was created before electricity.