Search results

Crohnes disease is one of them, IIRC, not sure about others...

Yes, a liberal democrat serving a liberal democrat president and a liberal democrat majority congress. Even when the MTA was overturned it was democrat congress that passed the CSA. Nixon signed it but they had a supermajoirty so a veto wouldn't have helped. Not that Nixon was pro-mj either.

I've heard that joke for years but I never thought I'd get a chance to use it in forums. I had to... :D

No, I smoke medical marijuana and it was bigot liberals that made it illegal.

To make sure that man/wife are not related...to prevent "flipper babies." Quit pretending that somebody would want to marry you. :D

If you and your wife get divorced will you still be cousins? (couldn't resist) ;)

Yes. Liberalism is a mental disorder, socialism and communism are symptoms... :D

Right now federal law (DOMA) supports traditional marriage and the SCOTUS will be deciding the states right/14th arguments. I hope that it's decided soon but it may not make it before the election...

Because he's a social liberal...

A blood test is required in most, if not all, states to get a marriage licence.

I've already explained to you mental midgets that a gay man has the EXACT same right to marry a woman as a straight man does. That's equal. If people said that a gay man couldn;t marry a woman becasue he's gay that would be discrimibnation. Stop trying to use "Liberace" logic. (see how stupid...

It's wrong because a gay man doesn't have to pretend to be straight to marry a woman. They just have to be willing and pass a blood test.

Calling it inequality doesn't make it so. Marriage is between a man and a woman therefore it's equal if a gay man can marry a woman like a straight man can. It's true that gay couples should be able to get the same societal benefits as married couples therefore civil unions would provide that...

That was stupid and wrong that last time you tried that too..

Love isn't a requirement for marriage. It's a good idea but not a requirement based on results.

Redefining would make special rights not equal rights.

Gay men can marry women just like straight men can. Equal. :D

The whole idea of civil unions is to get the same benefits without redefining marriage. That's how. :D Would you feel better (or special) if only gays could get civil unions?

So much for your claim of logic...

It has nothing to do with fear nor would redefining marriage "protect" anyone.