tea party much?
Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims],and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
From the treaty of Tripoli
passed unanimously by congress on June 7, 1797
uhh huh, yes, jefferson made clear that unlike other "Christian Nations" of the time, we had no intention of "Christianizing" any musselmen, not reshaping their nation in a christian mould, a STATED AIM of most of the european colonial powers.
this however does not infer that the caliphate of morrocco (the other side of the treaty which was shortly broken, AGAIN) was in any wise NOT a mohammedan nation, or in any way not a theocracy.
this treaty promises that america has no dreams of empire, a sentiment found among all the republicans (note the small R) of the day.
in expectation of your reference to "manifest destiny" broken treaties with the aboriginal peoples, annexation of hawaii, eager and careless fumbling with the internal affairs of foreign nations like a teenager finally getting to third base, and eventually
Team America World Police, bear in mind Jefferson was a republican, not a member of the Republican Party, and all that shit came later, when the constitution became a "living document" whose words could be twisted into any form desired.
that treaty, and it's language do not imply that america was not a majority christian nation, nor that it's founding documents drew heavily on the moral and religious beliefs of the men who wrote it, but rather that the US is not an EVANGELICAL nation with dreams of hegemony (at that time).
tghis document has been thrown out by lefties so often it ALMOST seems to mean what they wish it to mean.
what purpose it serves in this bullshit ad hominem attack (which includes the prohibited "translating" of another's words though fraudulent edited quotes) is beyond me, as the thrust of your attack seems to be a simple "That's Racist!!"