riiiight.
you need a few more semesters of into to psychology sam.
choosing a side is natural. i chose the side in the israeli/palestinian fight that i would prefer to live with, the side that has lied and prevaricated LESS, and the side with LESS blood on it's hands. and thats the israelis.
im always on the side of personal liberty, the side that says what's mine is mine, and what's yours is yours. self defense is a natural and irrevocable right of all, and "if they dont start nothin, it wont be nothin" is my creedo. i pick my side for reasons which are my own, but always consistent. deals are sacred, lies are inexcusable, and fake evidence poisons the entire argument. thats just how i roll.
four20swg prefers to stand off on the edge and call both sides assholes for not being as "unbaised" and "post modern" as himself. this entire thread is his forum for displaying his awesome skill at NOT taking a side and instead declaring oneself above it all, superior to those who choose a side, and so magnificently caring and magnanimous that he can empathize completely with every position. he is the most sensitive and empathetic person in the universe, especially when he is making specious arguments on behalf of NOTHING and hurling ad hominems at all who pass too close to his private pseudo-intellectual monkey cage.
abandon prefers the underdog, so he presumes and assumes hamas is the victim of israeli aggression, since that fits his narrative.
Smok3y is a doctrinaire moslem so in any conflict, the moslem is always blameless and perfect, and their opponents consort with djinn.
uncle buck of course prefers to wade in with whichever side is the most liberal/progressive
and red 1966 gets all his opinions from the good people at stormfront
you, youre a mystery. a riddle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in an ez-wider. i never know where youll weigh in. i like the way you keep it fresh, and just a little schizophrenic. stay crazy my friend.