There is No saving P Ryan

spandy

Well-Known Member
That's funny.


I have a close friend that had 3 abortions and has 3 children - it isn't all or nothing Spandy. Now what would you say to this woman? That she should have had 6 kids?
She does have 6 children....sadly she had 3 of them killed.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
She does have 6 children....sadly she had 3 of them killed.
i would say she only has three children. the other three fetuses were aborted being the part you are missing.

did you survive your abortion or something? is that why you are such a gaylord about calling people murderers?
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
She does have 6 children....sadly she had 3 of them killed.

again, what would you say to her, not me - she does not "have" 6, she has three. They are doing quite well, all of them are going to college and are bright and able. Had they had the 6 they most likely would have required government assistance.
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
again, what would you say to her, not me - she does not "have" 6, she has three. They are doing quite well, all of them are going to college and are bright and able. Had they had the 6 they most likely would have required government assistance.
Why would what I say to you be any different than what I would say to her?

Just because 3 turned out okay doens't justify the fact that the other 3 are dead.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Why would what I say to you be any different than what I would say to her?

Just because 3 turned out okay doens't justify the fact that the other 3 are dead.


Actually it does. So is that mother a murderer? And you would have no problem with her going on public assistance to support her 6 children?
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
Actually it does. So is that mother a murderer? And you would have no problem with her going on public assistance to support her 6 children?
By definition of law she is not a murderer. Nonetheless she ordered three innocent lives to be destroyed.

If welfare wasn't so "comfortable" and killing innocent lives, born or unborn, was illegal, many less people like your friend would make babies they couldnt take care of because they wouldn't have anything to gain from it.
 

dtp5150

Well-Known Member
spandy, i am impressed. i dont know u but im impressed by the few comments ive read that u made. right on dude.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
By definition of law she is not a murderer. Nonetheless she ordered three innocent lives to be destroyed.

If welfare wasn't so "comfortable" and killing innocent lives, born or unborn, was illegal, many less people like your friend would make babies they couldnt take care of because they wouldn't have anything to gain from it.
Are you actually suggesting that a restriction upon abortion would lead to fewer initiated pregnancies? People will still **** just as much as before. cn
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
cannabinner when will you realilse u should shut the fuck up and learn
Stripping the insult aside, your post makes no sense. I am always interested in learning. Do you have anything to teach? The posts of yours that i have seen tend to extreme surliness. I am thinking that you're lauding Spandy not for reason, but for a shared ideology. cn
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Post edited ... looks like a mod did some clean-up. Thank you ... although I didn't find dtp's posts to be unusual for the often-contentious tenor of this forum ... cn
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Actually it does. So is that mother a murderer? And you would have no problem with her going on public assistance to support her 6 children?
She's a murderer. I have no problem with her going on assistance. If the shit really hits the fan, we can stop spending $700 billion on blowing up children and feed them instead.
 
Top