PROOF That Ron Paul is a RACIST!!!

PushForKush

Active Member
Look here and find all your proof!


~ http://www.dynw.com/ronpaulisracist/






but in all seriousness, anybody who thinks he's racist is just (really wanna say it, so sorry if it offends any of you) FUCKING RETARDED!


The guy never loses a debate, always shows respect (never bashes anyone), he's completely honest and frankly is better than any other candidate.

Plus, he IS Freedom!! AND THAT'S WHAT WE NEED! DON'T BE STUPID!!!


To watch him respectfully win debate after debate after debate, just search 'Ron Paul Owns' in the youtube search to see results like, "Ron Paul Owns ______ (person that Ron Paul owns in a debate.)"

Just makin' it simple 'cause if you're not voting for him, you must be THAT stupid.


"If you voted for Obama to prove you're not racist, then vote for Ron Paul to prove you're not an idiot." - QFT
 

GodSlave

Active Member
I''m a RP guy all the way, have been since before the last elections, I voted for him in the last primaries. But, with that said, RP is not going to get the nomination. I wish it was true, and I hope I am wrong, but I don't think so. I had my hopes up, and I really thought it might come true early on when he surged in the polls and took 3rd, but since then, it's been down hill.
I still support RP, but Cain is my new guy now. Just my .02
Peace Out,
GS:leaf:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i know you've heard of the politics section, i've seen you over there before. why not put the 3,542,427th thread about ron paul over there?

and care to explain why his racist newsletter was not only written in the first person, but that he also defended it before changing his story and claiming that he did not write nor read his very own newsletter? care to explain that about face?
 

smokebros

Well-Known Member
i know you've heard of the politics section, i've seen you over there before. why not put the 3,542,427th thread about ron paul over there?

and care to explain why his racist newsletter was not only written in the first person, but that he also defended it before changing his story and claiming that he did not write nor read his very own newsletter? care to explain that about face?
Care to verify that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Care to verify that?
all you have to do is google it.

it came up during his 1996 campaign, the houston chronicle reported on it, i have only posted it a million times.

http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1996_1343749

Houston Chronicle said:
Paul, a Republican obstetrician from Surfside, said Wednesday he opposes racism and that his written commentaries about blacks came in the context of ""current events and statistical reports of the time."
key words? "paul...said...HIS written commentaries".

when it came up again in 2008 he tried to say he never wrote or even read them. too bad we have documented evidence to the contrary, you old turtle fucker (ron paul).

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Can't be done... as it's a lie.


The colors duke, the colors!
the evidence is archived and i have posted that.

the internet never forgets.

"paul...said....his written commentaries..."

that means he is defending them as HIS writings.

facts are such tough things.
 

GodSlave

Active Member
should i also get into how ron paul wants to abolish all public schools?
Yeah, and let the ones do it who can do the job right, the private sector, because in case you haven't noticed, the public sector ain't doing so good running the school system...
 

SocataSmoker

Well-Known Member
Thanks for finding that article... was an interesting read.

Regardless, whether he was racist or not... he doesn't exhibit any racist tendencies now and every time I've seen him interact with a different race it has always been very positive.

He came to Baton Rouge a few weeks back and I caught him at LSU talking... there were many, many non-Caucasian races there supporting him, talking and engaging with him after the speech on many subjects that were important to their races, and not a single person I saw was disappointed by what he had to tell them.


As for abolishing public schools, I think you have that confused... he want to eliminate the Dept. of Education, which I agree is a terribly run department of this government, and give states, local communities, and parents more control over how their children are taught.

“First, the Constitution does not authorize the Department of Education, and the founders never envisioned the federal government dictating those education policies.

Second, it is a huge bureaucracy that squanders our money. We send billions of dollars to Washington and get back less than we sent. The money would be much better off left in states and local communities rather than being squandered in Washington.

Finally, I think that the smallest level of government possible best performs education. Teachers, parents, and local community leaders should be making decisions about exactly how our children should be taught, not Washington bureaucrats.

The Department of Education has given us No Child Left Behind, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the hands of the people.”
 

GodSlave

Active Member
Actually, I think ALL the republican candidates have something good to say... anyone but king moron.

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
As for abolishing public schools, I think you have that confused... he want to eliminate the Dept. of Education, which I agree is a terribly run department of this government, and give states, local communities, and parents more control over how their children are taught.
no, he is on tape saying that he wants to "privatize all schools", which is no different than abolishing public schools entirely.

[video=youtube;z-EAYncCRok]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z-EAYncCRok[/video]

0:38 ---> "of course, we want to go in the direction of privatizing all schools"

again, the internet never forgets, even though that codgy old turtle fucker wants to.
 

SocataSmoker

Well-Known Member
no, he is on tape saying that he wants to "privatize all schools", which is no different than abolishing public schools entirely.

[video=youtube;z-EAYncCRok]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z-EAYncCRok[/video]

0:38 ---> "of course, we want to go in the direction of privatizing all schools"

again, the internet never forgets, even though that codgy old turtle fucker wants to.


Listen to the whole thing... I agree with every word he said.


If I am able to, I will certainly send my kids to private schools... however I'll probably end up home schooling my kids as I plan on raising them far from any city.


The system we have now does not work, so it's time to start changing it... as he said it won't happen tomorrow, but over the course of many years I think we could revamp our K-12 schools in to something MUCH better than they are today.
 
Top