Illumination
New Member
You are not smoking your Daddy's cannabis... weed of the 60's doesn't even compare with weed today, we are told that time and time again in the media. With all of the genetics and crossing that have been done to tweak strains, I don't think the weed of the 60's and 70's can touch the buzz of 2010's... I can go Google and paste studies and other data, but I'm not about paste pages and pages of data, as it will only encourage further pasting. This argument has a taken a thread about Nirvana and totally took it off topic.
Express, nice try, but you are going to type til you are blue in the face. You stated a page ago that BT gave up..... I lol'ed at your naivety. BT don't give up, he drones on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on until others give up... Don't you realize EVERY conversation BT gets into here has to be a competition in his mind. He'll keep at it until you are both told to knock it off or until you quit. I really believe he gets self satisfaction out of the confrontations he finds himself in on this board.
This is so and as such I will re-iterate that Nirvana will never get another nickel from me for their crap....not saying anything other than personal experience...too many real good genetics out there to waste time and money on bs that has shown itself to me to be crap Wally World beans
Namaste'