The Ruiner
Well-Known Member
I was wondering when you would show up...full of piss and vinegar.fail right from the get go.
there is no possible overlap. there is 5x5 for recreational, and different limits for medical (and certainly not 'howver much they want'...normally there is a limit like 10 veg and 10 bud, or upto 99 veg and 99 bud).
the only real question you ask is 'will people still b able to get doctor recs?'...which we have shown you over and over again, the answer is YES.
i don't live there, not sure how this works now, but pretty sure it is already happening. under prop 19, this may still occur. but if you want to get in on the commercial cultivation rather than medical, you need to follow the dictates of sectioons 11300 - 11302.
see, this is exactly why i didn't waste my time previously responding to your hypothetical malarky - LOADED QUESTIONS and FALSE PRESUPPOSITIONS. the new legislation is for recreational and commercial cannabis, not medical cannabis.
another loaded question/false presupposition. you are assuming here that this was written solely to benefit the state of california. i would argue that is largely an afterthought, just a clever way to get more people to sign the petition and vote for it.
boy, it seems you can't even ask a question that is not loaded. here you assume that the commercial market will be so bogged down with regulations and taxes that it won't be able to compete with th medical market. that, m friend, is yet another false presupposition. are you forgetting that it costs money and plenty of time to keep a medical card current and up to date? or are you just ignoring? and have you stopped beating your wife?
yet another loaded question! who says commercial will have such elevated overhead that will spell higher prices? why should i even bother responding? have you rubbed the sand out of your vagina yet? (<---see, i can ask loaded questions, too!)
what else do you want me to say? we have already shown you it is true that 215 will be left intact.
now take your loaded questions and false presuppositions and go somewhere else with them. since this thing is about 95% assured of passing based on polling data and trends, it might be wise for you to use your time towards more fruitful pursuits.
Buck, your unwillingness to even consider the questions is depressing. Of course they are loaded...they are hypotheticals. I can only use what is known about the current system and what is being proposed in 19 - I didnt think it too much of a stretch considering the situation I put forth is the one the state will have to deal with if 19 passes, it may not be exact, but I am at least trying to see how this would work.
You however make no such effort and I will make none with you.