The Ruiners' Hypothetical Questions to 19 Supporters

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
Glad you could contribute to the debate UB! Way to go!

And it would be cool if you direct your "falsehoods" statement at the person that made them.
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
dude...really? you are that personally driven to attack me as to totally change the direction of your outlashing? Thank you for bringing your sarcasm and general rabble rousing to the thread. Why are you here? Are you posting here to debate the issue or to just irritate people?

And really dude, its just your own skewed intepretation vs mine on that issue, which was the whole reason for this thread. I am trying to get answers here, not assholes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so i am a sarcastic, irrtating, rabble rousing asshole driven to attack you?

kinda sounds like you are attacking me.
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
and post #40 here is sincere and productive to the topic at hand? that is sarcasm. that is rabble rousing.
 

Hayduke

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that the only people against it are the people growing for money..
kinda ironic, wouldnt ya say?
I grow, don't sell and if I could vote know twice I would.

A vote of yes makes me guilty of a felony crime on a near daily basis...thanks Dick.

As long as the Honorable Judge Uncle Buck is interpreting the the wording of Dicks Tricks...we will all be ok:-P

This is the space Dick will let everyone who lives here grow in...you know cuz he wants to legalize marijuana...for you and me!...The great thing is...that when what I can grow runs out...Dick will be there...Thanks Dick.



:leaf::peace::leaf:
 

Attachments

beardo

Well-Known Member
No insults here, just think its ridiculous stoners are against a legalization bill.
Kinda fucked up in my eyes and throughout usa, i say this from personal experience. ;)
You guys are making fools of yoursleves
:clap:
I am very pro legalization and would vote for a bill to legalize marijuana-that is not what prop 19 is.
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
If prop 19 passes what kind of permit will you need to open a marijuana buisness and how much will those permits cost?
 

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
Ruiner, you have been showed multiple times before that 19 has no affect on 215. When the legislation is right in front of you, you ignore it and argue against it. I will show you one more time that you will not be affected.

7. Ensure that if a city decides not to tax and regulate the sale of cannabis, that buying and selling cannabis within that city’s limits remain illegal, but that the city’s citizens still have the right to possess and consume small amounts, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.


8. Ensure that if a city decides it does want to tax and regulate the buying and selling of cannabis (to and from adults only), that a strictly controlled legal system is implemented to oversee and regulate cultivation, distribution, and sales, and that the city will have control over how and how much cannabis can be bought and sold, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
So what (7.) says is that you can't sell or buy in a city that does not tax UNLESS Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you! Don't know what those are? Well, I'm going to pull them up for you, because they do indeed apply to you (you've said you had your 215 so I'm assuming they do)! Also, since 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 are allowed then you can also grow in that city with a doctors recommendation, since it clearly states those rights will not be taken away.
What ( 8. )says is that the city will take over the buying, selling, and growing in large scale, unless 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you!
§11362.5. Use of marijuana for medical purposes.
(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.
(b)(l) The people of the State of California hereby find and declare that the purposes of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 are as follows:
(A) To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.
(B) To ensure that patients and their primary care-givers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.
(C), To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers others, nor to condone the diversion of marijuana for nonmedical purposes.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law: no physician in this state shall be punished, or denied any right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana to a patient for medical purposes.
(d) Section 11357, relating to the possession of marijuana, and Section 11358, relating to the cultivation of marijuana, shall not apply to a patient, or to a patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician.
(e) For the purposes of this section, "primary care-giver" means the individual designated by the person exempted under this section who has consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of that person. (Added by 1996 initiative Measure Prop 215 §1, eff.: 11/6/96.)
I will give you the link for sections 11362.7 through 11362.9 because I don't want to take up a shit ton of room on this board.
For 11362.7 - 11362.83: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=hsc&group=11001-12000&file=11362.7-11362.83
11362.9 is for research purposes, feel free to look it up, but unless you work at a research lab in a UC, it does not apply to you.

It's made pretty clear that medical users will not have their rights stripped. Please read the prop in full, and read 215, you should know your own rights.
 

Brokenneck

Well-Known Member
I love the debate, I like to see it your way and his way.
But it still seems like it is one persons interpretation verses another persons interpretation.
And too often, I see you guys getting mad at each other when we should be sharing and teaching.

Personally I think that the more legal we can make things, the better. Could things be mended in the future? These are not stone tablets are they?

I know someone has a lawyer friend (NON BIASED) that could chime in and read this to us.
I am not saying anyone is uneducated, but a person that recites law in attempt to persuade a judge or court could definitely benefit the entire forum.

The Issue: HUGE
The Stage: California, But yes the World is watching.

Things are going to change.
Respect!
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
Ruiner, you have been showed multiple times before that 19 has no affect on 215. When the legislation is right in front of you, you ignore it and argue against it. I will show you one more time that you will not be affected.

So what (7.) says is that you can't sell or buy in a city that does not tax UNLESS Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you! Don't know what those are? Well, I'm going to pull them up for you, because they do indeed apply to you (you've said you had your 215 so I'm assuming they do)! Also, since 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 are allowed then you can also grow in that city with a doctors recommendation, since it clearly states those rights will not be taken away.
What ( 8. )says is that the city will take over the buying, selling, and growing in large scale, unless 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you!
I will give you the link for sections 11362.7 through 11362.9 because I don't want to take up a shit ton of room on this board.
For 11362.7 - 11362.83: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=hsc&group=11001-12000&file=11362.7-11362.83
11362.9 is for research purposes, feel free to look it up, but unless you work at a research lab in a UC, it does not apply to you.

It's made pretty clear that medical users will not have their rights stripped. Please read the prop in full, and read 215, you should know your own rights.
I would REALLY appreciate it if a 19-supporter could actually address the very first post in this thread...This entire post is based from a perceived notion when in fact my entire premise for asking the original questions was to give you the ENTIRE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT THAT 19 WILL LEAVE 215 INTACT, I want to know HOW this model will work, because even in theory it makes no sense to me. Please actually read what I said in the beginning of this thread!
 

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
I really just don't understand what you're getting at, but I'll try to answer every question that you posted.

Since there is so much debate over the 5x5 and cultivation in general, and the (possible) overlap between that part of the bill and the CUA/MMP, if 19 passes, will people still be able to get doctors rec's and, by what everyone is saying, cultivate however much they want, without restrictions in regards to growing space?
Yes they will, doctor's recs will still be going out; however, not nearly as many people will be getting them, because most people who have gotten a rec in the past (myself included) did not have a very good reason to get one. Other than the fact that I wanted to smoke weed without getting arrested. There are restrictions to growing space, there always has been. In most cases (cities that I have lived in), it's 10 immature plants and 10 mature plants.

Therefore, in order to be part of the action in commerce, ordinary people will simply need to get a doctors rec to grow, and distribute as much as they possibly can to dispensaries and other patients, and quite possibly to the "black market" ?
This already happens, most growers with cards that I know of get the card so they can distribute their buds and make money, not because of some ailment. The limit will still be 99 plants, unless you get the commercial license that will be heavily monitored by the state, eliminating any chance of black market. People disobeying the law now, will disobey it in the future too. The difference, everyone can grow now so the dependency on others for weed is minimal. Why would you buy from a cartel when you can pump out two pounds or more to yourself every 3-4 months. This is actually trying to stop growers from getting their cards just to distribute. 215 has been heavily abused, and can be easily seen in many areas of California.

What would be the point of passing all new legislation that can be so easily cast aside? What good does 19 do the state, if all it takes to avoid what will more than likely be thousands of dollars in taxes annually is a $35 doctors rec? Wouldn't that just be, as supporters of the bill have put it "more of the same"?
19's major purpose is to differentiate between medical and recreational users. It will also make the state shit tons of money to get rid of this terrible deficit that we have. Taxes are going to go up in someway or another. Why not have the price of weed go down, and the taxes on it go up. Once weed becomes legal and readily accessible, then it will be bought very regularly.The price will stay relatively the same, and we won't have to get fucked in the ass by some other taxes that we will need to pay in the future. Also, most dispensaries in my area (San Francisco) are starting to tax as well.

Also, how could the commercial interests backing 19 benefit from making it legal for the entire 21 and over population of the state to possess cannabis if they cant possibly compete with a market that has way more advantages in regards to abundant supply and more relaxed regulations?
I don't exactly know what you're asking. If you're referring to dispensaries vs commercial sale of marijuana, dispensaries are way less relaxed in regards to regulations. And, in a few years (if 19 passes) will have a much much smaller supply. Fact of the matter is, dispensaries will probably still have extremely good bud, but they will most likely only be used by medical patients, which is the way it should be.

On the flip side of this coin, what will be the motivation for the "casual smoker" to patronize the commercial establishments, with their elevated overhead and strict regulatory scrutiny which will more than likely spell higher prices, versus just getting the doctors rec and going medical?
The state is not going to make inconvenient for itself to make money. I agree with you that government does a great job of fucking shit up, but California has realized that it really does need weed to become legal in order to get out of the shits. Government's main motivating factor is money, and if people start getting fucked by publicly buying weed then they will get their cards and we will have the same situation that is already happening with dispensaries now. The government knows this, so it is in their best interest to satisfy the customer. By the time 19 can get out of hand, more props will be passed that make marijuana laws even more relaxed for recreational use. (I think that there is one proposed on the 2012 ballot). Unless you think that our state's deficit will go away in a year because of marijuana, I don't think you need to worry about the government fucking people over. It's not until they no longer need the stoners that they will try to take advantage of them, and by that time, more props will pass giving us the advantage. You can climb any mountain, you just need to take small steps, 215 was the first step, and 19 is the second.

It just doesnt make sense to me that people with millions riding on the passage and eventual commercial sales of MJ to leave a less regulated and more than likely less expensive competitor. It doesnt make sense to make things harder on yourself, and to pay millions of dollars to do it. It just doesn't make sense for 19 to leave 215 intact if EVERYTHING that is being SAID about 215 being left intact is true.
The major investors will probably find ways to make more money then they put in. They see this as an opportunity to gain, so they are willing to support it. I have already showed you that 215 will stay intact, no where in the prop does it say that it won't. The investors are simply trying to make money where they see that they can. Just look at the 60,000 sqft building in Oakland for fuck's sake. If 19 passes they will be beyond rich. I don't see why anyone who had the means to invest in legalizing a substance that is used by almost everyone in California would not.

Hopefully this answered something. 19 is in my best interest because I no longer carry large quantities of weed in public, and I grow for my own personal stash. To do this without paying $50 a year would be very nice for me. If you're in the same boat then 19 is great for you too.
 
Top