This is just round one, wait until things break in Ukraine, the Russian's are at the end of their rope there and if the Ukrainians breakthrough to their rear, they can really put all that combined arms and armored maneuver training to use and clean up really fast, with a million-man reserve force of territorial old farts ready to move in behind to keep and police what the young guys take.I knew Prighozin was getting whacked,Putin needed a W,and played it perfectly,he made Prighozin feel safe not acting immediately so he could de-fang Wagner of their heavy weaponry and gain control of Prighozin's lucrative businesses. When Putin sided w/the military in this dispute and ordered Wagner to give a pledge of allegiance to the Russian military Prighozin should have stepped back as this was an ultamatem w/death in the cards,Prighozin got power drunk and paid. Basically this was a gift for Putin to show competance in the face of his disastrous decision to invade Ukraine.
You want a rudder, he added one...You might be missing my question. The cardboard planes do not have an elevator and the only stability provided by the reflex of the ailerons. When you want to turn you need to adjust the ailerons and the plane banks, then you add up elevator to turn. The airplane wing is flat with no dihedral, the wing is higher than the fuselage would help with the mass below but it still would take some skill to fly it.
Yeah, so? Still need to learn how to fly a plane or is it as easy as flying a drone? Could make the difference if they want to swarm a position.You want a rudder, he added one...
Depends on the drone a DJI video drone is easy to fly, but an FPV drone takes skill, but the FC does offer 3 different flight modes from full manual (acro), auto level and rate which are simpler aids. An FC will do much for a cardboard plane drone and is required for GPS with a cat launch say, no piloting skill at all would be required, just program in the GPS coordinates for a fixed target in using a cell phone with Bluetooth and push the button and it goes into auto launch mode, then throttles back for cruse to the first waypoint programmed into ardupilotYeah, so? Still need to learn how to fly a plane or is it as easy as flying a drone? Could make the difference if they want to swarm a position.
So what keeps the aircraft stable after an upset? How does the controller know? Is a GPS receiver included in the FC (also your use of abbreviations can leave some in the dust.One other thing, the FC I posted has assisted flying modes that make flying much easier, and you can set the FC up for this kind of box wing with presets in the open-source software used to program and setup the FC.
The GPS module is usually separate as is a magnetometer and the plane has full auto pilot and can deal with a lot of adverse weather conditions. A barometer is included on the Fight control computer for altitude and can be auto calibrated on launch. It can be set up like a cruise missile, no radio receiver, just a custom app to enter the data and a button to launch vis Bluetooth even. If you look at the specs of the plane FC I posted, you'll see it is very capable for a mere 40 some bucks, GPS modules are there too for under $20, but I imagine they would buy really good ones, GPS can also provide altitude info. The ardupilot open-source project make a lot of the things you see in drone videos possible, for commercial and military too. It is a key technical resource for a lot of autonomous projects. It is difficult to work with, but the technical people take care of that and make it as simple as possible for people in the field using a custom android app.So what keeps the aircraft stable after an upset? How does the controller know? Is a GPS receiver included in the FC (also your use of abbreviations can leave some in the dust.
Read some of the software capabilities, could not find what I was looking for but I can assume they have it somewhere and a plug in board will give the plane's attitude
Things like Flight control computers and other dirt-cheap electronics along with projects like ardupilot have collapsed development times for some tech. Rather than do R&D from the ground up like in the old days, they assemble things like lego building blocks and use building blocks of code and complete apps. There is a lot of civilian technology that can be leveraged into "dual use" these days and small groups of engineers using new materials and shrinking electronics can act quickly and with not much money backing them can realize a lot of projects like drones in less than a year.So what keeps the aircraft stable after an upset? How does the controller know? Is a GPS receiver included in the FC (also your use of abbreviations can leave some in the dust.
Read some of the software capabilities, could not find what I was looking for but I can assume they have it somewhere and a plug in board will give the plane's attitude
Beyond LOS, in autonomous flight, how does it (cheaply and precisely) sense attitude and change of attitude (and ideally the derivative of change) on the three axes? The drones in question are the Russia penetrators. Never mind pilot input bLOS.If a pilot is flying it FPV or LOS, then they would correct the issue, a plane flight control computer does the same thing a real one does and can cope with similar situations, depending on how it is configured. The flight control computer makes the plane easier to fly for inexperienced pilots with a variety of flight modes like auto level etc. It would take a bit of RC and FPV training to use one of these as a weapon on the field under manual control, but not too much, no more than flying an FPV quadcopter. It's just as cheap as a quadcopter, but with a much longer potential reach and bigger payload. Exactly how upset it would have to be not to recover would probably depend on altitude and the time required to recover, these fly close to the ground. You can use a quadcopter in very windy conditions, but there are probably lots of times when these can't be used, or a tailwind could increase their range by a lot!
GPS and a barometer on the FC for altitude and it has inertial sensors like those used in a cellphone too, it is basically the stuff you find in a cellphone. GPS can give altitude, speed and heading, most RC planes don't bother with a magnetometer for RTH or heading because planes move all the time and drones can hover.Beyond LOS, in autonomous flight, how does it (cheaply and precisely) sense attitude and change of attitude (and ideally the derivative of change) on the three axes? The drones in question are the Russia penetrators. Never mind pilot input bLOS.
Well, your cellphone (if you have one) can use a free app called spirt level that works very well as a level and they use the same or better sensor on a chip. GPS can supply altitude and heading data, no need of the magnetometer in a plane since it is moving. It will reduce its flutter in turbulence and smooth out the ride and in autonomous mode it will pilot the plane and respond to conditions, but there are limits. If you are in FPV mode the data is displayed on the OSD (On Screen Display) the HUD, when you set things up in betaflight, inav or arupilot, you can pick and choose what appears on the screen.Uh, you are doing it again. I got that technology can make a plane easier to fly, even going back a ways when we had mixed ailerons/elevator control. The question again, how does the plane know if it is not flying as it is expected? How does it know if the plane is level or not, banking or not? Say a side wind is blowing it off the desired path? Is there sensors to tell it how many degrees it is off of level? I understand anything can be programmed into a computer, my question is what does the controller have in terms of sensors to look at to tell it if it is going according to plan?
So they all have to have a GPS receiver in them. A barometer might be tricky but I'll say ok.