Is Biden really that bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
Biden administration sued for allegedly hiding documents on baby formula investigation

Facebook Instagram portal for executive to request what news stories and content gets censored:

Funny, wast the FCC threatening to break FB up all the while DHS is asking for 1A "favors" on the backside? What a huge coincidence.
 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
The hell it don't. Biden is about to windfall tax the oil companies for their "record profits" but there's no buyer for this one. First clue.

Why would anyone invest in a refinery when admin is waging war on hydrocarbons. Takes 10 years to see a return on a refinery.
So your worried about a company that made 18 billion dollars getting taxed hard...

Maybe that same company can reinvest they're earnings in this refinery..ask them

Or maybe asked all the companies that made 100 billion to invest,

Maybe u don't realize they made all this money off of us....the consumer
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Washington Examiner

But CNN is OK, right? I mean left..


Screenshot - 2022-11-02T180540.554.png
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
So your worried about a company that made 18 billion dollars getting taxed hard...

Maybe that same company can reinvest they're earnings in this refinery..ask them

Or maybe asked all the companies that made 100 billion to invest,

Maybe u don't realize they made all this money off of us....the consumer
I mostly ride a single cylinder motorcycle so I didn't contribute much.

Record prices lead to record profits? No way!

Why is wholesale inflation always higher than retail as of late if these companies aren't trying to absorb some of your costs?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
But CNN is OK, right? I mean left..


View attachment 5221137
CNN’s left bias is history. It got purchased by a rightie with editorial ambitions.

 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
CNN’s left bias is history. It got purchased by a rightie with editorial ambitions.

Perhaps, but you didn't seem to have any issue considering CNN articles to be generally true and newsworthy in the past few years. I mean, I haven't seen you previously stamp them as "left-leaning" in an attempt to tacitly discredit their newsworthiness, the way you just did with the Examiner.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Perhaps, but you didn't seem to have any issue considering CNN articles to be generally true and newsworthy in the past few years. I mean, I haven't seen you previously stamp them as "left-leaning" in an attempt to tacitly discredit their newsworthiness, the way you just did with the Examiner.
You are not acknowledging the basic asymmetry that has developed. Center and left sources are in the noise floor of the usual drizzle of inaccuracies. The right press has organized behind a shield wall of now-familiar lies. Your both-sidesing is a sly denial of this situation.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
You are not acknowledging the basic asymmetry that has developed. Center and left sources are in the noise floor of the usual drizzle of inaccuracies. The right press has organized behind a shield wall of now-familiar lies. Your both-sidesing is a sly denial of this situation.
Regardless, your attempts at dismissing the newsworthiness of articles based simply on publication association shows a lack of care in actually considering the information presented. Unfortunately yes, both sides are guilty of perpetrating propaganda in efforts to fuel their agenda. That's an acknowledgement, not a denial. Your strategy in this plot is much akin to that of Kikazaru and Mizaru.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Regardless, your attempts at dismissing the newsworthiness of articles based simply on publication association shows a lack of care in actually considering the information presented. Unfortunately yes, both sides are guilty of perpetrating propaganda in efforts to fuel their agenda. That's an acknowledgement, not a denial. Your strategy in this plot is much akin to that of Kikazaru and Mizaru.
What you obfuscate is that one side is committing far more numerous and far more severe dishonesties than the other.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
What you obfuscate is that one side is committing far more numerous and far more severe dishonesties than the other.
What do you think the ratio is, 2:1?

In fact, I'm not obfuscating it at all. My only point, was that you can not tacitly dismiss information simply based upon association, yet you seem to do it as one on your standard defense mechanisms quite regularly. If anything you are contorting that point, in an effort to shine the light away from it and onto something which keeps you on the offense. This isn't ping pong however. At some point you have to catch the ball and own it.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
What do you think the ratio is, 2:1?

In fact, I'm not obfuscating it at all. My only point, was that you can not tacitly dismiss information simply based upon association, yet you seem to do it as one on your standard defense mechanisms quite regularly. If anything you are contorting that point, in an effort to shine the light away from it and onto something which keeps you on the offense. This isn't ping pong however. At some point you have to catch the ball and own it.
2:1 using what as the dimension? Pseudoquantitative argument
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top