War

AntoMaria7

AntoMaria7

Well-Known Member
I don’t know if it’s already been discussed so sorry if i spam but what it’s your opinion on this statement
“Our submarines are capable of launching over 500 nuclear warheads, which guarantees the destruction of the U.S. and all NATO countries,” Kiselyov said on his weekly program, “Vesti Nedeli.”
“Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?”
Kiselyov’s comments came hours after Putin announced he was placing Russia’s nuclear deterrence forces on “high alert,” citing“aggressive statements” and economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by NATO.
It is only for intimidation or it can go down to this? I’m afraid that putin at this point would prefer to end it like this even if it will kill himself and be like see i did it im putin the shit than to end it how it is and support consequences. I’m praying i’m wrong
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
AntoMaria7 said:
I don’t know if it’s already been discussed so sorry if i spam but what it’s your opinion on this statement
“Our submarines are capable of launching over 500 nuclear warheads, which guarantees the destruction of the U.S. and all NATO countries,” Kiselyov said on his weekly program, “Vesti Nedeli.”
“Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?”
Kiselyov’s comments came hours after Putin announced he was placing Russia’s nuclear deterrence forces on “high alert,” citing“aggressive statements” and economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by NATO.
It is only for intimidation or it can go down to this? I’m afraid that putin at this point would prefer to end it like this even if it will kill himself and be like see i did it im putin the shit than to end it how it is and support consequences. I’m praying i’m wrong
Click to expand...
500 warheads are a considerable number. But the plain fact is the concept of nuclear eradication of entire regions has not been put to the test, so we don’t know. I’m ok with the idea never being tested.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
There are some interesting names on this flyer for a "Peace Rally". It seems the Labour Party has some potato heads in their midst too. "Britain playing a provocative role"?



View attachment 5094881


www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

John McDonnell Faces Losing Labour Whip Over Stop The War Rally Appearance

The former shadow chancellor is due to speak at the 'No War In Ukraine' event in London.
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

A description of the rally says: “We oppose Russian military intervention in Ukraine. We also recognise this is a conflict thirty years in the making, a conflict in which Britain is playing a provocative role - talking up war, decrying diplomacy and supplying arms to Ukraine as well as supporting increased military deployments to neighbouring countries.

“Leading figures from the anti-war movement will provide insight and analysis missing from most media coverage. We must ensure that the anti-war campaign is prepared and organised to pull us back from the precipice - so come along on Wednesday.”

At a meeting of the parliamentary Labour party on Monday, Keir Starmer made it clear than any member who does not support Nato would be kicked out.

He said: “Labour’s commitment to democracy, the rule of law and the sovereignty of independent nations is unshakable.
“Vladimir Putin is attacking all those things. Nato is defending them.

“There are groups in this country who haven’t seemed to understand that difference.

“Let me be very clear. There will be no place in this party for false equivalence between the actions of Russia and the actions of Nato.”

Is this grass roots British or astroturf psy ops?
Click to expand...
No everyone on that list is Putin’s bitch. Like I said, pondlife
Edit: Tariq Ali, omfg are we back in the 80’s
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
AntoMaria7 said:
I don’t know if it’s already been discussed so sorry if i spam but what it’s your opinion on this statement
“Our submarines are capable of launching over 500 nuclear warheads, which guarantees the destruction of the U.S. and all NATO countries,” Kiselyov said on his weekly program, “Vesti Nedeli.”
“Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?”
Kiselyov’s comments came hours after Putin announced he was placing Russia’s nuclear deterrence forces on “high alert,” citing“aggressive statements” and economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by NATO.
It is only for intimidation or it can go down to this? I’m afraid that putin at this point would prefer to end it like this even if it will kill himself and be like see i did it im putin the shit than to end it how it is and support consequences. I’m praying i’m wrong
Click to expand...
they may be capable of starting to launch missiles, but half the world can track their attack subs, easily.. and there are sub killer attack subs trailing their's...if they go into anything like a full launch cycle, especially now, with all those service people on edge, just waiting for a reason...there are going to be a lot of russian sarcophagi slowly rotting in the ocaen, with mostly full payloads of warheads.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
AntoMaria7 said:
I don’t know if it’s already been discussed so sorry if i spam but what it’s your opinion on this statement
“Our submarines are capable of launching over 500 nuclear warheads, which guarantees the destruction of the U.S. and all NATO countries,” Kiselyov said on his weekly program, “Vesti Nedeli.”
“Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?”
Kiselyov’s comments came hours after Putin announced he was placing Russia’s nuclear deterrence forces on “high alert,” citing“aggressive statements” and economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by NATO.
It is only for intimidation or it can go down to this? I’m afraid that putin at this point would prefer to end it like this even if it will kill himself and be like see i did it im putin the shit than to end it how it is and support consequences. I’m praying i’m wrong
Click to expand...
Russia has about 500 warheads at sea in subs, however, we have had the worlds oceans literally wired for sound since the 60s and we know where every one is. Each one is picked up by at least two attack subs who shadow it within attack range, this does not count the European navies who also have excellent diesel powered subs whose mission is to track these subs. That also doesn't count the surface and air antisubmarine forces either. Everybody is networked together inside NATO.

Unlike the Russians, each American boomer sub can destroy every Russian population center of over 100K and depopulate Russia down to 16 million radiation sickened souls. The Americans have several of these and almost all are at sea now, the UK has them too, as do the French. This does not count the nuclear armed cruise missiles either, the Russians don't know where our subs are and they are guarded by escorting attack subs. Then there is the land based ICBM force of the US UK and France...

The Russian military know this as does the security services and they have families and children and know the west is no threat to Russia these days. Mad Vlad the invader might have to go.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
DIY-HP-LED said:
Russia has about 500 warheads at sea in subs, however, we have had the worlds oceans literally wired for sound since the 60s and we know where every one is. Each one is picked up by at least two attack subs who shadow it within attack range, this does not count the European navies who also have excellent diesel powered subs whose mission is to track these subs. That also doesn't count the surface and air antisubmarine forces either. Everybody is networked together inside NATO.

Unlike the Russians, each American boomer sub can destroy every Russian population center of over 100K and depopulate Russia down to 16 million radiation sickened souls. The Americans have several of these and almost all are at sea now, the UK has them too, as do the French. This does not count the nuclear armed cruise missiles either, the Russians don't know where our subs are and they are guarded by escorting attack subs. Then there is the land based ICBM force of the US UK and France...

The Russian military know this as does the security services and they have families and children and know the west is no threat to Russia these days. Mad Vlad the invader might have to go.
Click to expand...
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
"And U.S. officials, to whom Newsweek reached out for comment, say "such a program is not under active consideration." "
RIIGGGHHTT, not under active consideration...
View attachment 5094999
Click to expand...
We will hear little of what we are doing to help, at least for now, the glory will go to the Ukrainians, as it should and will make Vlad's public humiliation more intense. Other former republics surrounding Russia might get ideas because of Russian military weakness and being tied down in Ukraine, courage is also highly contagious, Belarus appears to be a weak sister to me, a deeply unpopular régime propped up by demoralized conscript Russian Troops, Belarus got sanctioned too and political control is tenuous there already. Belarus is also at Vlad's back in the thrust on Kyiv and if they started fire bombing supply convoys there...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top