Where are my libertarians at

maxamus1

Well-Known Member
lol at you trying to act superior after acting like a fire in another continent has anything to do with the EPA.


You are acting like we give a shit which propaganda troll is spamming us.
Oooohhhhhhh you said a bad word. My god man are you bipolar? You guys hate the truth it burns at your skin like fire on oil you try to twist and turn words and naritives to suite you views then attack those that won't cover to your word. Sucks when it won't work on some people huh.and
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Alright here we go. Yes the epa has stopped a lot of the pollution the can not and will not stop it all. Point in case (https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/2366999) i use this because one they are well knowen, its somewhat recent and the length of time it took to resolve compared to the fine. Further more has anyone been to the ohio river? Seriously they recommend you don't swim in it cause its so bad or how about Michigan and there tan tied water that has not gotten better in how long? As for air pollution the EPA says that cow farts are partially to blame for global warming as well so I can't take them to seriously. If you honestly think that the EPA gives a flying F about us and the earth I believe you are sadly mistaken.
Whats your point about Walmart. It just strengthens my argument about big business polluting us off the earth. And they use fancy lawyers to fight things, and delay for as long as they can. And let it be known its the reTHUGliKLANS that have let big business skirt the laws, and extend court cases for years

Dude, I live on the Ohio River, and have all my life. Ashland, Kentucky. Look it up. While the Ohio River still polluted, its way better than it was, and our air is way better than it used to be.
Like I said, the reason the EPA doesnt do more is because big business, and the reThugliKLANS have fought them every step of the way.


In my part of the country the air used to be so bad they would give warnings about going outside. The smog was so thick from the local Coke plant, and the Tannery it would gag you. Now all that is gone.
The Democrats have tried to fix the Michigan water Crisis, but the Rs have fought them every step of the way.

DONT TELL ME THE GOP ARE FOR CLEAN AIR, AND WATER.


Trump’s EPA Finalizes Its Gutting of Clean Water Rules ...
...
Apr 21, 2020 · “Trump’s EPA is taking advantage of a pandemic to covertly gut water safeguards. Under the cover of COVID-19, the Trump administration is giving extractive and polluting industries the power to dig up and destroy wetlands and to dump waste in streams, lakes, and wetlands all over the country. We will see them in court.”

EPA reverses Trump rule that gutted clean water ...
...
Nov 18, 2021 · The Environmental Protection Agency announced today draft language to reverse a harmful Trump administration rule that removed federal clean water protections against pollution and destruction from streams, wetlands, and lakes. The scale of the Trump rule’s impact was unprecedented and went so far as to remove protections for places like South Carolina’s Lake Keowee,


Trump rule limits states from blocking pipeline projects ...
...
Jun 01, 2020 · The Trump administration gutted a key portion of the Clean Water Act on Monday, limiting states’ ability to block controversial pipeline projects that cross their waterways

Scoff all you want about cows, and Farm Animals in general, not just cattle, being a major contributor to global warming. NASA says they are. Farm Animals are responsible for about 26% of methane pollution. I guess youre another science denier. You can have opinions, but opinions arent FACTS. I like beef as well as the next carnivor, but if the science says farm animals are a major contributor to Methane Pollution, I have to believe them if its a scientific fact.

Methane gas fermented in the guts of farm animals contribute up to 26 percent of U.S. methane emissions.

Ruminants are herbivores that regurgitate their food to re-chew it. Microorganisms in the animal’s gut break down carbohydrates into simpler molecules. ITS NOT THE FARTS THAT CAUSE THE METHANE, ITS REGURGITATION.

Ruminants including cattle and deer produce large amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas with an impact on the atmosphere 23 times greater than that of carbon dioxide. The production of methane by this process is called enteric fermentation, and it accounts for more than a quarter of methane emissions in the United States.

SHOW ME FACTUAL STUDIES THAT HAVE BEEN PEER REVIEWED, AND PROVE THIS TO BE WRONG. NOT JUST YOUR BELIEF.

And regardless of farm animals causing 26% of the Methane Pollution, the GOP believe that climate change doesnt even exist, when the Majority of scientists have proven otherwise. Only a very few scientists dont believe in man made global warming.
97% OF THE WORLDS SCIENTISTS BELIEVE IN MAN MADE GLOBALE WARMING. ONLY 3% DONT AGREE.

NASA ALSO BELIEVES IT, AS DOES TH US MILITARY.
Do scientists agree on climate change? – Climate Change ...
Nov 30, 2021 · Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,

The 97% consensus on global warming - Skeptical Science


  1. Climate Change Threatens National Security Says Pentagon ...
    ...
    Climate change poses “immediate risks” to national security and will have broad and costly impacts on the way the US military carries out its missions, the Pentagon said in a. (link is external) new report on the impact of climate change released on 13 October. The Defense Department said in the report, described as a “Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap," that it has begun to boost its "resilience" and ensure …











1638922110359.png
 
Last edited:

Horselover fat

Well-Known Member
I don't believe in total anarchy. I do believe that we need some sort of law and government but limited in nature. While yes I like the idea of total anarchy it would be very problematic for moist of society my self included. Im personally more of a constitutionalist but as it sits there are to many interpretations of what the constitution means.
Maybe actually read something, preferably a book, and learn what anarchism actually means.

Gotta love you leftys. No actual clue if what's really going on but will blindly follow what's on tv. Lmao god I love you guys, you always give me a good laugh.
:roll:
 
Top