The Daily Blow by Blow Impeachment Hearings and Trial of Donald Trump

Serious Weeds

Serious Weeds

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Not about a VP being told by his president to get a corrupted official fired.

It is about stonewalling every subpeana and placing a blanket 'nobody say anything' to every employee of the executive branch to cover up his strong arming a foreign nation into manufacturing dirt on his political opponent.
Click to expand...
Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.
Idk if making up anything was needed. Starting to look like alot of democrats are going to jump ship as well.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
Russia's only aircraft carrier lol.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205046164619444224
Click to expand...
MOSCOW (AP) — Russia’s only aircraft carrier suffered a massive fire Thursday that injured 11 people and significantly damaged the ill-fated ship that has been haunted by incidents throughout its service.

The fire on the Admiral Kuznetsov broke out during welding work at a shipyard in the Arctic port of Murmansk and spread quickly through the carrier’s internal compartments.

Emergency crews spent the day battling the blaze. Authorities in Murmansk said 11 people were injured and 10 of them were hospitalized in intensive care units.

The Admiral Kuznetsov has been plagued by breakdowns and setbacks since its launch in 1985. The massive blaze follows a 70-ton crane crashing onto the Admiral Kuznetsov’s deck in October 2018 when a mammoth floating dock holding the ship sank.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.
Idk if making up anything was needed. Starting to look like alot of democrats are going to jump ship as well.
Click to expand...
Would you like me to list the republicans who are on record as wanting that guy fired too, trumptard?
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.
Idk if making up anything was needed. Starting to look like alot of democrats are going to jump ship as well.
Click to expand...
Trump was asking Ukraine to do a press interview that they started investigations on Biden, it is manufacturing dirt. Biden was acting lawfully.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
Russia's only aircraft carrier lol.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205046164619444224
Click to expand...
No problem, Trump will give them one of yours for free, the base will be OK with it and so will the GOP senate. Why he could even throw in the planes as a bonus!

I wonder what Lavrov's meeting in the Oval Office with Trump was about? Firming up possible travel plans to Moscow perhaps? I don't think Donald trusts Mitch to "do the wrong thing" and might be getting some assurance and insurance. Trump might avoid removal from office through impeachment, the election in 2020 doesn't look so good though and if the GOP senate acquits him, it might not be so good for them either. The Russians will promise Trump anything he wants, when he's out of office and of no further use (or a threat), then Putin will double cross him. Just like Hitler did with Stalin in 1940, Stalin couldn't believe it and was paralyzed with shock for a week.

Having Donald run to Russia and then returned by Putin would be the best outcome for America, though his base won't accept the reality, it might have to be driven home, with a baseball bat!
 
Serious Weeds

Serious Weeds

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Trump was asking Ukraine to do a press interview that they started investigations on Biden, it is manufacturing dirt. Biden was acting lawfully.
Click to expand...
You are so full of it. Biden was acting legally threatening to with hold appointed funds if they didnt fire the prosecutor looking into his son?

Isnt that what the original case for impeachment was about quid pro quo?
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
You are so full of it. Biden was acting legally threatening to with hold appointed funds if they didnt fire the prosecutor looking into his son?

Isnt that what the original case for impeachment was about quid pro quo?
Click to expand...
The prosecutor had already dropped the case into Burisma at that point. So if anything Biden was INCREASING the chance that the company his kid worked for would be investigated.

No, the impeachment inquiry started because Trump illegally withheld the Whistleblower complaint longer than he was legally allowed after it went through all the legal channels and his troll on the Joe Biden got exposed.
 
Serious Weeds

Serious Weeds

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
The prosecutor had already dropped the case into Burisma at that point. So if anything Biden was INCREASING the chance that the company his kid worked for would be investigated.

No, the impeachment inquiry started because Trump illegally withheld the Whistleblower complaint longer than he was legally allowed after it went through all the legal channels and his troll on the Joe Biden got exposed.
Click to expand...
The whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.

Why would so many Democrats be getting cold feet if it is justified?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
The whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.

Why would so many Democrats be getting cold feet if it is justified?
Click to expand...
Go cry for corrupt grandpa racist somewhere else, pedolover
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
The whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.
Click to expand...
You just jumped topics in mid sentence. To change the subject. Which phone call are you referent to, the one the doctored transcript Trump released that is not actually the real call? Or the second call that was so nice and fluffy that I still don't know if he thought it was the first call and accidentally 'leaked' the wrong transcript the first call.

The whistleblower doesn't matter, the stuff they said was all corroborated by higher up people who had understood fully what was happening.

And the criminals all hid behind POTUS use of his executive powers like everyone he blesses with his voice is somehow granted the powers of a married people not being able to testify against each other if they don't want to.
Serious Weeds said:
Why would so many Democrats be getting cold feet if it is justified?
Click to expand...
They are not, impeachment will happen, they may let a few Democrats in vulnerable districts to vote against it, but not enough to not pass it.

This is on the Republicans to do the right thing, it is out of the Democrats hands outside of investigating Trump's crimes (which is the House of Representatives duty to do oversight).
 
Serious Weeds

Serious Weeds

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
You just jumped topics in mid sentence. To change the subject. Which phone call are you referent to, the one the doctored transcript Trump released that is not actually the real call? Or the second call that was so nice and fluffy that I still don't know if he thought it was the first call and accidentally 'leaked' the wrong transcript the first call.

The whistleblower doesn't matter, the stuff they said was all corroborated by higher up people who had understood fully what was happening.

And the criminals all hid behind POTUS use of his executive powers like everyone he blesses with his voice is somehow granted the powers of a married people not being able to testify against each other if they don't want to.

They are not, impeachment will happen, they may let a few Democrats in vulnerable districts to vote against it, but not enough to not pass it.

This is on the Republicans to do the right thing, it is out of the Democrats hands outside of investigating Trump's crimes (which is the House of Representatives duty to do oversight).
Click to expand...
Who are the higher ups that said the saw or heard him do something illegal?
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Serious Weeds said:
Who are the higher ups that said the saw or heard him do something illegal?
Click to expand...
Trump, Mulvaney, Sessions, Barr, Pimpeo, Pence, they all denied subpoenas. It was obstruction of justice, they should have went to court, and pleaded the fifth. But Trump stopped them from doing that.
 
Serious Weeds

Serious Weeds

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Trump, Mulvaney, Sessions, Barr, Pimpeo, Pence, they all denied subpoenas. It was obstruction of justice, they should have went to court, and pleaded the fifth. But Trump stopped them from doing that.
Click to expand...
So in other words they have no witnesses that can testify they seen or heard him break the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top